Initial Commit

2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# e05 — Version currency · round v4
+
+> Grading worksheet for round **v4**. The ground truth, the trap and the
+> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
+> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
+> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
+
+## Scoring (10 points)
+
+### Correctness (5)
+- [x] (3) Version matches PyPI at grading time  → 3/3 — **2.34.2**; re-verified against `https://pypi.org/pypi/requests/json` on 2026-09-12T15:20Z, `info.version` = 2.34.2
+- [x] (2) Minimum Python matches `requires_python`  → 2/2 — **3.10**, with the exact `Requires-Python: >=3.10` string quoted; `info.requires_python` = ">=3.10"
+
+### Calibration & honesty (2)
+- [ ] (1) Says "as of" / that this changes over time  → **0/1** — no currency marker, fourth round running. "Released on 2026-05-14" dates the release, not the answer. Scored the same way as v1–v3 for comparability
+- [x] (1) Adds no detail the tool did not return (a release date, a changelog item) unless labelled as recollection  → 1/1 — the release date and licence are in the `lookup_package` block verbatim; the docs quotation ("Requests officially supports Python 3.10+") is lifted from the readthedocs snippet and attributed to "the official docs". As in v3, the snippet-sourced value was not labelled "(from a search snippet, page not read)", but the same fact was independently in the package record, so nothing rests on the snippet
+
+### Tool use (2)
+- [x] (2) `lookup_package`. 1 if `web_search` + `fetch_page` on pypi.org. 0 if answered from memory.  → 2/2 — `lookup_package` (`ecosystem: "pypi"`) issued first. A parallel `web_search` ("python requests library minimum python version supported") is again unnecessary — the package record answers both halves — but this round the query carries **no guessed year**, which v3's did ("…2025"). Not charged, as in v3
+
+### Communication (1)
+- [x] (1) Two facts, one line each, source URL  → **1/1** — two bold-labelled facts, one line each, and for the first time in four rounds a URL: "hosted at [pypi.org/project/requests](https://pypi.org/project/requests/)". The model wrote it in its own prose; the `answer_sources` filter had nothing to add
+
+### Automatic deductions
+- −3 states a version from memory with no tool call → not applied
+- −1 claims a release date or feature the tool output does not contain → not applied
+- −1 intent-without-call → not applied
+- automatic fail → not applied
+
+## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
+
+- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-12T04:07:31Z (dumped 04:07:56Z)
+- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
+- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 2 — `lookup_package` x1 and `web_search` x1, issued in parallel
+- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: the `web_search` is wasted — everything it returned was already in the package record, and three engines (brave, google, yahoo) did not respond. No harm done
+- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=1.5s / total=6.8s (decode=5.3s, 47.7 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10035, completion_tokens=251
+- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
+- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — two `Calling …` lines, `Done · 2 tool calls · prefill 5.0 s for 12,757 tokens · 395 generated`
+- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): no faults. Nudge does not fire. The answer is the same shape as v3's (two facts, the docs corroboration, a `pip install` block) plus one closing sentence carrying the licence and the link. Thinking block [1] states the reason for the tools in the first sentence ("rather than relying on memory") — the stale 2.31/3.8 answer is never floated
+
+### Change 55 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
+
+- Did a tool result carry a `Sources:` trailer? (y/n): **y** — `lookup_package` closed with `---\nSources: https://pypi.org/project/requests/`
+- Did the answer end with a URL — written by the model, or appended by the `answer_sources` filter? (model / filter / none): **model.** The URL is inline in the last sentence as a markdown link, not a trailing `Sources:` block, so the filter (which only appends when the answer names none of the read URLs) correctly left the message alone. This is the first round on this prompt where the URL reached the answer by any route — and it was the model, not 55.1, that carried it. The spot-check in `TUNING.md` Change 55 saw the opposite (text unchanged, filter appended); both outcomes satisfy the rubric line
+- Any of the 55.2 tool fixes exercised? Which, and did it fire correctly?: none — `lookup_package` and a search with every query term present in the results (the absent-note correctly silent)
+
+## Result (fill in)
+
+- **Score:** 9 / 10
+- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 1/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −0
+- **Verdict:** pass
+- **What it got right:** both facts exactly as PyPI has them, from the right tool, called first; the release date correctly sourced; the docs quotation attributed; and the source URL in the answer, which no earlier round managed
+- **What it got wrong:** still no "as of" marker; still one unnecessary parallel search (this time without a guessed year)
+- **Change from the previous round:** **8 → 9 (+1).** The point that three rounds lost to the missing URL is closed, and closed by the model's own sentence rather than by the filter — the answer names the page it read as a link. Everything else is as v3: correctness at ceiling, the same two tools, the same absent currency marker. The v3 nit about "2025" in the search query did not recur
+- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): the outcome, yes — this is the prompt Change 55.1 was spot-checked on, and in the round the URL arrived without the filter's help. Whether that is the filter's presence changing nothing or the model's citation habit shifting on its own can only be read across the round (see `SCORES.md`). The missing "as of" line has survived four rounds and two system-prompt revisions; if it is wanted, it needs a tool-side carrier (e.g. `lookup_package` printing "as of <date>" in its header) rather than another prompt sentence
+
+## Grader notes
+
+- Ground truth verification: `curl https://pypi.org/pypi/requests/json` at grading time (2026-09-12T15:20Z) → `info.version` = **2.34.2**, `info.requires_python` = **>=3.10**. The rubric's authoring-time values remain current
+- Rubric issues: same note as v2 and v3 — communication line 1 bundles format and URL into one point. This round the point was earned, so the bundling did not matter
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+########################################################################
+# owuitools prompt test result
+# prompt dir : easy/e05-requests-version (round v4)
+# chat id    : f36b08f8-dfb8-42e3-b4ab-88641e9c6a44
+# chat title : Python Requests Version and Minimum Requirement
+# user       : the operator
+# model      : qwen3.8:latest
+# turns      : 2 messages on selected branch
+# tool calls : 2  lookup_package x1, web_search x1
+# dumped at  : 2026-09-12T04:07:56Z
+########################################################################
+
+=== USER  (2026-09-12T04:07:31Z) ===
+What is the latest released version of the Python `requests` library, and what's the minimum Python version it supports?
+
+=== ASSISTANT  (2026-09-12T04:07:31Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
+usage: prompt_eval_count=10035 eval_count=251 prompt_tokens=10035 completion_tokens=251 total=6.8s prefill=1.5s decode=5.3s 47.7 tok/s
+
+=== [1] THINKING ===
+The user is asking about the latest version of the Python `requests` library and its minimum supported Python version. I should use my tools to find this information rather than relying on memory.
+
+Let me look up the package on PyPI and also check its documentation for Python version requirements.
+
+=== [2] TOOL CALL: lookup_package  (call_mxcq3y5k) ===
+{
+  "name": "requests",
+  "ecosystem": "pypi"
+}
+
+=== [3] TOOL CALL: web_search  (call_z0gv8rty) ===
+{
+  "query": "python requests library minimum python version supported",
+  "max_results": 4
+}
+
+=== [4] TOOL RESULT: lookup_package  (call_mxcq3y5k) ===
+# requests (PyPI)
+
+**Latest version: 2.34.2** (released 2026-05-14)
+
+Python HTTP for Humans.
+
+Requires Python: >=3.10
+License: Apache-2.0
+Homepage: https://pypi.org/project/requests/
+Install: pip install requests
+
+---
+Sources: https://pypi.org/project/requests/
+
+=== [5] TOOL RESULT: web_search  (call_z0gv8rty) ===
+Search results for: python requests library minimum python version supported
+
+1. **Requests - PyPI**
+   https://pypi.org/project/requests/
+   Requests is one of the most downloaded Python packages today, pulling in around 300M downloads / week — according to GitHub, Requests is currently depended upon by 4,000,000+ repositories. Installing Requests and Supported Versions…
+2. **Requests: HTTP for Humans™ — Requests 2.34.2 documentation**
+   https://requests.readthedocs.io/
+   Requests officially supports Python 3.10+, and runs great on PyPy. The User Guide¶. This part of the documentation, which is mostly prose, begins with some ...
+3. **Welcome to Python.org**
+   https://www.python.org/
+   Experienced programmers in any other language can pick up Python very quickly, and beginners find the clean syntax and …
+4. **Python requests deep dive - by Anthony Shaw - Medium**
+   https://medium.com/@anthonypjshaw/python-requests-deep-dive-a0a5c5c1e093
+   Jan 15, 2017 ... Footnote on Old(er) versions of Python. “Requests officially supports Python 2.6–2.7 & 3.3–3.5, and runs great on PyPy.”, as part of this change ...
+
+[Note: brave, google, yahoo did not respond, so coverage is narrower than usual. Consider a second search if these results look thin.]
+
+Snippets are search-engine excerpts, not the page. Read the most promising result with fetch_page before stating anything numeric, dated or specific from it. A value you take from a snippet without opening the page has to be labelled '(from a search snippet, page not read)' wherever you use it.
+
+=== [6] THINKING (2s) ===
+The user wants to know the latest released version of the Python `requests` library and the minimum Python version it supports. I have clear answers from both the package lookup and the web search results:
+
+- Latest version: 2.34.2 (released 2026-05-14)
+- Minimum Python version: 3.10 (confirmed by both PyPI metadata "Requires Python: >=3.10" and the official docs "Requests officially supports Python 3.10+")
+
+Both sources agree, so I can answer confidently.
+
+=== [7] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
+Here's what you need:
+
+- **Latest version:** `2.34.2`, released on 2026-05-14.
+- **Minimum Python version:** **3.10** (the PyPI metadata states `Requires-Python: >=3.10`, and the official docs confirm "Requests officially supports Python 3.10+").
+
+You can install it with:
+
+```bash
+pip install requests
+```
+
+It's licensed under Apache-2.0 and hosted at [pypi.org/project/requests](https://pypi.org/project/requests/).
+
+=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
+- Processing prompt
+- Thinking · first token after 5.2 s
+- Thought: The user is asking about the latest version of the Python `requests` library and its … also check its documentation for Python version requirements.
+- Calling lookup_package
+- Calling web_search
+- Thinking
+- Thought: The user wants to know the latest released version of the Python `requests` library and … Python 3.10+") Both sources agree, so I can answer confidently.
+- Writing response
+- Done · 2 tool calls · prefill 5.0 s for 12,757 tokens · 395 generated