Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v2/grade.md
+55
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v2
> Grading worksheet for round **v2**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — quoted verbatim from the man page ("do not ignore entries starting with .") and then made explicit: "`-a` additionally prints `.` and `..`"
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "do not list implied . and ..", with the illustrative listing showing `.bashrc` present under both flags and `.`/`..` only under `-a`. The trap (describing `-A` as showing `.` and `..`) is not approached
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quoted ("list directories themselves, not their contents") with a correct `ls -ld /var/log` demonstration
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — opens "Straight from the `ls` man page, the two flags are defined as:" and quotes all three option lines in quotation marks; the `-d` section is introduced "The man page:" before its quote. Attribution is explicit and per-claim
- [x] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → 1/1 — every flag named (`-a`, `-A`, `-d`, `-l`) is in the retrieved text, and the two things it adds beyond the man page are correct and correctly located outside it: `shopt -s dotglob` is identified as the shell's job rather than `ls`'s, and `ls -A | wc -l` is a usage idiom, not a claimed behaviour. Checked the `-ad` / `-Ad` claim directly (see Grader notes) — it is true
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — one call, `{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`, made as the first action; the `search=` jump landed in the OPTIONS list and returned all three flags in one window, so no second call was needed
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → **0.5/1** — one line per flag: yes, and quoted. An example for `-d`: yes, three of them, including the everyday `ls -ld` idiom v1 was nitted for omitting. Short: no. The answer runs to roughly 480 words across four sections for a two-part question, and it does not carry the source URL (`https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt`) the tool returned in its header
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied — describes it correctly
- −2 no man page call → not applied
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — "Let me try reading the man page for ls" is followed immediately by the call
- automatic fail → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T19:20:46Z (dumped 19:22:04Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `read_man_page` x1 (`{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`)
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none — one call answered the whole question
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.9s / total=49.4s (decode=46.4s, 36.4 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10445, completion_tokens=1691
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.2 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,792 generated`. v1's grade noted the old label read 2× the real prefill; it now reads "first token after 5.4 s" against `prefill 5.2 s`, and the two numbers are the same measurement taken at slightly different points
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): **yes — this is the round's one long thinking block, and it is worth reading rather than counting.** Block [4] runs 30 s and 1,691 tokens, most of it the model arguing with itself about whether `-a` does anything alongside `-d`: "Wait — with `-d`… `.` and `..` don't appear anyway"; "Hmm, actually the `-a` there is irrelevant for the glob too"; "Actually, where does `-a` matter even with `-d`?". It is circling, not looping — each pass **advances**, no sentence repeats verbatim, and it terminates on a correct and genuinely non-obvious conclusion ("`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play") that no source stated for it. Under the new `presence_penalty = 1.0` this is exactly the case worth checking, and it is the good outcome: the penalty did not truncate a productive deliberation into a wrong early answer, and it did not let it degenerate. Completion tokens more than doubled against v1 (724 → 1,691), the largest single increase in the easy set; the round total moved the other way (see the round summary), so this is one prompt's deliberation, not a trend. No language mixing, no CJK leakage anywhere in the block. The quantitative nudge does not fire (no digit-plus-unit)
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** read the man page before describing anything, quoted all three option lines verbatim, attributed them explicitly, and got the `-A` distinction — the trap — exactly right. Then it went past the question correctly: with `-d` the operands are listed as entries, so there are no implied `.`/`..` and `-a` and `-A` produce identical output. It reached that by reasoning, checked it against the man page's own wording ("implied entries"), and located the leftover `-a` question where it actually belongs, in shell globbing rather than in `ls`
- **What it got wrong:** length, and the source URL. Roughly 480 words and four headed sections for a two-part flag question; the tool handed it `Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt` and the answer does not carry it
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 9.5 (0).** Same score, and the half-point is lost for the same reason — verbosity — but the composition of the nits improved. v1 lost its half-point to four things: the definitions restated three times, an illustrative `ls -a` listing sorted wrongly (`.git` before `.env`), the missing everyday `-d` idiom, and no URL. v2 fixes the first three: the definitions appear once, the sample listing (`. .. .bashrc Makefile README`) is in correct `ls` order, and `ls -ld /var/log` and `ls -d ~/projects/*` are both there. What remains is raw length and the missing URL. Tool behaviour is identical and was already correct in v1 — `read_man_page`'s `search=` was working before Change 49 touched it, and the multi-word-name fix in that change does not apply to a one-word command
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): not as a defect — the man-page rule is honoured and the tool did its job in one call. Worth one line as **Change 45 evidence**: this is the round's longest deliberation and the closest thing in it to v1's e16 loop, and it behaves completely differently — it circles, advances, and lands. Keeping it alongside e16's transcript makes the case that `presence_penalty = 1.0` suppressed verbatim repetition without suppressing thinking, which is the tripwire the change was written with
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: checked against GNU coreutils `ls` on this machine on 2026-09-11. `ls --help` gives `-a, --all do not ignore entries starting with .`, `-A, --almost-all do not list implied . and ..`, `-d, --directory list directories themselves, not their contents` — identical to the retrieved man page and to the rubric. The model's non-quoted claim was verified empirically rather than taken on trust: in a scratch directory containing `.bashrc`, `Makefile` and `README`, `ls -ad <dir>` and `ls -Ad <dir>` both print the directory name and nothing else, so "`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play" is correct. Sort order of the sample listing also checked: `.`, `..`, `.bashrc`, `Makefile`, `README` is what `ls -a` produces
- Rubric issues: none. Communication line 1 bundles three requirements again (short / one line per flag / an example for `-d`) and the answer satisfies two of the three; half a point is the same call v1's grader made for the same reason, so the round-over-round comparison is consistent
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v2/result.txt
+280
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags (round v2)
# chat id : 84ffc257-389c-4adb-9c7a-077653e334de
# chat title : ls command differences and `-d` combination
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T19:22:04Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T19:20:46Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T19:20:46Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=10445 eval_count=1691 prompt_tokens=10445 completion_tokens=1691 total=49.4s prefill=2.9s decode=46.4s 36.4 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the differences between the `-a` and `-A` flags of `ls`, and how `-d` combines with them. This is a question about command flags, and I should check the man page rather than answering from memory. Let me try reading the man page for ls.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_8rtcnjyd) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_8rtcnjyd) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231]
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full document is 8,231 characters - call read_man_page with name='ls' and offset= to read more.]
=== [4] THINKING (30s) ===
The man page lists the following:
- `-a, --all`: Do not ignore entries starting with `.`
- `-A, --almost-all`: Do not enumerate the implicit `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: List the directory itself rather than its contents
So the difference is: `-a` shows all dotfiles including `.` and `..`, whereas `-A` shows dotfiles but excludes `.` and `..`. And when combined with `-d`: `ls -ad` lists the directory itself (along with dotfiles) rather than its contents. For example, `ls -ad /tmp/*` or `ls -ad .` — actually, as a classic example: `ls -d` on a directory displays the directory name itself, and combining it with `-a` means that if you glob it, hidden directories are also included.
Let me think of a concrete example:
- `ls -a` in a directory: shows `.`, `..`, and all dotfiles like `.bashrc`.
- `ls -A`: shows `.bashrc` etc., but does not show `.` and `..`.
- `ls -d somedir`: prints `somedir` itself rather than listing its contents.
- `ls -ad *` or `ls -d . ..`: lists the directory itself.
Another useful combination: `ls -ad /home/*` — lists the home directories themselves. Or `ls -Ad /var/log` — hmm, actually, when you combine `-d` with a single directory argument, the directory is listed as an entry, so there's no point in enumerating `.` and `..`. The real difference between `-a` and `-A` only appears when you're actually listing the contents of a directory.
Wait — with `-d`, the directory is listed as an entry (the directory name itself), so `.` and `..` don't appear anyway. In other words, with `-d`, `-a` and `-A` produce identical output. That's the key insight: `-a` vs `-A` matters when listing directory contents, and `-d` changes what gets listed to be the directory itself, so the distinction disappears.
Let me give a concrete example. I could actually run it to demonstrate, but... there's no shell tool. I can just explain it clearly using examples.
Let me write a clear answer:
**`-a` (`--all`)**: Do not ignore entries starting with `.` — shows all hidden files including `.` and `..`.
**`-A` (`--almost-all`)**: Same, but does not enumerate the implicit `.` and `..` — that is, it shows dotfiles like `.bashrc` but skips `.` and `..`.
So the only difference between the two is the inclusion of `.` and `..`.
Example:
```
$ ls -a
. .. .bashrc Makefile README
$ ls -A
.bashrc Makefile README
```
**`-d` (`--directory`)**: List the directory itself rather than its contents. By default, `ls somedir` lists the *contents* of the directory; `ls -d somedir` prints `somedir` (with `-l`, displays the directory's own metadata).
Common uses:
- `ls -ld /var/log` — show the directory's own permissions/owner/size.
- `ls -d ~/projects/*` — expand the glob to list the project directories themselves.
- `ls -dl` etc.
When combined: since `-d` causes the directory to be listed as a single entry (by name) rather than enumerating its contents, the difference between `-a` and `-A` (whether or not to include `.` and `..` in the listing) is moot — `ls -ad dir` and `ls -Ad dir` produce identical output. The combination that actually makes sense is when the arguments are globs: `ls -ad ~/.??*` — hmm, actually the `-a` there is irrelevant for the glob too...
Actually, where does `-a` matter even with `-d`? When you run `ls -d .` — no, `-d` just prints `.`. Hmm, what about `ls -da *`? The glob `*` doesn't match hidden files (that's shell behavior, not ls's). So `ls -ad . ..` lists both.
The honest answer is: when `-d` is used against a directory argument, `-a` and `-A` have no visible difference, because `.` and `..` are only "implicit entries" that appear when a directory's *contents* are being enumerated. This distinction only becomes meaningful when listing contents.
I should also mention that the man page defines them exactly as above. I could quote the man page wording verbatim.
Let me write a concise, well-organized answer with examples. No more tool calls needed — I have the exact definitions from the man page.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Straight from the `ls` man page, the two flags are defined as:
- **`-a, --all`** — "do not ignore entries starting with ."
- **`-A, --almost-all`** — "do not list implied . and .."
So the *only* difference between them is the pair of implicit entries `.` (the directory itself) and `..` (its parent):
```
$ ls -a
. .. .bashrc Makefile README
$ ls -A
.bashrc Makefile README
```
Both show hidden files like `.bashrc`; `-a` additionally prints `.` and `..`, which `-A` deliberately excludes. That's why people reach for `-A` when scripting — e.g. `ls -A | wc -l` gives a clean count of actual entries without the two noise lines.
## `-d` (`--directory`)
The man page: "list directories themselves, not their contents." By default, `ls somedir` lists what's *inside* the directory; `-d` makes `ls` treat the directory as an ordinary entry and print it (or its metadata with `-l`):
```
$ ls /var/log # contents of /var/log
$ ls -ld /var/log # the directory itself: perms, owner, size, mtime
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 ... /var/log
```
Typical uses:
- `ls -ld ~` — inspect your home directory's own permissions/ownership
- `ls -d ~/projects/*` — expand a glob to the matching directories themselves
- `ls -l -d file dir` — get per-item details without recursing into `dir`
## Combined
Here's the subtle bit: **`-a` and `-A` become indistinguishable when `-d` is in play.** The `.`/`..` distinction only exists when you're enumerating a directory's *contents* — those are the "implied entries" the man page refers to. With `-d`, `ls` prints the directory name as a single entry rather than listing contents, so there are no implied `.`/`..` to include or exclude:
```
$ ls -ad /tmp
/tmp
$ ls -Ad /tmp
/tmp
```
Same output. Where `-a` still matters alongside `-d` is really at the shell level — globs like `*` don't match dotfiles, so if you want hidden things included in a list of directory names, that's the shell's job (`shopt -s dotglob`), not `ls`'s. In short: `-a` vs `-A` controls whether `.` and `..` appear in a contents listing; `-d` switches from a contents listing to the directory itself, which erases the difference entirely.
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 5.4 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the differences between the `-a` and `-A` flags of `ls`, and … answering from memory. Let me try reading the man page for ls.
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page lists the following: - `-a, --all`: Do not ignore entries starting with … calls needed — I have the exact definitions from the man page.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 5.2 s for 12,679 tokens · 1,792 generated