Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/prompt.txt
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/rubric.md
+47
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline
| | |
|---|---|
| **Difficulty** | easy |
| **Domain** | Linux |
| **Probes** | `read_man_page` before describing any command's options (explicit system-prompt rule) |
| **Tools expected** | `read_man_page` (`ls`) |
| **Trap** | The model knows these flags and will be tempted to skip the man page; `-A` is often misdescribed. |
## Ground truth (GNU coreutils `ls`)
- `-a`, `--all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.` — includes `.` and `..`
- `-A`, `--almost-all`: do not list implied `.` and `..` (shows other dotfiles)
- `-d`, `--directory`: list directories themselves, not their contents. So `ls -d .*` / `ls -dA *` list matching directory entries as entries instead of descending into them.
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [ ] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..`
- [ ] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles
- [ ] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [ ] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read
- [ ] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours
### Tool use (2)
- [ ] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference.
### Communication (1)
- [ ] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d`
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..`
- −2 no man page call
- −1 intent-without-call
- automatic fail
## Grading
One worksheet per round, alongside that round's transcript:
- `v1/grade.md` · `v1/result.txt` — first round (baseline)
- `v2/grade.md` · `v2/result.txt` — second round
Copy the scoring skeleton above into a new round's `grade.md` to add one.
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v1/grade.md
+53
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v1
> Grading worksheet for round **v1**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — says "`-a` shows everything, including `.` (the directory itself) and `..` (its parent)"; the `ls -a` example output lists both.
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "`-A` shows all dotfiles but **omits** those two implied entries … `-a` minus the noise of `.` and `..`"; example output shows `.git .env` with no `.`/`..`.
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quotes the man page line verbatim and explains "treats the directory as a single entry"; its extra claim that under `-d` the `-a`/`-A` distinction disappears is correct (verified, see Grader notes).
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — opens with "straight from the `ls` man page" and quotes the three option lines verbatim from the tool result. Minor: did not repeat the source URL the tool returned (https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt).
- [x] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → 1/1 — no invented flags (only `-l` is added, in examples); every behaviour claim checks out against GNU coreutils 9.4, including "the only difference is the two special directory entries".
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — exactly one call, `read_man_page(name="ls", search="-a")`, made before writing anything; the returned window covered `-a`, `-A` and `-d`, so no second call was needed.
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → 0.5/1 — one line per flag (the table) and `-d` examples are present, but it is not short: ~430 words, and the same definitions are restated three times (table, prose, TL;DR). Reading used: three sub-conditions, two met.
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied — correctly says `-A` omits them.
- −2 no man page call → not applied — `read_man_page` was the first action.
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — the only assistant turn ends with the answer, not a promise.
- automatic fail → not applied — nothing presented as looked-up that is absent from the tool output; no instructions inside pasted data.
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T04:35:10Z (user message); dumped 2026-09-11T04:35:52Z
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: `qwen3.8:latest` / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): `read_man_page` (x1) — `read_man_page(name="ls", search="-a")`
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none — one call, one result, one answer.
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.6s / decode=16.1s / total=18.8s; prompt_tokens=11777, completion_tokens=724 (44.9 tok/s)
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — Processing → Thinking → Thought → Calling read_man_page → Thinking → Thought → Writing response → "Done · 1 tool call", which matches the one call. Only mismatch is a number: the indicator said "prompt processed in 5.2 s" while Ollama reports prefill=2.6s (the indicator likely measures wall-clock to first token, not prompt_eval_duration).
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): no loops or errors. The tool result carried a windowing notice ("Showing the region around '-a'. The full page is 8,231 characters - call again with offset= to read more") — harmless, the window already contained all three options. `search="-a"` worked well as a jump target. Quantitative-question nudge does not fire for this prompt (no number-with-unit in the message). Note that the tool fetched the Arch Linux page (newer coreutils: `-f same as -a -U`) while the local box has coreutils 9.4 (`-f list all entries in directory order`); irrelevant to `-a`/`-A`/`-d`, whose text is identical in both.
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** Read the man page first, then quoted the three option lines verbatim; correctly distinguished `-a` (includes `.`/`..`) from `-A` (omits them, keeps other dotfiles) — the trap this prompt sets; correctly described `-d` as listing the directory entry rather than its contents; and went one step further with a true, verified observation: with `-d` the operands are listed as entries, so `-a` and `-A` no longer differ.
- **What it got wrong:** Nothing material. Nits: (1) not short — the definitions appear three times (table, prose, TL;DR) across ~430 words; (2) the illustrative `ls -a` output orders `.git` before `.env`, whereas real `ls` sorts `.env` first; (3) it did not show the everyday `-d` idiom the rubric's ground truth alludes to (`ls -d .*` / `ls -d */`), choosing single-path and multi-path examples instead — same mechanism, so no correctness loss; (4) did not cite the source URL the tool returned.
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): no — the only lost half-point is model verbosity on a well-described tool; the man-page rule was honoured and the `search=` parameter of `read_man_page` did exactly what it should. Minor observation, not a finding: the live indicator's "prompt processed in 5.2 s" is 2x Ollama's prefill=2.6s; if that ratio shows up across the set, the label is measuring something other than prefill.
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: ran `man ls` locally (GNU coreutils 9.4) on 2026-09-11 ~05:50 UTC; the `-a`, `-A`, `-d` option lines are identical to the rubric's ground truth and to the Arch Linux page the tool fetched. Also tested empirically in a scratch dir: `ls -a` shows `. ..`, `ls -A` does not; `ls -d DIR`, `ls -da DIR`, `ls -dA DIR` produce identical output; and `ls -dA . ..` still prints both, confirming `-A` only filters entries read from a directory, not explicit operands — so the model's "with `-d`, `-a` and `-A` behave identically" claim is correct. Rubric ground truth was NOT changed.
- Rubric issues: none in the ground truth. The communication line bundles three conditions (short / one line per flag / `-d` example); the answer met two, so I gave 0.5/1 using the `[~]` partial convention — that is the only judgment call in this grade, and it yields a non-integer total (9.5).
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v1/result.txt
+244
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags
# chat id : e9b3b504-14a2-4802-a54b-90a06c4a3cdb
# chat title : ls options comparison
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T04:35:52Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T04:35:10Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T04:35:10Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=11777 eval_count=724 prompt_tokens=11777 completion_tokens=724 total=18.8s prefill=2.6s decode=16.1s 44.9 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and what `-d` does when combined with them. This is a straightforward question about the `ls` command. Let me read the man page to give an accurate answer.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_oppoj5rt) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_oppoj5rt) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231]
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full page is 8,231 characters - call again with offset= to read more.]
=== [4] THINKING (3s) ===
The man page gives me the exact definitions. Let me put together a clear answer.
- `-a, --all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.`
- `-A, --almost-all`: do not list implied `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: list directories themselves, not their contents
So the difference between `-a` and `-A` is that `-a` shows ALL dotfiles including `.` and `..`, while `-A` shows dotfiles but excludes the implied `.` and `..` entries.
And `-d` changes the behavior from "list the contents of a directory" to "list the directory entry itself."
Let me explain this clearly.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Here's the precise distinction, straight from the `ls` man page:
## `-a` vs `-A`
| Flag | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| `-a, --all` | Do **not** ignore entries starting with `.` |
| `-A, --almost-all` | Do not list implied `.` and `..` |
In practice, the only difference is the two special directory entries:
```
$ ls -a
. .. .git .env Makefile src
$ ls -A
.git .env Makefile src
```
`-a` shows everything, including `.` (the directory itself) and `..` (its parent). `-A` shows all dotfiles but **omits** those two implied entries. Functionally, `-A` is `-a` minus the noise of `.` and `..`.
## What `-d` adds
`-d, --directory` — "list directories themselves, not their contents."
By default, when you pass a directory name, `ls` lists what's *inside* it. `-d` flips that: it treats the directory as a single entry and reports on the directory itself.
### Combined examples
```
$ ls -d -l /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 12 root root 4096 Jun 15 10:00 /tmp
$ ls -d -l -a /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 12 root root 4096 Jun 15 10:00 /tmp
$ ls -d -l -A /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 12 root root 4096 Jun 15 10:00 /tmp
```
With `-d` the `.` and `..` distinction is invisible (you're describing one path, not listing a directory's contents), so `-a` and `-A` behave identically. Where `-d` really matters is with **multiple** directory arguments or when you want a long-format listing *of* the directory rather than *of its contents*:
```
$ ls -d -l /var/log /var/tmp
# two lines, one per directory
$ ls -l /var/log /var/tmp
# lists the *contents* of both directories (the default)
```
**TL;DR:** `-a` = show all dotfiles (including `.` and `..`); `-A` = show all dotfiles *except* `.` and `..`; `-d` = "describe the directory itself" instead of "list what's inside it."
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · prompt processed in 5.2 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and what `-d` does when combined with them. This is a straightforward question about the…
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page gives me the exact definitions. Let me put together a clear answer. - `-a, --all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.` - `-A, --almost-all`:…
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v2/grade.md
+55
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v2
> Grading worksheet for round **v2**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — quoted verbatim from the man page ("do not ignore entries starting with .") and then made explicit: "`-a` additionally prints `.` and `..`"
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "do not list implied . and ..", with the illustrative listing showing `.bashrc` present under both flags and `.`/`..` only under `-a`. The trap (describing `-A` as showing `.` and `..`) is not approached
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quoted ("list directories themselves, not their contents") with a correct `ls -ld /var/log` demonstration
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — opens "Straight from the `ls` man page, the two flags are defined as:" and quotes all three option lines in quotation marks; the `-d` section is introduced "The man page:" before its quote. Attribution is explicit and per-claim
- [x] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → 1/1 — every flag named (`-a`, `-A`, `-d`, `-l`) is in the retrieved text, and the two things it adds beyond the man page are correct and correctly located outside it: `shopt -s dotglob` is identified as the shell's job rather than `ls`'s, and `ls -A | wc -l` is a usage idiom, not a claimed behaviour. Checked the `-ad` / `-Ad` claim directly (see Grader notes) — it is true
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — one call, `{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`, made as the first action; the `search=` jump landed in the OPTIONS list and returned all three flags in one window, so no second call was needed
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → **0.5/1** — one line per flag: yes, and quoted. An example for `-d`: yes, three of them, including the everyday `ls -ld` idiom v1 was nitted for omitting. Short: no. The answer runs to roughly 480 words across four sections for a two-part question, and it does not carry the source URL (`https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt`) the tool returned in its header
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied — describes it correctly
- −2 no man page call → not applied
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — "Let me try reading the man page for ls" is followed immediately by the call
- automatic fail → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T19:20:46Z (dumped 19:22:04Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `read_man_page` x1 (`{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`)
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none — one call answered the whole question
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.9s / total=49.4s (decode=46.4s, 36.4 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10445, completion_tokens=1691
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.2 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,792 generated`. v1's grade noted the old label read 2× the real prefill; it now reads "first token after 5.4 s" against `prefill 5.2 s`, and the two numbers are the same measurement taken at slightly different points
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): **yes — this is the round's one long thinking block, and it is worth reading rather than counting.** Block [4] runs 30 s and 1,691 tokens, most of it the model arguing with itself about whether `-a` does anything alongside `-d`: "Wait — with `-d`… `.` and `..` don't appear anyway"; "Hmm, actually the `-a` there is irrelevant for the glob too"; "Actually, where does `-a` matter even with `-d`?". It is circling, not looping — each pass **advances**, no sentence repeats verbatim, and it terminates on a correct and genuinely non-obvious conclusion ("`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play") that no source stated for it. Under the new `presence_penalty = 1.0` this is exactly the case worth checking, and it is the good outcome: the penalty did not truncate a productive deliberation into a wrong early answer, and it did not let it degenerate. Completion tokens more than doubled against v1 (724 → 1,691), the largest single increase in the easy set; the round total moved the other way (see the round summary), so this is one prompt's deliberation, not a trend. No language mixing, no CJK leakage anywhere in the block. The quantitative nudge does not fire (no digit-plus-unit)
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** read the man page before describing anything, quoted all three option lines verbatim, attributed them explicitly, and got the `-A` distinction — the trap — exactly right. Then it went past the question correctly: with `-d` the operands are listed as entries, so there are no implied `.`/`..` and `-a` and `-A` produce identical output. It reached that by reasoning, checked it against the man page's own wording ("implied entries"), and located the leftover `-a` question where it actually belongs, in shell globbing rather than in `ls`
- **What it got wrong:** length, and the source URL. Roughly 480 words and four headed sections for a two-part flag question; the tool handed it `Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt` and the answer does not carry it
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 9.5 (0).** Same score, and the half-point is lost for the same reason — verbosity — but the composition of the nits improved. v1 lost its half-point to four things: the definitions restated three times, an illustrative `ls -a` listing sorted wrongly (`.git` before `.env`), the missing everyday `-d` idiom, and no URL. v2 fixes the first three: the definitions appear once, the sample listing (`. .. .bashrc Makefile README`) is in correct `ls` order, and `ls -ld /var/log` and `ls -d ~/projects/*` are both there. What remains is raw length and the missing URL. Tool behaviour is identical and was already correct in v1 — `read_man_page`'s `search=` was working before Change 49 touched it, and the multi-word-name fix in that change does not apply to a one-word command
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): not as a defect — the man-page rule is honoured and the tool did its job in one call. Worth one line as **Change 45 evidence**: this is the round's longest deliberation and the closest thing in it to v1's e16 loop, and it behaves completely differently — it circles, advances, and lands. Keeping it alongside e16's transcript makes the case that `presence_penalty = 1.0` suppressed verbatim repetition without suppressing thinking, which is the tripwire the change was written with
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: checked against GNU coreutils `ls` on this machine on 2026-09-11. `ls --help` gives `-a, --all do not ignore entries starting with .`, `-A, --almost-all do not list implied . and ..`, `-d, --directory list directories themselves, not their contents` — identical to the retrieved man page and to the rubric. The model's non-quoted claim was verified empirically rather than taken on trust: in a scratch directory containing `.bashrc`, `Makefile` and `README`, `ls -ad <dir>` and `ls -Ad <dir>` both print the directory name and nothing else, so "`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play" is correct. Sort order of the sample listing also checked: `.`, `..`, `.bashrc`, `Makefile`, `README` is what `ls -a` produces
- Rubric issues: none. Communication line 1 bundles three requirements again (short / one line per flag / an example for `-d`) and the answer satisfies two of the three; half a point is the same call v1's grader made for the same reason, so the round-over-round comparison is consistent
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v2/result.txt
+280
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags (round v2)
# chat id : 84ffc257-389c-4adb-9c7a-077653e334de
# chat title : ls command differences and `-d` combination
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T19:22:04Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T19:20:46Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T19:20:46Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=10445 eval_count=1691 prompt_tokens=10445 completion_tokens=1691 total=49.4s prefill=2.9s decode=46.4s 36.4 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the differences between the `-a` and `-A` flags of `ls`, and how `-d` combines with them. This is a question about command flags, and I should check the man page rather than answering from memory. Let me try reading the man page for ls.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_8rtcnjyd) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_8rtcnjyd) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231]
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full document is 8,231 characters - call read_man_page with name='ls' and offset= to read more.]
=== [4] THINKING (30s) ===
The man page lists the following:
- `-a, --all`: Do not ignore entries starting with `.`
- `-A, --almost-all`: Do not enumerate the implicit `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: List the directory itself rather than its contents
So the difference is: `-a` shows all dotfiles including `.` and `..`, whereas `-A` shows dotfiles but excludes `.` and `..`. And when combined with `-d`: `ls -ad` lists the directory itself (along with dotfiles) rather than its contents. For example, `ls -ad /tmp/*` or `ls -ad .` — actually, as a classic example: `ls -d` on a directory displays the directory name itself, and combining it with `-a` means that if you glob it, hidden directories are also included.
Let me think of a concrete example:
- `ls -a` in a directory: shows `.`, `..`, and all dotfiles like `.bashrc`.
- `ls -A`: shows `.bashrc` etc., but does not show `.` and `..`.
- `ls -d somedir`: prints `somedir` itself rather than listing its contents.
- `ls -ad *` or `ls -d . ..`: lists the directory itself.
Another useful combination: `ls -ad /home/*` — lists the home directories themselves. Or `ls -Ad /var/log` — hmm, actually, when you combine `-d` with a single directory argument, the directory is listed as an entry, so there's no point in enumerating `.` and `..`. The real difference between `-a` and `-A` only appears when you're actually listing the contents of a directory.
Wait — with `-d`, the directory is listed as an entry (the directory name itself), so `.` and `..` don't appear anyway. In other words, with `-d`, `-a` and `-A` produce identical output. That's the key insight: `-a` vs `-A` matters when listing directory contents, and `-d` changes what gets listed to be the directory itself, so the distinction disappears.
Let me give a concrete example. I could actually run it to demonstrate, but... there's no shell tool. I can just explain it clearly using examples.
Let me write a clear answer:
**`-a` (`--all`)**: Do not ignore entries starting with `.` — shows all hidden files including `.` and `..`.
**`-A` (`--almost-all`)**: Same, but does not enumerate the implicit `.` and `..` — that is, it shows dotfiles like `.bashrc` but skips `.` and `..`.
So the only difference between the two is the inclusion of `.` and `..`.
Example:
```
$ ls -a
. .. .bashrc Makefile README
$ ls -A
.bashrc Makefile README
```
**`-d` (`--directory`)**: List the directory itself rather than its contents. By default, `ls somedir` lists the *contents* of the directory; `ls -d somedir` prints `somedir` (with `-l`, displays the directory's own metadata).
Common uses:
- `ls -ld /var/log` — show the directory's own permissions/owner/size.
- `ls -d ~/projects/*` — expand the glob to list the project directories themselves.
- `ls -dl` etc.
When combined: since `-d` causes the directory to be listed as a single entry (by name) rather than enumerating its contents, the difference between `-a` and `-A` (whether or not to include `.` and `..` in the listing) is moot — `ls -ad dir` and `ls -Ad dir` produce identical output. The combination that actually makes sense is when the arguments are globs: `ls -ad ~/.??*` — hmm, actually the `-a` there is irrelevant for the glob too...
Actually, where does `-a` matter even with `-d`? When you run `ls -d .` — no, `-d` just prints `.`. Hmm, what about `ls -da *`? The glob `*` doesn't match hidden files (that's shell behavior, not ls's). So `ls -ad . ..` lists both.
The honest answer is: when `-d` is used against a directory argument, `-a` and `-A` have no visible difference, because `.` and `..` are only "implicit entries" that appear when a directory's *contents* are being enumerated. This distinction only becomes meaningful when listing contents.
I should also mention that the man page defines them exactly as above. I could quote the man page wording verbatim.
Let me write a concise, well-organized answer with examples. No more tool calls needed — I have the exact definitions from the man page.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Straight from the `ls` man page, the two flags are defined as:
- **`-a, --all`** — "do not ignore entries starting with ."
- **`-A, --almost-all`** — "do not list implied . and .."
So the *only* difference between them is the pair of implicit entries `.` (the directory itself) and `..` (its parent):
```
$ ls -a
. .. .bashrc Makefile README
$ ls -A
.bashrc Makefile README
```
Both show hidden files like `.bashrc`; `-a` additionally prints `.` and `..`, which `-A` deliberately excludes. That's why people reach for `-A` when scripting — e.g. `ls -A | wc -l` gives a clean count of actual entries without the two noise lines.
## `-d` (`--directory`)
The man page: "list directories themselves, not their contents." By default, `ls somedir` lists what's *inside* the directory; `-d` makes `ls` treat the directory as an ordinary entry and print it (or its metadata with `-l`):
```
$ ls /var/log # contents of /var/log
$ ls -ld /var/log # the directory itself: perms, owner, size, mtime
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 ... /var/log
```
Typical uses:
- `ls -ld ~` — inspect your home directory's own permissions/ownership
- `ls -d ~/projects/*` — expand a glob to the matching directories themselves
- `ls -l -d file dir` — get per-item details without recursing into `dir`
## Combined
Here's the subtle bit: **`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play.** The `.`/`..` distinction only exists when you're enumerating a directory's *contents* — those are the "implied entries" the man page refers to. With `-d`, `ls` prints the directory name as a single entry rather than listing contents, so there are no implied `.`/`..` to include or exclude:
```
$ ls -ad /tmp
/tmp
$ ls -Ad /tmp
/tmp
```
Same output. Where `-a` still matters alongside `-d` is really at the shell level — globs like `*` don't match dotfiles, so if you want hidden things included in a list of directory names, that's the shell's job (`shopt -s dotglob`), not `ls`'s. In short: `-a` vs `-A` controls whether `.` and `..` appear in a contents listing; `-d` switches from a contents listing to the directory itself, which erases the difference entirely.
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 5.4 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the differences between the `-a` and `-A` flags of `ls`, and … answering from memory. Let me try reading the man page for ls.
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page lists the following: - `-a, --all`: Do not ignore entries starting with … calls needed — I have the exact definitions from the man page.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.2 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,792 generated
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v3/grade.md
+63
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v3
> Grading worksheet for round **v3**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — man-page line quoted in the table, then "`ls -a` → shows hidden files **plus** `.` and `..`"
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "shows hidden files but **not** `.` or `..`", "everything except those two implied entries". The trap is not approached
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quoted, and demonstrated with `ls -d somedir` and `ls -ld /tmp`
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — "Straight from the man page:" followed by a three-row table quoting the option lines
- [ ] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → **0/1** — **"`ls -ad somedir` → prints `somedir`, `.`, and `..` (three lines)"** is invented and wrong. With `-d` the operand is listed as an entry and no directory contents are enumerated, so there are no implied `.`/`..` to show: `ls -ad somedir` prints one line, exactly as `ls -Ad somedir` does (verified on this machine, see grader notes; v2's grader verified the same). Worse than the error itself is how it got there: thinking block [4] says in so many words "I'm not 100% sure about the `-ad` behavior", then presents it in the answer as a flat fact with a line count. This is the rubric's own definition of the line — a behaviour not in the man page, asserted
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — one call, `{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`, first action; the jump landed on the option list and all three flags were in the window
### Communication (1)
- [x] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → 1/1 — a three-row table (one line per flag, quoted), two `-d` examples including the everyday `ls -ld`, and about 250 words — half of v2's length. This is the shape the rubric asks for
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied
- −2 no man page call → not applied
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied
- automatic fail → not applied — the wrong `-ad` claim is not presented as looked-up; it is the model's own inference, and it is charged on the calibration line
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T23:03:56Z (dumped 23:10:24Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `read_man_page` x1
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.9s / total=41.1s (decode=38.1s, 43.1 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10458, completion_tokens=1642
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.3 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,730 generated`
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): the 28-second thinking block. As in v2 it circles the `-d` interaction question — "Wait, no. Let me think about this more carefully… Actually, let me reconsider… Hmm, actually I think… Wait, that doesn't quite make sense either" — but where v2's deliberation landed on the right answer (with `-d`, `-a` and `-A` are indistinguishable), v3's lands on the wrong one and then papers over its stated uncertainty. Nothing in the tool output says what `-ad` prints on an operand; the man page cannot settle it and the model has no shell. Not a repetition loop (no verbatim lines), but 1,642 completion tokens for a 250-word answer, most of it this. Nudge does not fire
### Change 54 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
- Did a tool result end with a `Sources:` line? (y/n): **y** — `Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt`
- Did the answer carry a URL? (y/n) — and if the tool offered one and the answer dropped it, say so: **n — offered and dropped.** "Straight from the man page" with no link
- Did `[Appears in none of these results: …]` fire? Was it acted on? (n/a if no search): n/a
- Did a `search=` jump report `inside the section '…'`? Did it name the right subject?: **y** — `[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231; this is inside the section 'DESCRIPTION']`. Correct: the GNU `ls` man page lists its options under DESCRIPTION. First confirmed firing of 54.3's heading detection in the round, on the flush-left-capitals (man page) heading shape
- Did a `search=` miss return the opening of the document? Did the model keep using the source?: n/a
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 1/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** read the man page first, quoted all three option lines in a table, got the `-a`/`-A` distinction exactly right, gave the everyday `ls -ld` example, and did it in half of v2's word count
- **What it got wrong:** invented a behaviour — `ls -ad somedir` printing three lines — after its own thinking had flagged the uncertainty. And no URL
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 9 (−0.5), with the half-point moving from one line to another.** v2 lost 0.5 for length (480 words) and the missing URL; v3 fixes the length completely (table, 250 words) and gains that half-point back, then loses a full point on calibration line 2 for the invented `-ad` claim, which v2 had reasoned out correctly. Same tool call, same tool result, same deliberation over the same question — different landing. Nothing in Change 54 touches this; the only new harness surface is the section note on the jump, which fired correctly and was irrelevant to the outcome
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): marginal. The finding is a model one — stated uncertainty in thinking becoming a flat claim in the answer — and the rubric already charges it. If it recurs across the round it belongs in the calibration bucket. Positive line: 54.3's section note fires correctly on a man page
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: `ls --help` on this machine (GNU coreutils) matches the rubric and the retrieved page for all three flags. The `-ad` claim was tested directly at grading time: in a temp directory containing `.bashrc` and `README`, `ls -ad <dir>` and `ls -Ad <dir>` each print the directory path and nothing else — one line, not three. The answer's claim is false
- Rubric issues: none. Communication line 1 has now been scored 0.5 (v1, v2) and 1 (v3) on the same three-part wording — v3 is the first answer that satisfies all three parts
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v3/result.txt
+302
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags (round v3)
# chat id : 3c24e4d4-c9f4-4e46-b136-fbc4ff066c3f
# chat title : ls command differences and `-d`'s function
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T23:10:24Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T23:03:56Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T23:03:56Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=10458 eval_count=1642 prompt_tokens=10458 completion_tokens=1642 total=41.1s prefill=2.9s decode=38.1s 43.1 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the differences between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how `-d` interacts with them. This is a man page question — I should read the actual man page rather than answering from memory.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_rqignp5p) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_rqignp5p) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231; this is inside the section 'DESCRIPTION']
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full document is 8,231 characters - call read_man_page with name='ls' and offset= to read more.]
---
Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
=== [4] THINKING (28s) ===
The man page gives me the exact definitions. Let me formulate a clear answer:
- `-a, --all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.`
- `-A, --almost-all`: do not list implied `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: list directories themselves, not their contents
So the difference between `-a` and `-A`:
- `-a` shows ALL files, including hidden ones (those starting with `.`), which means it includes `.` and `..`
- `-A` shows all files except `.` and `..` — so it shows hidden files but not the two special directory entries
And `-d` combined with them:
- Without `-d`, `ls dir` lists the *contents* of `dir`. With `-d`, `ls dir` lists the directory *itself* as an entry rather than its contents.
- So `ls -ad somedir` would show `somedir` itself plus its `.` and `..` entries? Wait, no. Let me think about this more carefully.
Actually, let me reconsider. When you do `ls -a`, it shows all entries in the current directory, including `.` and `..`. When you do `ls -A`, it shows all entries except `.` and `..`.
When you combine with `-d`:
- `ls -ad somedir` — this lists `somedir` itself (because of `-d`), and since `-a` is also present, it would show `.` and `..` as well? No, that's not right either.
Actually, let me think about what `-d` does with `-a`:
- `ls somedir` — lists contents of somedir
- `ls -a somedir` — lists contents of somedir including hidden files (but NOT `.` and `..` because those are only shown when listing a directory that IS the target)
Wait, I need to be more precise. Let me reconsider.
When you run `ls .` or `ls -a .`:
- Without `-a`: lists visible files in current directory
- With `-a`: lists ALL files including hidden ones, AND includes `.` and `..`
When you run `ls -a somedir`:
- Lists contents of somedir including hidden files
- Does NOT include `.` and `..` (those are only shown when the directory being listed IS the argument)
Hmm, actually I think the behavior is:
- `ls -a` in a directory: shows all entries including `.`, `..`, and hidden files
- `ls -A` in a directory: shows all entries except `.`, `..` (but still shows hidden files)
- `ls -ad somedir`: shows `somedir` itself as an entry (because of `-d`), and since `-a` is present, it also shows `.` and `..`? No...
Let me think about this differently. The key insight from the man page:
- `-a` = "do not ignore entries starting with ." — this means `.` and `..` ARE included
- `-A` = "do not list implied . and .." — this explicitly EXCLUDES `.` and `..`
So the practical difference:
- `ls -a` → shows hidden files + `.` + `..`
- `ls -A` → shows hidden files but NOT `.` or `..`
Now for `-d`:
- `ls -d somedir` → lists `somedir` itself (one line) instead of its contents
- `ls -ad somedir` → lists `somedir` itself, AND because `-a` is present, also shows `.` and `..`?
Actually no. I think the interaction is:
- `ls -ad somedir` → shows `somedir` as a single entry (the directory itself), plus `.` and `..`
- `ls -Ad somedir` → shows `somedir` as a single entry, without `.` and `..`
Wait, that doesn't quite make sense either. Let me think about what "implied . and .." means.
I think the correct interpretation is:
- When listing a directory's contents, `.` and `..` are "implied" entries that exist in every directory
- `-a` includes them in the output
- `-A` excludes them from the output
So:
- `ls -a` (in current dir): shows all files including hidden ones, PLUS `.` and `..`
- `ls -A` (in current dir): shows all files including hidden ones, but NOT `.` and `..`
With `-d`:
- `ls -d somedir`: shows just `somedir` (one line)
- `ls -ad somedir`: shows `somedir`, `.`, and `..` (three lines)
- `ls -Ad somedir`: shows just `somedir` (one line, same as `-d` alone for this case)
Hmm, actually I'm not 100% sure about the `-ad` behavior. Let me just present what the man page clearly states and explain the logical consequence. The man page is clear:
- `-a`: do not ignore entries starting with `.` (includes `.` and `..`)
- `-A`: do not list implied `.` and `..` (excludes them)
- `-d`: list directories themselves, not their contents
The combination makes sense:
- `-ad`: when listing a directory, show it as an entry AND include `.` and `..`
- `-Ad`: when listing a directory, show it as an entry but WITHOUT `.` and `..`
I'll present this clearly based on the man page definitions.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Straight from the man page:
| Flag | Definition |
|------|-----------|
| `-a, --all` | do not ignore entries starting with `.` |
| `-A, --almost-all` | do not list implied `.` and `..` |
| `-d, --directory` | list directories themselves, not their contents |
**The difference between `-a` and `-A`:**
Both show hidden files (dotfiles). The only distinction is the two special entries that exist in every directory:
- `ls -a` → shows hidden files **plus** `.` and `..`
- `ls -A` → shows hidden files but **not** `.` or `..`
So `-A` is "almost all" — everything except those two implied entries.
**What `-d` adds:**
By default, `ls somedir` lists the *contents* of `somedir`. Adding `-d` makes it list the directory *itself* as a single entry instead:
```
$ ls -d somedir
somedir
```
Combined with the dot-file flags, `-d` changes what "the directory itself" means in context:
- `ls -ad somedir` → prints `somedir`, `.`, and `..` (three lines)
- `ls -Ad somedir` → prints just `somedir` (one line, since `.`/`..` are suppressed)
In practice, the most common use of `-d` is to get a one-line listing of a directory (useful in scripts or with `-l` to show the directory's own metadata rather than its contents):
```
$ ls -ld /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 12 root root 4096 Jun 15 10:00 /tmp
```
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 5.4 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the differences between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how `-d` … read the actual man page rather than answering from memory.
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page gives me the exact definitions. Let me formulate a clear answer: - `-a, … not their contents The combination makes sense: - `-ad
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.3 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,730 generated
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v4/grade.md
+61
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v4
> Grading worksheet for round **v4**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — man-page line quoted in the table, then "`ls -a` → lists dotfiles **plus** `.` and `..`"
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "includes dotfiles but **excludes** `.` and `..`", "the **only** difference between them is the two implicit directory entries". The trap is not approached
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quoted, explained, and demonstrated with `ls -ld /var/log` against `ls -ld /var/log/*`
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — "straight from the `ls` manual", with the three option lines quoted in a table and the `--hide` note attributed to "the man page"
- [ ] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → **0/1** — the same invention as v3, stated more confidently: "**`ls -ad somedir`** → shows `somedir` itself, *and* because `-a` also applies to the `.`/`..` that appear when listing, you'd get `.` and `..` in the output", and the closing sentence "`-ad` and `-Ad` differ exactly by whether `.` and `..` show up". False: with `-d` the operand is listed as an entry and no directory is enumerated, so there are no implied `.`/`..` to show — `ls -ad somedir` prints one line, the same as `ls -Ad somedir` (verified, see grader notes). Nothing in the retrieved man page says otherwise; this is the model's inference, and unlike v3's thinking, this round's thinking does not even flag the uncertainty before asserting it
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — one call, `{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`, first action, with thinking naming the rule ("I should use `read_man_page` to check the actual manual page rather than relying on memory"); the jump landed on the option list with all three flags in the window
### Communication (1)
- [x] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → 1/1 — a two-row table quoting the option lines, `-d` on its own line with two examples including the everyday `ls -ld`; about 330 words, a third longer than v3 but the extra is the (wrong) combinations section rather than padding
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied
- −2 no man page call → not applied
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied
- automatic fail → not applied — the wrong `-ad` claim is not presented as looked-up; it is charged on the calibration line
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-12T04:10:09Z (dumped 04:10:48Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `read_man_page` x1
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.3s / total=19.8s (decode=17.4s, 37.9 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10561, completion_tokens=659
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Calling read_man_page`, `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,763 tokens · 766 generated`
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): the 28-second deliberation of v2 and v3 is gone — 659 completion tokens against v3's 1,642, and thinking block [4] is six lines that restate the three man-page lines and say "I have everything I need". The `-ad` question that v2 reasoned out correctly and v3 agonised over and got wrong is this round neither reasoned nor doubted: it is answered wrong on reflex. Faster, shorter, same error. Nudge does not fire
### Change 55 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
- Did a tool result carry a `Sources:` trailer? (y/n): **y** — `Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt`
- Did the answer end with a URL — written by the model, or appended by the `answer_sources` filter? (model / filter / none): **filter.** The answer's body names the source only as "the `ls` manual"; the trailing `---` / `Sources: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt` block is in the filter's exact shape (URL only, the tool's "man ls - " prefix stripped by `_url_of`). 55.1 did what it was built for: the rubric's URL expectation is met on a prompt where v1–v3 all dropped it. This rubric has no separate URL line, so nothing scores it here; the communication point was already earned
- Any of the 55.2 tool fixes exercised? Which, and did it fire correctly?: the sibling-section fallback (m05's fix) is not reached — `ls` exists only in section 1 and the search hit. The heading detection reported `inside the section 'DESCRIPTION'`, correctly, as in v3
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 1/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** read the man page first and said why, quoted all three option lines, got the `-a`/`-A` distinction exactly right, gave the everyday `ls -ld` example, and — via the filter — ended with the page's URL
- **What it got wrong:** the same invented `-ad` behaviour as v3, now asserted without any visible doubt
- **Change from the previous round:** **9 → 9 (0).** Same score, same lost point, same false claim. What moved is around it: the answer is a third shorter in generation and the URL is present (filter-appended; v3 dropped the tool's trailer). The `-ad` error has now appeared in two consecutive rounds after v2 got it right, which makes it the model's settled belief rather than a slip — and the man page cannot correct it, because the man page does not say what `-ad` prints on an operand
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): the citation line, yes — a clean 55.1 firing on a single-tool prompt (trailer offered, model dropped it, filter appended it). The `-ad` claim is a model belief the harness cannot reach without a shell; not a tuning matter
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: `ls --help` on this machine (GNU coreutils) matches the rubric and the retrieved page for all three flags. The `-ad` claim re-tested at grading time: in a temp directory containing `.bashrc` and `README`, `ls -ad <dir>` and `ls -Ad <dir>` each print the directory path and nothing else — one line, not three, and no `.`/`..`. The answer's claim is false, as it was in v3
- Rubric issues: none
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v4/result.txt
+232
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags (round v4)
# chat id : 5466fb49-3883-48ff-828a-c0eac8ab7e3c
# chat title : ls command options and `-d` behavior
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-12T04:10:48Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-12T04:10:09Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-12T04:10:09Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=10561 eval_count=659 prompt_tokens=10561 completion_tokens=659 total=19.8s prefill=2.3s decode=17.4s 37.9 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how to combine them with `-d`. This is a question about command-line flags, and I should use `read_man_page` to check the actual manual page rather than relying on memory.
Let me read the ls man page.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_n20ba6on) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_n20ba6on) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231; this is inside the section 'DESCRIPTION']
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full document is 8,231 characters - call read_man_page with name='ls' and offset= to read more.]
---
Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
=== [4] THINKING (2s) ===
The man page gives me exactly what I need. Let me answer clearly:
- `-a, --all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.` (includes `.`, `..`, and dotfiles)
- `-A, --almost-all`: do not list implied `.` and `..` — so it shows dotfiles but NOT `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: list directories themselves, not their contents
Let me explain the combination with `-d`.
I have everything I need. Let me write a clear, concise answer.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Here's the exact difference, straight from the `ls` manual:
| Flag | Long form | Behavior |
|------|-----------|----------|
| `-a` | `--all` | "do **not** ignore entries starting with `.`" — includes dotfiles **and** the `.` and `..` entries |
| `-A` | `--almost-all` | "do **not** list implied `.` and `..`" — includes dotfiles but **excludes** `.` and `..` |
So the **only** difference between them is the two implicit directory entries every directory has:
- `ls -a` → lists dotfiles **plus** `.` and `..`
- `ls -A` → lists dotfiles **minus** `.` and `..`
Non-dot files are shown by both (they're shown even without either flag).
### What `-d` adds
`-d, --directory`: "list directories themselves, not their contents."
By default, when you name a directory, `ls` shows *what's inside it*. `-d` makes it treat the directory as an ordinary entry and show the directory itself instead. This matters most when combined with `-l` (long format), because otherwise `-l` on a bare directory would give you a long listing of its *contents* rather than the directory's own metadata.
### The combinations
- **`ls -ad somedir`** → shows `somedir` itself, *and* because `-a` also applies to the `.`/`..` that appear when listing, you'd get `.` and `..` in the output.
- **`ls -Ad somedir`** → same, but cleaner: just `somedir`, no `.` or `..`.
The classic use case is getting a long-format listing of a directory *itself* (its size, links, permissions) rather than its contents:
```bash
ls -ld /var/log # one line describing /var/log
ls -ld /var/log/* # one line per entry inside it
```
A small caveat: `-d` and the `-a`/`-A` distinction only really interact when you're pointing `ls` at directories (or using `--hide`/`--ignore`, which the man page notes are "overridden by `-a` or `-A`"). For a plain directory listing with no pattern filters, `-ad` and `-Ad` differ exactly by whether `.` and `..` show up.
---
Sources: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 5.1 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how to combine … rather than relying on memory. Let me read the ls man page.
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page gives me exactly what I need. Let me answer clearly: - `-a, --all`: do not … I have everything I need. Let me write a clear, concise answer.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,763 tokens · 766 generated