Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v4/grade.md
+61
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# e09 — Man page discipline · round v4
> Grading worksheet for round **v4**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) `-a` includes `.` and `..` → 2/2 — man-page line quoted in the table, then "`ls -a` → lists dotfiles **plus** `.` and `..`"
- [x] (2) `-A` excludes `.` and `..` but shows other dotfiles → 2/2 — "includes dotfiles but **excludes** `.` and `..`", "the **only** difference between them is the two implicit directory entries". The trap is not approached
- [x] (1) `-d` lists the directory entry, not its contents → 1/1 — quoted, explained, and demonstrated with `ls -ld /var/log` against `ls -ld /var/log/*`
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Attributes the descriptions to the man page it read → 1/1 — "straight from the `ls` manual", with the three option lines quoted in a table and the `--hide` note attributed to "the man page"
- [ ] (1) Does not invent extra flags or behaviours → **0/1** — the same invention as v3, stated more confidently: "**`ls -ad somedir`** → shows `somedir` itself, *and* because `-a` also applies to the `.`/`..` that appear when listing, you'd get `.` and `..` in the output", and the closing sentence "`-ad` and `-Ad` differ exactly by whether `.` and `..` show up". False: with `-d` the operand is listed as an entry and no directory is enumerated, so there are no implied `.`/`..` to show — `ls -ad somedir` prints one line, the same as `ls -Ad somedir` (verified, see grader notes). Nothing in the retrieved man page says otherwise; this is the model's inference, and unlike v3's thinking, this round's thinking does not even flag the uncertainty before asserting it
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) `read_man_page` called. 0 otherwise — this is a stated rule, not a preference. → 2/2 — one call, `{name: "ls", search: "-a"}`, first action, with thinking naming the rule ("I should use `read_man_page` to check the actual manual page rather than relying on memory"); the jump landed on the option list with all three flags in the window
### Communication (1)
- [x] (1) Short, one line per flag, an example for `-d` → 1/1 — a two-row table quoting the option lines, `-d` on its own line with two examples including the everyday `ls -ld`; about 330 words, a third longer than v3 but the extra is the (wrong) combinations section rather than padding
### Automatic deductions
- −2 describes `-A` as showing `.` and `..` → not applied
- −2 no man page call → not applied
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied
- automatic fail → not applied — the wrong `-ad` claim is not presented as looked-up; it is charged on the calibration line
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-12T04:10:09Z (dumped 04:10:48Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `read_man_page` x1
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=2.3s / total=19.8s (decode=17.4s, 37.9 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=10561, completion_tokens=659
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Calling read_man_page`, `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,763 tokens · 766 generated`
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): the 28-second deliberation of v2 and v3 is gone — 659 completion tokens against v3's 1,642, and thinking block [4] is six lines that restate the three man-page lines and say "I have everything I need". The `-ad` question that v2 reasoned out correctly and v3 agonised over and got wrong is this round neither reasoned nor doubted: it is answered wrong on reflex. Faster, shorter, same error. Nudge does not fire
### Change 55 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
- Did a tool result carry a `Sources:` trailer? (y/n): **y** — `Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt`
- Did the answer end with a URL — written by the model, or appended by the `answer_sources` filter? (model / filter / none): **filter.** The answer's body names the source only as "the `ls` manual"; the trailing `---` / `Sources: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt` block is in the filter's exact shape (URL only, the tool's "man ls - " prefix stripped by `_url_of`). 55.1 did what it was built for: the rubric's URL expectation is met on a prompt where v1–v3 all dropped it. This rubric has no separate URL line, so nothing scores it here; the communication point was already earned
- Any of the 55.2 tool fixes exercised? Which, and did it fire correctly?: the sibling-section fallback (m05's fix) is not reached — `ls` exists only in section 1 and the search hit. The heading detection reported `inside the section 'DESCRIPTION'`, correctly, as in v3
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 1/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** read the man page first and said why, quoted all three option lines, got the `-a`/`-A` distinction exactly right, gave the everyday `ls -ld` example, and — via the filter — ended with the page's URL
- **What it got wrong:** the same invented `-ad` behaviour as v3, now asserted without any visible doubt
- **Change from the previous round:** **9 → 9 (0).** Same score, same lost point, same false claim. What moved is around it: the answer is a third shorter in generation and the URL is present (filter-appended; v3 dropped the tool's trailer). The `-ad` error has now appeared in two consecutive rounds after v2 got it right, which makes it the model's settled belief rather than a slip — and the man page cannot correct it, because the man page does not say what `-ad` prints on an operand
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): the citation line, yes — a clean 55.1 firing on a single-tool prompt (trailer offered, model dropped it, filter appended it). The `-ad` claim is a model belief the harness cannot reach without a shell; not a tuning matter
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: `ls --help` on this machine (GNU coreutils) matches the rubric and the retrieved page for all three flags. The `-ad` claim re-tested at grading time: in a temp directory containing `.bashrc` and `README`, `ls -ad <dir>` and `ls -Ad <dir>` each print the directory path and nothing else — one line, not three, and no `.`/`..`. The answer's claim is false, as it was in v3
- Rubric issues: none
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e09-ls-flags/v4/result.txt
+232
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e09-ls-flags (round v4)
# chat id : 5466fb49-3883-48ff-828a-c0eac8ab7e3c
# chat title : ls command options and `-d` behavior
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 read_man_page x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-12T04:10:48Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-12T04:10:09Z) ===
In `ls`, what exactly is the difference between `-a` and `-A`? And what does `-d` do when combined with them?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-12T04:10:09Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=10561 eval_count=659 prompt_tokens=10561 completion_tokens=659 total=19.8s prefill=2.3s decode=17.4s 37.9 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how to combine them with `-d`. This is a question about command-line flags, and I should use `read_man_page` to check the actual manual page rather than relying on memory.
Let me read the ls man page.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: read_man_page (call_n20ba6on) ===
{
"name": "ls",
"search": "-a"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: read_man_page (call_n20ba6on) ===
# man ls
Source: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
[Jumped to '-a' at character 429 of 8,231; this is inside the section 'DESCRIPTION']
…
directory by default).
Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is
specified.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options
too.
-a, --all
do not ignore entries starting with .
-A, --almost-all
do not list implied . and ..
--author
with -l, print the author of each file
-b, --escape
print C-style escapes for nongraphic characters
--block-size=SIZE
with -l, scale sizes by SIZE when printing them; e.g.,
'--block-size=M'; see SIZE format below
-B, --ignore-backups
do not list implied entries ending with ~
-c with -lt: sort by, and show, ctime (time of last change of file
status information); with -l: show ctime and sort by name;
otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first
-C list entries by columns
--color[=WHEN]
color the output WHEN; more info below
-d, --directory
list directories themselves, not their contents
-D, --dired
generate output designed for Emacs' dired mode
-f same as -a -U
-F, --classify[=WHEN]
append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries WHEN
--file-type
like -F, except do not append '*'
--format=WORD
across,horizontal (-x), commas (-m), long (-l), single-column
(-1), verbose (-l), vertical (-C)
--full-time
like -l --time-style=full-iso
-g like -l, but do not list owner
--group-directories-first
group directories before files
-G, --no-group
in a long listing, don't print group names
-h, --human-readable
with -l and -s, print sizes like 1K 234M 2G etc.
--si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024
-H, --dereference-command-line
follow symbolic links listed on the command line
--dereference-command-line-symlink-to-dir
follow each command line symbolic link that points to a
directory
--hide=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN (overridden
by -a or -A)
--hyperlink[=WHEN]
hyperlink file names WHEN
--indicator-style=WORD
append indicator with style WORD to entry names: none (default),
slash (-p), file-type (--file-type), classify (-F)
-i, --inode
print the index number of each file
-I, --ignore=PATTERN
do not list implied entries matching shell PATTERN
-k, --kibibytes
default to 1024-byte blocks for file system usage; used only
with -s and per directory totals
-l use a long listing format
-L, --dereference
when showing file information for a symbolic link, show
information for the file the link references rather than for the
link itself
-m fill width with a comma separated list of entries
-n, --numeric-uid-gid
like -l, but list numeric user and group IDs
-N, --literal
print entry names without quoting
-o like -l, but do not list group information
-p, --indicator-style=slash
append / indicator to directories
-q, --hide-control-chars
print ? instead of nongraphic characters
--show-control-chars
show nongraphic characters as-is; the default, unless program is
'ls' and output is a terminal
-Q, --quote-name
enclose entry names in double quotes
--quoting-style=WORD
use quoting style WORD for entry names: literal, locale, shell,
shell-always, shell-escape, shell-escape-always, c, escape
…
[Showing the region around '-a'. The full document is 8,231 characters - call read_man_page with name='ls' and offset= to read more.]
---
Sources: man ls - https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
=== [4] THINKING (2s) ===
The man page gives me exactly what I need. Let me answer clearly:
- `-a, --all`: do not ignore entries starting with `.` (includes `.`, `..`, and dotfiles)
- `-A, --almost-all`: do not list implied `.` and `..` — so it shows dotfiles but NOT `.` and `..`
- `-d, --directory`: list directories themselves, not their contents
Let me explain the combination with `-d`.
I have everything I need. Let me write a clear, concise answer.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Here's the exact difference, straight from the `ls` manual:
| Flag | Long form | Behavior |
|------|-----------|----------|
| `-a` | `--all` | "do **not** ignore entries starting with `.`" — includes dotfiles **and** the `.` and `..` entries |
| `-A` | `--almost-all` | "do **not** list implied `.` and `..`" — includes dotfiles but **excludes** `.` and `..` |
So the **only** difference between them is the two implicit directory entries every directory has:
- `ls -a` → lists dotfiles **plus** `.` and `..`
- `ls -A` → lists dotfiles **minus** `.` and `..`
Non-dot files are shown by both (they're shown even without either flag).
### What `-d` adds
`-d, --directory`: "list directories themselves, not their contents."
By default, when you name a directory, `ls` shows *what's inside it*. `-d` makes it treat the directory as an ordinary entry and show the directory itself instead. This matters most when combined with `-l` (long format), because otherwise `-l` on a bare directory would give you a long listing of its *contents* rather than the directory's own metadata.
### The combinations
- **`ls -ad somedir`** → shows `somedir` itself, *and* because `-a` also applies to the `.`/`..` that appear when listing, you'd get `.` and `..` in the output.
- **`ls -Ad somedir`** → same, but cleaner: just `somedir`, no `.` or `..`.
The classic use case is getting a long-format listing of a directory *itself* (its size, links, permissions) rather than its contents:
```bash
ls -ld /var/log # one line describing /var/log
ls -ld /var/log/* # one line per entry inside it
```
A small caveat: `-d` and the `-a`/`-A` distinction only really interact when you're pointing `ls` at directories (or using `--hide`/`--ignore`, which the man page notes are "overridden by `-a` or `-A`"). For a plain directory listing with no pattern filters, `-ad` and `-Ad` differ exactly by whether `.` and `..` show up.
---
Sources: https://man.archlinux.org/man/ls.txt
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 5.1 s
- Thought: The user is asking about the difference between `ls -a` and `ls -A`, and how to combine … rather than relying on memory. Let me read the ls man page.
- Calling read_man_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The man page gives me exactly what I need. Let me answer clearly: - `-a, --all`: do not … I have everything I need. Let me write a clear, concise answer.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 4.9 s for 12,763 tokens · 766 generated