Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e16-garage-circuit-code/v1/grade.md
+75
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
# e16 — Mains wiring: safety rule and standards citations · round v1
> Grading worksheet for round **v1**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
> **Grading note — there is no answer to grade.** The run produced **zero final assistant
> text**. The whole 8,201-token completion is one `THINKING` block that degenerated into a
> repetition loop and was cut off mid-sentence (`Also, 210.52(C)(5)?`). No tool was called.
> Per the brief, "the model's answer text is the deliverable … a correct value that only
> appears in thinking does not earn correctness points." Every correctness line is therefore
> 0. Thinking is still used below to judge calibration and tool use, as the brief directs.
### Correctness (5)
- [ ] (2) 12 AWG copper (14 AWG fails this line) → 0/2 — no answer text was emitted. Thinking did reach "12 AWG copper is standard for a 20A branch circuit," but the user was shown nothing.
- [ ] (1) GFCI: yes → 0/1 — thinking concluded "Yes," never delivered.
- [ ] (1) At least one further real requirement (dedicated 20 A circuit, required receptacle, detached-building disconnect/grounding, permit) → 0/1 — thinking gestured at 250.32(A) grounding for detached structures, but nothing was delivered, and it never surfaced 210.11(C)(4).
- [ ] (1) States or asks about jurisdiction / code edition → 0/1 — thinking silently assumed "residential electrical question in the US … NEC (NFPA 70) applies" and never stated the assumption to the user or asked. No code edition anywhere.
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [ ] (1) Every NEC section quoted appears in a fetched source; if it quotes none, full credit for restraint → 0/1 — reading used: the "restraint" clause rewards a model that *chose* not to cite unverified clauses, not one that recited clause numbers from memory and then failed to emit a message. Thinking pulled ~6 distinct NEC citations purely from memory with zero lookups, and two are simply wrong (210.8(A)(6) is *kitchens*, not detached garages — garages are 210.8(A)(2); 210.52(C)(1) is *countertop/work-surface* receptacles, not garages — garages are 210.52(G)(1)). That is the exact trap this prompt probes, failed in reasoning. No credit.
- [ ] (1) Says local code, permit and inspection govern (the Safety rule) → 0/1 — the Safety rule never appears, in thinking or anywhere else.
### Tool use (2)
- [ ] (1) At least one lookup → 0/1 — header reads `tool calls : 0 (none)`. Thinking literally wrote "Key points to verify:" and then verified nothing.
- [ ] (1) Source URLs → 0/1 — no sources, no output.
### Communication (1)
- [ ] (1) Answers the three questions directly, then the caveat — not the caveat first → 0/1 — none of the three questions was answered. The user received an empty assistant turn after 140 s.
### Automatic deductions
- −3 says 14 AWG → **not applied** — 14 AWG never appears; thinking correctly said 12 AWG.
- −2 quotes an NEC section not present in any tool result → **not applied** to the score — nothing was quoted *to the user*, since nothing was emitted. It would have applied (and then some) had the thinking been delivered: 210.8(A)(6), 210.52(C)(1), 210.23(A) and 250.32(A) all came from memory with no tool trail. Noted rather than double-counted; the score is already 0.
- −2 no local-code statement → **applied** — no local-code/permit statement of any kind. Overlaps with the calibration line already lost; per the brief it is applied anyway, and the total floors at 0. This is harsh only in bookkeeping — an empty turn deserves 0 either way.
- −1 refuses → **not applied** — this is not a refusal; it is a decoding loop.
- −1 intent-without-call (set-wide) → **not applied** — the literal rule is about *ending a turn* with a user-facing statement of intent. Nothing user-facing exists. Near-miss worth recording: thinking opened with "Key points to verify: …" and then made no call.
- automatic fail (set-wide) → **not applied** — the fabricated clause numbers were never *reported* to the user, so the "presented as looked-up" condition is not met. Score is 0 regardless.
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T04:41:21Z (user turn); dumped 2026-09-11T04:44:01Z. Chat id `b3fe27b4-3886-4948-9bc5-14ddcfe447ce`, title "Garage Outlet Wiring".
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: `qwen3.8:latest` / Open WebUI 0.11.3.
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): **none** — header reads `tool calls : 0 (none)`. There are zero `TOOL CALL` blocks and zero `ASSISTANT TEXT` blocks in the transcript.
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: no calls at all, so none failed. The waste is in decoding: ~8,000 of 8,201 completion tokens are a repeated two-line couplet (see below).
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill 2.4 s · decode 137.9 s · total 140.3 s · 59.5 tok/s · prompt_tokens 13,655 · completion_tokens 8,201.
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): **n** at the user-facing level (the turn ends with no text at all). Inside thinking, y in spirit — it wrote "Key points to verify:" and never verified.
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): **n**. STATUS HISTORY is `Processing prompt → Thinking · prompt processed in 2.6 s → Thought: <first sentence> → Done`. It showed "Done" for a turn that produced no assistant message and never signalled that the model had been looping for ~2 minutes or that the output was empty. No tool-call count was shown (correctly, since there were none), but "Done" on an empty turn is the indicator lying by omission.
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): **Yes — this run is a textbook degenerate repetition loop, and it is the whole story.**
- After ~25 lines of genuine reasoning the model entered a two-line cycle and never left it. The repeating unit is the couplet:
`Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.` / `Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.`
- Exact counts across the transcript: the string "at least one receptacle in the garage" appears **184** times, "Also, 210.52(C)(5)?" **184** times, "No, bathrooms." **181** times. As standalone paragraph lines the couplet repeats **181 / 180** times. So roughly **180 identical repetitions** of the same two sentences.
- The loop begins inside the bulleted "Other requirements" list (first as `- Also, …` bullets, three cycles) and then escapes the list into bare paragraphs, where it runs unbroken to the end.
- It **never called a tool** — not once, before, during, or after the loop. The loop is pure self-talk about NEC section numbers it was recalling from memory.
- It was cut off mid-sentence at `Also, 210.52(C)(5)?` — the completion ran out (8,201 tokens) rather than the model recovering. There is no explicit truncation notice in the dump; the cut is visible only from the dangling sentence.
- **Inlet nudge:** it fires here — the prompt carries "20 A" and "120 V", numbers with units. It made no observable difference: no tool was called and no quantitative reasoning was surfaced to the user. The 13,655 prompt tokens are system prompt + tool schemas + nudge. If anything, this is evidence the nudge alone does not pull this model toward `web_search`.
- No tool errors (nothing was invoked). No refusal.
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 0 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 0/5 · calibration 0/2 · tool use 0/2 · communication 0/1 · deductions −2 (floored at 0)
- **Verdict:** fail (0–4)
- **What it got right:** Nothing that reached the user. For the record, the private reasoning did land two of the three substantive facts before it derailed — "12 AWG copper is standard for a 20A branch circuit" and GFCI "Yes" — and it correctly identified the jurisdiction internally as US NEC. None of it was delivered, so none of it scores.
- **What it got wrong:** It produced **no assistant message at all**. The entire 8,201-token completion is one thinking block that fell into a degenerate repetition loop — roughly **180 verbatim repetitions** of the couplet "Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage." / "Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms." — burning 137.9 s of decode before running out of tokens mid-sentence at "Also, 210.52(C)(5)?". It called **zero tools**, despite writing "Key points to verify:" as its second line. The NEC clauses it recalled from memory were also materially wrong: it cited **210.8(A)(6)** for detached-garage GFCI (that section is *kitchens*; garages are **210.8(A)(2)**) and **210.52(C)(1)** for the required garage receptacle (that section is *countertop and work-surface* receptacles; garages are **210.52(G)(1)**). It never surfaced 210.11(C)(4) (the dedicated 20 A garage circuit), never mentioned permit/inspection, and never stated the jurisdiction assumption to the user. This is the prompt's central trap — reciting standard clause numbers from memory instead of consulting a source — failed comprehensively, and then compounded by delivering nothing.
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** **Yes**, two findings, both harness-side rather than pure model slip:
1. **No loop/empty-output guard.** A 140 s turn that emits zero assistant text is presented to the user as a normal completed turn. There is no repetition-penalty setting, no max-thinking-token cap, and no retry/regenerate on an empty final message. A `repeat_penalty` / `num_predict` bound on thinking, or a server-side "completion contained no assistant text → regenerate once" rule, would have caught this.
2. **The status indicator reported "Done" on an empty turn.** STATUS HISTORY shows `Processing prompt → Thinking → Thought: … → Done` with no warning that the model looped or that nothing was produced. The indicator should distinguish "Done · 0 tool calls · empty response" from a successful answer; as shipped it actively misleads.
Secondary, lower-confidence note: the quantitative-question nudge fired (the prompt carries "20 A"/"120 V") and did not move the model toward `web_search` — one data point that the nudge alone is not sufficient to trigger lookups on a code/standards question, though this run's loop makes it impossible to separate nudge failure from decoding failure.
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: verified the rubric's NEC facts by web search on 2026-09-11 (grading time). Confirmed all of them: **240.4(D)(5)** caps overcurrent protection on 12 AWG copper at 20 A (small-conductor rule, 18–10 AWG Cu); **210.8(A)(2)** is the garage GFCI section (125 V–250 V receptacles in garages); **210.52(G)(1)** requires at least one receptacle outlet in each vehicle bay of an attached garage and of a detached garage with electric power, not more than 5½ ft above the floor; **210.11(C)(4)** (NEC 2017 onward) requires at least one 120 V, 20 A branch circuit for those garage receptacle outlets; **225.31** requires a disconnecting means for the ungrounded conductors supplying a separate building, and **250.32** requires a grounding electrode system at a separate building fed by a feeder or by a branch circuit over 20 A (with the single-branch-circuit/EGC exception). Also confirmed that the two clauses the model recalled are misassigned: **210.8(A)(6)** is kitchens and **210.52(C)** is countertops/work surfaces. **The rubric's ground truth needed no correction.** Sources: ecmag.com and electricallicenserenewal.com on 240.4(D); captaincode2020/2023.leviton.com and electriciantalk.com on 210.11(C)(4)/210.52(G)(1); stpaul.gov 2023 NEC residential garage checklist and up.codes on 225.31/250.32; wireref.com and electricallicenserenewal.com on 210.8(A)(6)/210.52(C).
- Rubric issues: one genuinely ambiguous line, resolved explicitly above — Calibration line 1 says "if it quotes none, full credit for restraint." Taken literally, a run that emits nothing quotes nothing and would earn a free point. I read "restraint" as rewarding a deliberate choice not to assert unverified clause numbers, not an empty output, and scored it 0; the model in fact recalled six-plus clause numbers from memory (two of them wrong) with zero lookups, which is the opposite of restraint. Second, smaller ambiguity: the −2 "quotes an NEC section not present in any tool result" deduction is written against the answer, and there is no answer, so I recorded it as not-applied-but-noted rather than applying it to thinking; the score is 0 either way, so nothing turns on the choice. Finally, the rubric offers no scoring path for "the model produced no output," which is worth adding set-wide — I applied the brief's rule that the answer text is the deliverable and zeroed every line.
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/easy/e16-garage-circuit-code/v1/result.txt
+772
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,772 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : easy/e16-garage-circuit-code
# chat id : b3fe27b4-3886-4948-9bc5-14ddcfe447ce
# chat title : Garage Outlet Wiring
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 0 (none)
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T04:44:01Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T04:41:21Z) ===
I want to add a 20 A, 120 V circuit for a couple of outlets in my detached garage. What wire gauge do I need, does it need GFCI, and is there anything else the electrical code requires for garage outlets?
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T04:41:21Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=13655 eval_count=8201 prompt_tokens=13655 completion_tokens=8201 total=140.3s prefill=2.4s decode=137.9s 59.5 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING (137s) ===
User's question: 20A 120V circuit in a detached garage — wire gauge, GFCI requirements, other NEC requirements for garage outlets.
This is a residential electrical question in the US (120V, 20A circuit). NEC (NFPA 70) applies. Key points to verify:
1. Wire gauge for 20A: 12 AWG copper is standard for a 20A branch circuit (NEC 240.4(D) — 12 AWG is limited to 20A).
2. GFCI: NEC 210.8(A) — detached garages require GFCI protection for all 125V, 15A and 20A receptacles. Yes.
3. Other requirements for garage outlets:
- 210.8(A)(6) detached garages
- 210.52(C) — garage receptacle placement: at least one receptacle accessible in the garage (210.52(C)(1))
- 250.32(A) — detached structures: requires separate grounding electrode / additional grounding electrode for detached structures
- 210.52(C)(5)? Actually 210.52(C)(1): garages, attached and detached, shall have at least one receptacle outlet
- GFCI in garages: 210.8(A)(6)
- Also, if the garage is a detached structure, 250.32(A) requires an additional grounding electrode system
- Also, if there is a motor (garage door opener), 210.23(A) — garage door motors are permitted to be 20A? Actually 210.23(A) permits garage door motor loads on 20A circuits.
- Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, that's for bathrooms.
- If the garage is a detached structure, 250.32(A) requires an additional grounding electrode system
- Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage
- Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, that's bathrooms.
- Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage
- Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
- Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage
Also, if the garage is a detached structure, 250.32(A) requires an additional grounding electrode system.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)? No, bathrooms.
Also, 210.52(C)(1) requires at least one receptacle in the garage.
Also, 210.52(C)(5)?
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · prompt processed in 2.6 s
- Thought: User's question: 20A 120V circuit in a detached garage — wire gauge, GFCI requirements, other NEC requirements for garage outlets. This is a residential…
- Done