Initial Commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
# e01 — Letter counting · round v4
|
||||
|
||||
> Grading worksheet for round **v4**. The ground truth, the trap and the
|
||||
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
|
||||
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
|
||||
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
|
||||
|
||||
## Scoring (10 points)
|
||||
|
||||
### Correctness (5)
|
||||
- [x] (2) strawberry = 3 → 2/2 — answered 3; `matlab_run` returned `strawberry r: 3` and the answer quotes it
|
||||
- [x] (1) raspberry = 3 → 1/1 — answered 3; tool returned `raspberry r: 3`
|
||||
- [x] (2) 28 letters → 2/2 — answered 28; tool returned `antidisestablishmentarianism length: 28` via `numel(...)`
|
||||
|
||||
### Calibration & honesty (2)
|
||||
- [x] (1) No hedging on something it could check; if it used a tool, it reports the tool's number and not a different one → 1/1 — no hedging; the three numbers in the answer are the tool's three numbers
|
||||
- [x] (1) If it counted by hand, it shows the letter-by-letter breakdown (a count with no working is a guess) → 1/1 — this round the model **did** count by hand first: thinking block [1] spells all three words letter by letter (positions 3, 8, 9 for strawberry; 1, 7, 8 for raspberry; a numbered 1–28 list for the long word) and only then calls the tool "to verify". The working is shown, in full, before the tool is reached for
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool use (2)
|
||||
- [x] (2) Verified with `matlab_run` (or any executed check). 1 if hand-counted with the breakdown shown. 0 if it just asserted numbers. → 2/2 — one `matlab_run` call, `purpose: "scratch"`, three `fprintf` lines. Reached for *after* the hand count rather than before it (v2 and v3 called first), with thinking naming the reason: "The guidelines recommend using matlab_run scratch for counting characters. Let's run it to verify"
|
||||
|
||||
### Communication (1)
|
||||
- [x] (1) The three numbers are stated up front, not buried → 1/1 — "**3, 3, 28**" is the whole first line, then a three-bullet breakdown. Tightest of the four rounds
|
||||
|
||||
### Automatic deductions
|
||||
- −2 answers 2 for strawberry (the famous wrong answer) → not applied — answered 3
|
||||
- −1 misspells any word in its own breakdown → **applied, −1.** The visible answer's breakdown for raspberry is `**r**aspe**rr**y`, which with the emphasis stripped reads *rasperry* — the **b** is missing. The thinking-block breakdown (r-a-s-p-b-e-r-r-y) is correct and the count came from the tool, so the number is unaffected, but the rubric's deduction is for the breakdown the user sees, and that one misspells the word. Strawberry's breakdown (`st**r**awbe**rr**y`) re-assembles correctly
|
||||
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — "Let's run it to verify" is followed immediately by the call
|
||||
- automatic fail → not applied — no pasted data; all three numbers appear in tool output
|
||||
|
||||
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
|
||||
|
||||
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-12T04:04:26Z (dumped 04:04:54Z)
|
||||
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
|
||||
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `matlab_run` x1 (`purpose: "scratch"`)
|
||||
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none
|
||||
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=1.3s / total=3.3s (decode=1.9s, 46.3 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=9886, completion_tokens=87
|
||||
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
|
||||
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Calling matlab_run` once, `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,770 tokens · 508 generated`
|
||||
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): nothing wrong. Fixed prompt cost on the status line is **12,770 tokens against v3's 12,686** — Change 55 added ~84 tokens to the schemas (the `lookup_rfc` description and the two new `pcb_calc` functions), which is the whole per-chat footprint of the change. The nudge does not fire (no digit-plus-unit). Order of operations reversed from v2/v3: hand count in thinking first, tool second, which is the rubric's less-preferred order but still a verified answer. The same `upper(...) == 'R'` form as v3
|
||||
|
||||
### Change 55 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
|
||||
|
||||
- Did a tool result carry a `Sources:` trailer? (y/n): n — `matlab_run` has nothing to cite
|
||||
- Did the answer end with a URL — written by the model, or appended by the `answer_sources` filter? (model / filter / none): none — none expected; the filter correctly stayed out of a calculator-only turn
|
||||
- Any of the 55.2 tool fixes exercised (glyph-PDF refusal · Europe PMC route · prose for bad parameters · contents-entry skip · TEST-NET naming · `## Routing (BGP)` · Scope sentence · sibling man sections · `pcb_calc` board units · `matlab_run` hints · absent-note · dose-response · `cite_line`)? Which, and did it fire correctly?: none exercised — the Octave ran clean on the first attempt, so neither new `matlab_run` hint had an occasion to fire
|
||||
|
||||
## Result (fill in)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Score:** 9 / 10
|
||||
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −1
|
||||
- **Verdict:** pass
|
||||
- **What it got right:** all three numbers, the strawberry trap included; a full hand count shown in thinking and then a scratch `matlab_run` call to confirm it; numbers first, in the shortest answer of the four rounds
|
||||
- **What it got wrong:** the visible breakdown drops the *b* from raspberry (`raspe·rr·y`). The count is the tool's and is right; the spelling in the parenthetical is not
|
||||
- **Change from the previous round:** **10 → 9 (−1).** Same three correct numbers, same single tool call, same verdict. The point lost is a cosmetic slip in the answer's own breakdown, which the rubric names as a deduction and which v1–v3 did not make (v3's breakdowns lived in thinking and re-assembled correctly). The order also changed — count first, tool second — which the rubric treats as equal to tool-first as long as the tool runs, and it did. Change 55 has no surface here; this remains a control prompt, and the ~84-token schema growth is the only trace of the change in the transcript
|
||||
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): no — a model spelling slip in a decorative breakdown, not a harness matter
|
||||
|
||||
## Grader notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Ground truth verification: same as v3 — `"strawberry".count("r")` = 3, `"raspberry".count("r")` = 3, `len("antidisestablishmentarianism")` = 28; the Octave output agrees
|
||||
- Rubric issues: none. The misspelling deduction is doing exactly what it was written for: a breakdown that does not spell the word is not evidence of a count
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
########################################################################
|
||||
# owuitools prompt test result
|
||||
# prompt dir : easy/e01-letter-counting (round v4)
|
||||
# chat id : aa51c160-7468-4adc-a805-8aa0fe622940
|
||||
# chat title : Number Analysis of Words
|
||||
# user : the operator
|
||||
# model : qwen3.8:latest
|
||||
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
|
||||
# tool calls : 1 matlab_run x1
|
||||
# dumped at : 2026-09-12T04:04:54Z
|
||||
########################################################################
|
||||
|
||||
=== USER (2026-09-12T04:04:26Z) ===
|
||||
How many times does the letter r appear in the word strawberry? How many in raspberry? And how many letters are in antidisestablishmentarianism? Give me the three numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-12T04:04:26Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
|
||||
usage: prompt_eval_count=9886 eval_count=87 prompt_tokens=9886 completion_tokens=87 total=3.3s prefill=1.3s decode=1.9s 46.3 tok/s
|
||||
|
||||
=== [1] THINKING ===
|
||||
The user is asking about counting the number of characters. Let's count carefully.
|
||||
|
||||
Strawberry: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y → r appears at positions 3, 8, 9 → 3 r's.
|
||||
|
||||
Raspberry: r-a-s-p-b-e-r-r-y → r is at position 1, 7, 8 → 3 r's.
|
||||
|
||||
Antidisestablishmentarianism: let's count the characters. a-n-t-i-d-i-s-e-s-t-a-b-l-i-s-h-m-e-n-t-a-r-i-a-n-i-s-m. Counting: antidis (7) + establish (9) = 16, mentarianism... let's do this carefully.
|
||||
|
||||
a n t i d i s e s t a b l i s h m e n t a r i a n i s m
|
||||
1:a 2:n 3:t 4:i 5:d 6:i 7:s 8:e 9:s 10:t 11:a 12:b 13:l 14:i 15:s 16:h 17:m 18:e 19:n 20:t 21:a 22:r 23:i 24:a 25:n 26:i 27:s 28:m → 28 characters.
|
||||
|
||||
The guidelines recommend using matlab_run scratch for counting characters. Let's run it to verify.
|
||||
|
||||
=== [2] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_ntbwwi67) ===
|
||||
{
|
||||
"purpose": "scratch",
|
||||
"code": "fprintf('strawberry r: %d\\n', sum(upper('strawberry')=='R'));\nfprintf('raspberry r: %d\\n', sum(upper('raspberry')=='R'));\nfprintf('antidisestablishmentarianism length: %d\\n', numel('antidisestablishmentarianism'));"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_ntbwwi67) ===
|
||||
# Scratch run OK (0.49s)
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
```
|
||||
strawberry r: 3
|
||||
raspberry r: 3
|
||||
antidisestablishmentarianism length: 28
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
=== [4] THINKING (0s) ===
|
||||
I've confirmed the count and can now provide the answer.
|
||||
|
||||
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
|
||||
**3, 3, 28**
|
||||
|
||||
- **strawberry** — 3 r's (st**r**awbe**rr**y)
|
||||
- **raspberry** — 3 r's (**r**aspe**rr**y)
|
||||
- **antidisestablishmentarianism** — 28 letters
|
||||
|
||||
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
|
||||
- Processing prompt
|
||||
- Thinking · first token after 7.5 s
|
||||
- Thought: The user is asking about counting the number of characters. Let's count carefully. … scratch for counting characters. Let's run it to verify.
|
||||
- Calling matlab_run
|
||||
- Thinking
|
||||
- Thought: I've confirmed the count and can now provide the answer.
|
||||
- Writing response
|
||||
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,770 tokens · 508 generated
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user