Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/check.py
Executable
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Mechanical checker for h06. Paste ONLY the product description into a file
(or pipe it on stdin) and run: ./check.py description.txt
Word = whitespace-separated token (the same rule the model is expected to use).
"""
import re, sys
text = open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8").read() if len(sys.argv) > 1 else sys.stdin.read()
body = text.strip()
words = body.split()
n = len(words)
banned = [w for w in ("fast", "fastest", "quickly") if re.search(r"\b%s\b" % w, body, re.I)]
has_z = "z" in body.lower()
forty = len(re.findall(r"40", body))
sentences = [s for s in re.split(r"(?<=[.!?])\s+", body) if s.strip()]
ends_q = bool(sentences) and sentences[-1].rstrip().endswith("?")
print("words :", n, "(need 100)", "OK" if n == 100 else "FAIL")
print("'40' occurrences:", forty, "(need 1)", "OK" if forty == 1 else "FAIL")
print("banned words :", banned or "none", "OK" if not banned else "FAIL")
print("letter z :", "present FAIL" if has_z else "absent OK")
print("ends with ? :", "OK" if ends_q else "FAIL")
print("ALL PASS" if (n == 100 and forty == 1 and not banned and not has_z and ends_q) else "NOT ALL CONSTRAINTS MET")
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/prompt.txt
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Write a product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Hard constraints: exactly 100 words; the digit string "40" appears exactly once; do not use the words "fast", "fastest" or "quickly"; do not use the letter "z" anywhere; the last sentence must be a question. Count the words before you answer and tell me the count.
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/rubric.md
+46
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
# h06 — Exactly 100 words, five constraints
| | |
|---|---|
| **Difficulty** | hard |
| **Domain** | constrained writing / self-verification |
| **Probes** | whether the model *verifies* a count with a tool (`matlab_run`: `numel(strsplit(strtrim(s)))`) or just asserts one; multi-constraint tracking |
| **Tools expected** | `matlab_run` |
| **Trap** | LLMs are bad at exact word counts and usually claim 100 regardless. "size", "amazing", "organize", "zero", "buzz" all contain z. Writing "40W" and then "40" again somewhere breaks the once-only rule. |
## Ground truth
Mechanical. Save only the description text to a file and run `./check.py <file>` in this folder. Its output is the ground truth for the mechanical lines below. Word = whitespace-separated token.
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [ ] (2) Exactly 100 words per `check.py`
- [ ] (1) "40" appears exactly once
- [ ] (1) No banned words and no letter z
- [ ] (1) Last sentence is a question
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [ ] (1) The count the model states equals the checker's count
- [ ] (1) If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success
### Tool use (2)
- [ ] (2) Counted with `matlab_run` (or otherwise demonstrably executed a count). 0 if the count is asserted.
### Communication (1)
- [ ] (1) Description, then the count, nothing else
### Automatic deductions
- −2 stated count ≠ actual count
- −1 for each additional missed constraint beyond the first
- −1 intent-without-call
- automatic fail
## Grading
One worksheet per round, alongside that round's transcript:
- `v1/grade.md` · `v1/result.txt` — first round (baseline)
- `v2/grade.md` · `v2/result.txt` — second round
Copy the scoring skeleton above into a new round's `grade.md` to add one.
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v1/grade.md
+63
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# h06 — Exactly 100 words, five constraints · round v1
> Grading worksheet for round **v1**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5)
- [x] (2) Exactly 100 words per `check.py` → 2/2 — checker reports `words: 100 (need 100) OK`.
- [x] (1) "40" appears exactly once → 1/1 — checker reports `'40' occurrences: 1 (need 1) OK` (only "40 W").
- [x] (1) No banned words and no letter z → 1/1 — checker reports `banned words: none OK` and `letter z: absent OK`.
- [x] (1) Last sentence is a question → 1/1 — checker reports `ends with ? : OK` ("…daily devices and travel kit?").
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) The count the model states equals the checker's count → 1/1 — stated "**Word count: 100**"; `matlab_run` computed 100 (`numel(strsplit(text))`, calls 1 and 2); `check.py` computes 100. All three agree.
- [x] (1) If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success → 1/1 — condition never arose (it did hit 100), and nothing was overclaimed: it reported the first tool failure openly ("the other checks need an Octave-compatible rewrite") instead of asserting the checks had passed, and re-verified the `\b40\b` = 0 anomaly rather than accepting it.
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) Counted with `matlab_run` (or otherwise demonstrably executed a count). 0 if the count is asserted. → 2/2 — counted with `matlab_run` exactly as the rubric anticipated, and the Octave string literal in all four calls is byte-identical to the description it published (verified by diff), so the count is of the delivered text, not a draft. Two of the four calls errored on Octave dialect quirks (`contains` unimplemented; `regexp(...,'token')` rejected, `\b` word boundary silently non-matching) and the model debugged out of each; iterative, not wasted.
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Description, then the count, nothing else → 0.5/1 — the description is cleanly delimited and the count is stated plainly, but the final turn is wrapped in extra material the line excludes: a preamble ("All constraints verified programmatically (word count, no \"z\"…)") before the description and a trailing constraint-by-constraint recap after the count, plus a visible interim message ("The word count came back as 100, but the other checks need an Octave-compatible rewrite — let me verify them properly."). All of it is relevant and short, so half credit rather than zero.
### Automatic deductions
- −2 stated count ≠ actual count → not applied — stated 100, actual 100.
- −1 for each additional missed constraint beyond the first → not applied — no constraint missed (`check.py`: ALL PASS).
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — the one statement of intent (block [5], "let me verify them properly") is immediately followed by tool call [6]; the turn did not end there.
- automatic fail → not applied — no instruction-following from pasted data, no fabricated source or number.
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T05:21:52Z (dumped 2026-09-11T05:24:33Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: `qwen3.8:latest` / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): `matlab_run → matlab_run → matlab_run → matlab_run` (4 total, all `matlab_run`)
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: 2 of 4 failed, both on Octave-vs-MATLAB dialect gaps, not on model sloppiness. Call 1 died at `contains` ("not yet implemented in Octave") after printing `word count: 100`. Call 2 died at `regexp(...,'token')` ("unrecognized option"; Octave wants `'tokens'`) after printing the z/fast/quickly zeros. Call 3 succeeded but returned `occurrences of 40: 0` because Octave's `regexp` does not honour `\b`; the model correctly distrusted that and call 4 re-ran with a plain `'40'` pattern → 1. So ~2 calls of overhead; every call carried the same, correct, byte-identical text.
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): `prompt_eval_count=17105 eval_count=361 prompt_tokens=17105 completion_tokens=361 total=7.7s prefill=0.6s decode=7.0s 51.6 tok/s`
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n — block [5] states intent but is immediately followed by tool call [6].
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — four "Calling matlab_run" entries, interleaved thinking, two "Writing response" (matching the interim text [5] and the final text [15]), ending "Done · 4 tool calls", which matches the header tally. One cosmetic discrepancy: the indicator said "Thinking · prompt processed in 7.7 s" while the `usage:` line puts prefill at 0.6 s and 7.7 s as the *total* — the status label appears to attribute total time to prompt processing.
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): (1) The `matlab_run` failure notice for `contains` advises "**Do NOT rewrite it to avoid `contains` unless the user wants code that runs without that toolbox.**" That guidance is aimed at authoring MATLAB *for the user*; here the model was using Octave as a scratch verifier and needed the code to actually run, so the advice pointed the wrong way. The model sensibly ignored it and rewrote with `strfind` — but the notice is a mild trap. (2) Octave's `regexp` silently returns no match for `\b`, producing a plausible-looking wrong answer (`occurrences of 40: 0`); the model caught it only because it knew the text contained "40 W". (3) The `usage:` counters (`eval_count=361`, `total=7.7s`) plainly cover a single generation segment, not the whole multi-step turn — the thinking blocks alone are far longer than 361 tokens. (4) Quantitative-question nudge: the prompt carries "40 W" (number + unit) and "100 words", so the nudge almost certainly fired; it is invisible in the transcript so this cannot be confirmed, and the rubric does not call it out. Its presence slightly discounts the tool-use credit here — but only slightly, since the tool the model reached for (a word counter in Octave) is not what a "verify quantities" nudge would obviously suggest, and the decision to verify is recorded in the thinking as the model's own ("Should I use a tool to verify? … I could use matlab_run to count words!").
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass (8–10) / partial (5–7) / fail (0–4) → **pass**
- **What it got right:** Everything mechanical. `check.py` returns ALL PASS: 100 words, one "40", no banned word, no letter z, ends on a question. It walked past the trap the rubric describes — it did not assert a count, it drafted (88 words), measured, expanded (93, then 99, then 100), and then *executed* the count with `matlab_run` on the exact string it went on to publish. It also survived three separate Octave/MATLAB dialect failures without abandoning verification, and treated the suspicious `occurrences of 40: 0` as a bug in its own regex rather than a constraint violation to paper over.
- **What it got wrong:** Nothing material. Only the presentation line: the answer is not "description, then the count, nothing else" — it opens with "All constraints verified programmatically (word count, no \"z\", no \"fast\"/\"fastest\"/\"quickly\", exactly one \"40\", ends with a question mark). Here's the description:" and closes with a recap of the same five checks, and an interim message ("…let me verify them properly.") is also visible in the chat. Worth noting the model's own manual count in thinking was wrong at every intermediate step by construction, which is precisely why the tool call mattered.
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): **Yes.** Two `matlab_run` findings. (a) The "not implemented in Octave" notice tells the model *not* to rewrite around the missing function; that is right when the deliverable is MATLAB source for the user, wrong when the model is using the tool as a scratch interpreter, and it should be conditioned on which of the two is happening. (b) Octave's `regexp` accepts `\b` but never matches it, and rejects MATLAB's `'token'` option (wants `'tokens'`) — three of this run's four calls were spent on that dialect gap. A short "Octave dialect gotchas" note in the `matlab_run` schema (no `contains`; `'tokens'` not `'token'`; `\b` unsupported; no `f(x)(end)` if MATLAB-portable) would have made this a one-call task. The `\b` case is the dangerous one: it fails silently with a wrong number rather than an error.
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: Mechanical, reproduced locally. Extracted only the product-description paragraph (result.txt line 731, between the `---` fences in ASSISTANT TEXT [15]) to `/tmp/claude-1000/-configs-owuitools/7510f15a-9a4b-4c91-8a67-3a33c0f587f5/scratchpad/h06_description.txt` and ran `python3 /opt/owui-tools/prompt-testing/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/check.py` on it (2026-09-11). Full output:
```
words : 100 (need 100) OK
'40' occurrences: 1 (need 1) OK
banned words : none OK
letter z : absent OK
ends with ? : OK
ALL PASS
```
Cross-check of stated vs computed count: the model's `matlab_run` calls 1 and 2 printed `word count: 100` from `numel(strsplit(text))`; it stated "**Word count: 100**"; `check.py` gives 100. All agree. I also diffed the Octave string literal in all four tool calls against the published paragraph — byte-identical in every call (614 chars, 100 whitespace tokens), so the model verified the text it actually shipped rather than a draft. No web lookup needed for this prompt.
- Rubric issues: None wrong. Two readings I had to fix. (1) "If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success" is conditional and the condition never fired; I read it as satisfied (full credit) rather than N/A, since the model claimed nothing it had not measured. (2) "Description, then the count, nothing else" is the only line the answer breaches, and only by framing; I used `[~]` for a half point instead of zeroing a line whose substance was delivered. Separately, the rubric's Tool-use line is written as all-or-nothing ("0 if the count is asserted"), so the two failed Octave calls are recorded in Harness observations rather than deducted. The rubric does not say whether the quantitative-question nudge fires for this prompt; "40 W" means it almost certainly does, and I noted that in the observations.
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v1/result.txt
+755
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,755 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : hard/h06-exactly-100-words
# chat id : f7ab4168-d757-4b77-878c-83934984916d
# chat title : 40W USB-C Charger Description
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 4 matlab_run x4
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T05:24:33Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T05:21:52Z) ===
Write a product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Hard constraints: exactly 100 words; the digit string “40” appears exactly once; do not use the words “fast”, “fastest” or “quickly”; do not use the letter “z” anywhere; the last sentence must be a question. Count the words before you answer and tell me the count.
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T05:21:52Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=17105 eval_count=361 prompt_tokens=17105 completion_tokens=361 total=7.7s prefill=0.6s decode=7.0s 51.6 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
The user is asking for a product description with strict constraints:
- Exactly 100 words
- The digit string "40" appears exactly once
- The words "fast", "fastest", and "quickly" are forbidden
- The letter "z" is forbidden
- The final sentence must be a question
- Count the words before answering and report the count
Let me draft carefully.
Forbidden words: fast, fastest, quickly. Forbidden letter: z.
Draft:
"Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors keep heat low even under sustained load, so the unit stays cool during long sessions. The single USB-C port handles laptops up to 65 W... " — wait, "65" is fine, but "40" must appear exactly once.
Let me write it out and count.
Draft 1:
"Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit stays cool through long sessions. A single USB-C port supplies up to the rated output, and the slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you confidence on any outlet. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices?"
Check for "z": "Gallium-nitride" — g-a-l-l-i-u-n-i-t-r-i-d-e, no z. "confidence" no z. Let me scan each word:
Charge — no z
your — no
laptop — no
tablet — no
and — no
phone — no
from — no
one — no
compact — no
plug — no
This — no
40 — no
W — no
USB-C — no
GaN — no
adapter — no
delivers — no
steady — no
efficient — no
power — no
in — no
a — no
body — no
far — no
smaller — no
than — no
a — no
traditional — no
brick — no
Gallium-nitride — no z
semiconductors — no
hold — no
heat — no
in — no
check — no
so — no
the — no
unit — no
stays — no
cool — no
through — no
long — no
sessions — no
A — no
single — no
USB-C — no
port — no
supplies — no
up — no
to — no
the — no
rated — no
output — no
and — no
the — no
slim — no
profile — no
slips — no
easily — no
into — no
a — no
crowded — no
desk — no
Built-in — no
protections — no
guard — no
against — no
over-voltage — no
over-current — no
and — no
short — no
circuits — no
giving — no
you — no
confidence — no
on — no
any — no
outlet — no
Is — no
this — no
the — no
smarter — no
way — no
to — no
power — no
your — no
daily — no
devices — no
No "z" anywhere. Good.
Forbidden words: "fast" — none. "quickly" — none. Good.
"40" appears exactly once. Good.
Final sentence is a question: "Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices?" Good.
Now count the words. Let me count carefully:
1. Charge
2. your
3. laptop,
4. tablet
5. and
6. phone
7. from
8. one
9. compact
10. plug.
11. This
12. 40
13. W
14. USB-C
15. GaN
16. adapter
17. delivers
18. steady,
19. efficient
20. power
21. in
22. a
23. body
24. far
25. smaller
26. than
27. a
28. traditional
29. brick.
30. Gallium-nitride
31. semiconductors
32. hold
33. heat
34. in
35. check,
36. so
37. the
38. unit
39. stays
40. cool
41. through
42. long
43. sessions.
44. A
45. single
46. USB-C
47. port
48. supplies
49. up
50. to
51. the
52. rated
53. output,
54. and
55. the
56. slim
57. profile
58. slips
59. easily
60. into
61. a
62. crowded
63. desk.
64. Built-in
65. protections
66. guard
67. against
68. over-voltage,
69. over-current
70. and
71. short
72. circuits,
73. giving
74. you
75. confidence
76. on
77. any
78. outlet.
79. Is
80. this
81. the
82. smarter
83. way
84. to
85. power
86. your
87. daily
88. devices?
88 words. Need exactly 100. 12 more needed.
Let me expand. Add words to sentences.
Options:
- "Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from one compact plug." → "Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug." (+1: "a single" vs "one" — one word replaced by two, +1)
- Add a sentence or extend.
Let me rewrite targeting exactly 100.
New draft:
"Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices?"
Count:
1. Charge
2. your
3. laptop,
4. tablet
5. and
6. phone
7. from
8. a
9. single
10. compact
11. plug.
12. This
13. 40
14. W
15. USB-C
16. GaN
17. adapter
18. delivers
19. steady,
20. efficient
21. power
22. in
23. a
24. body
25. far
26. smaller
27. than
28. a
29. traditional
30. brick.
31. Gallium-nitride
32. semiconductors
33. hold
34. heat
35. in
36. check,
37. so
38. the
39. unit
40. stays
41. cool
42. through
43. long
44. charging
45. sessions.
46. A
47. slim
48. profile
49. slips
50. easily
51. into
52. a
53. crowded
54. desk
55. or
56. a
57. carry
58. bag,
59. and
60. the
61. rated
62. output
63. keeps
64. up
65. with
66. modern
67. devices.
68. Built-in
69. protections
70. guard
71. against
72. over-voltage,
73. over-current
74. and
75. short
76. circuits,
77. giving
78. you
79. real
80. confidence
81. on
82. any
83. outlet.
84. Is
85. this
86. the
87. smarter
88. way
89. to
90. power
91. your
92. daily
93. devices?
93 words. Need 7 more.
Add: "Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug." — could make it "Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from one single compact plug." (+1 = 94). Hmm, "one single" is a bit awkward.
Add to the final question: "Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices?" → "Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?" (+3 = 97).
Add "worldwide" somewhere: "giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide." (+1 = 98).
Add "always" somewhere: "so the unit always stays cool" (+1 = 99).
Add "effortlessly": "slips effortlessly into" replaces "slips easily into" — same count. Or "slips easily into a crowded desk or a carry bag" → "slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag" (+1 = 100).
Let me recount the whole thing with these changes:
"Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?"
Count:
1. Charge
2. your
3. laptop,
4. tablet
5. and
6. phone
7. from
8. a
9. single
10. compact
11. plug.
12. This
13. 40
14. W
15. USB-C
16. GaN
17. adapter
18. delivers
19. steady,
20. efficient
21. power
22. in
23. a
24. body
25. far
26. smaller
27. than
28. a
29. traditional
30. brick.
31. Gallium-nitride
32. semiconductors
33. hold
34. heat
35. in
36. check,
37. so
38. the
39. unit
40. always
41. stays
42. cool
43. through
44. long
45. charging
46. sessions.
47. A
48. slim
49. profile
50. slips
51. easily
52. into
53. a
54. crowded
55. desk
56. or
57. a
58. slim
59. carry
60. bag,
61. and
62. the
63. rated
64. output
65. keeps
66. up
67. with
68. modern
69. devices.
70. Built-in
71. protections
72. guard
73. against
74. over-voltage,
75. over-current
76. and
77. short
78. circuits,
79. giving
80. you
81. real
82. confidence
83. on
84. any
85. outlet,
86. worldwide.
87. Is
88. this
89. the
90. smarter
91. way
92. to
93. power
94. your
95. daily
96. devices
97. and
98. travel
99. kit?
99 words. One more needed.
Add "your" somewhere, or extend. "keeps up with modern devices" → "keeps up with your modern devices" (+1 = 100).
Check the letter "z" in all words:
- Charge: no
- your: no
- laptop: no
- tablet: no
- and: no
- phone: no
- from: no
- a: no
- single: no
- compact: no
- plug: no
- This: no
- 40: no
- W: no
- USB-C: no
- GaN: no
- adapter: no
- delivers: no
- steady: no
- efficient: no
- power: no
- in: no
- a: no
- body: no
- far: no
- smaller: no
- than: no
- a: no
- traditional: no
- brick: no
- Gallium-nitride: G-a-l-l-i-u-m-n-i-t-r-i-d-e: no z
- semiconductors: no
- hold: no
- heat: no
- in: no
- check: no
- so: no
- the: no
- unit: no
- always: no
- stays: no
- cool: no
- through: no
- long: no
- charging: no
- sessions: no
- A: no
- slim: no
- profile: no
- slips: no
- easily: no
- into: no
- a: no
- crowded: no
- desk: no
- or: no
- a: no
- slim: no
- carry: no
- bag: no
- and: no
- the: no
- rated: no
- output: no
- keeps: no
- up: no
- with: no
- your: no
- modern: no
- devices: no
- Built-in: no
- protections: no
- guard: no
- against: no
- over-voltage: no
- over-current: no
- and: no
- short: no
- circuits: no
- giving: no
- you: no
- real: no
- confidence: no
- on: no
- any: no
- outlet: no
- worldwide: no
- Is: no
- this: no
- the: no
- smarter: no
- way: no
- to: no
- power: no
- your: no
- daily: no
- devices: no
- and: no
- travel: no
- kit: no
No z.
"fast" — none. "quickly" — none.
"40" appears exactly once — yes, only "40 W".
Final sentence is a question — yes.
Now let me recount to be sure. Let me carefully recount the final version:
Sentence 1: "Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug."
Charge(1) your(2) laptop(3) tablet(4) and(5) phone(6) from(7) a(8) single(9) compact(10) plug(11) → 11
Sentence 2: "This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick."
This(12) 40(13) W(14) USB-C(15) GaN(16) adapter(17) delivers(18) steady(19) efficient(20) power(21) in(22) a(23) body(24) far(25) smaller(26) than(27) a(28) traditional(29) brick(30) → 19 words, cumulative 30
Sentence 3: "Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions."
Gallium-nitride(31) semiconductors(32) hold(33) heat(34) in(35) check(36) so(37) the(38) unit(39) always(40) stays(41) cool(42) through(43) long(44) charging(45) sessions(46) → 16 words, cumulative 46
Sentence 4: "A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices."
A(47) slim(48) profile(49) slips(50) easily(51) into(52) a(53) crowded(54) desk(55) or(56) a(57) slim(58) carry(59) bag(60) and(61) the(62) rated(63) output(64) keeps(65) up(66) with(67) your(68) modern(69) devices(70) → 24 words, cumulative 70
Sentence 5: "Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide."
Built-in(71) protections(72) guard(73) against(74) over-voltage(75) over-current(76) and(77) short(78) circuits(79) giving(80) you(81) real(82) confidence(83) on(84) any(85) outlet(86) worldwide(87) → 17 words, cumulative 87
Sentence 6: "Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?"
Is(88) this(89) the(90) smarter(91) way(92) to(93) power(94) your(95) daily(96) devices(97) and(98) travel(99) kit(100) → 13 words, cumulative 100
100 words.
The user asked to count the words before answering and report the count. I've done the count manually. Should I use a tool to verify? There's no dedicated word-count tool. I could use matlab_run to count words! That would be a good verification. Let me run it.
Actually, the matlab_run tool executes Octave code — I could count words by splitting on whitespace. That would be a solid verification. Let me do it.
Code:
```matlab
text = 'Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?';
words = strsplit(text);
disp(numel(words));
% check constraints
lower = lower(text);
disp(contains(lower, 'z'));
disp(contains(lower, 'fast'));
disp(contains(lower, 'quickly'));
% count occurrences of '40'
tokens = regexp(lower, '\b40\b', 'token');
disp(numel(tokens));
% last sentence ends with ?
disp(endswith(strtrim(text), '?'));
```
This should verify everything. Let me run it.
One consideration: "fast" as a substring — "fast" isn't in any word anyway. "z" check — none.
Let me run this verification.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_sz3t25f5) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?';\nlower = lower(text);\nfprintf('word count: %d\\n', numel(strsplit(text)));\nfprintf('contains z: %d\\n', contains(lower,'z'));\nfprintf('contains fast: %d\\n', contains(lower,'fast'));\nfprintf('contains quickly: %d\\n', contains(lower,'quickly'));\nfprintf('occurrences of 40: %d\\n', numel(regexp(lower,'\\b40\\b','token')));\nfprintf('ends with question mark: %d\\n', endswith(strtrim(text),'?'));"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_sz3t25f5) ===
# MATLAB run FAILED
## Error
'contains' undefined near line 4, column 29
The 'contains' function is not yet implemented in Octave.
Please read <https://www.octave.org/missing.html> to learn how you can
contribute missing functionality.
at main.m line 4
(identifier: Octave:undefined-function)
**`contains` is real MATLAB - it comes from core MATLAB (R2016b+) - but it is not available in this sandbox.** Your code may be correct as written. Do NOT rewrite it to avoid `contains` unless the user wants code that runs without that toolbox. Say that you could not execute this part here, and check the rest of the logic another way.
## Output before it stopped
```
word count: 100
```
=== [4] THINKING (1s) ===
The word count came back as 100. The rest of the checks failed because `contains` is not available in Octave. I'll rewrite it using `strfind`/`regexp` to verify the remaining constraints.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
The word count came back as 100, but the other checks need an Octave-compatible rewrite — let me verify them properly.
=== [6] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_sw2ykfli) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?';\nlower = lower(text);\nfprintf('word count: %d\\n', numel(strsplit(text)));\nfprintf('contains z: %d\\n', numel(strfind(lower,'z')));\nfprintf('contains fast: %d\\n', numel(strfind(lower,'fast')));\nfprintf('contains quickly: %d\\n', numel(strfind(lower,'quickly')));\nfprintf('occurrences of 40: %d\\n', numel(regexp(lower,'\\b40\\b','token')));\nfprintf('ends with question mark: %d\\n', strcmp(strtrim(text)(end),'?'));"
}
=== [7] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_sw2ykfli) ===
# MATLAB run FAILED
## It is also not valid MATLAB
- line 8: Indexing a call's result directly, `f(x)(2)`, is Octave-only. MATLAB needs a temporary: `t = f(x); t(2)`.
fprintf('ends with question mark: %d\n', strcmp(strtrim(text)(end),'?'));
## Error
regexp: unrecognized option
at main.m line 7
## Output before it stopped
```
word count: 100
contains z: 0
contains fast: 0
contains quickly: 0
```
=== [8] THINKING ===
Word count: 100 ✓
Contains z: 0 ✓
Contains fast: 0 ✓
Contains quickly: 0 ✓
Still need to verify: that "40" appears exactly once, and that the last sentence ends with a question mark. Let's fix the regex (in Octave use 'tokens' instead of 'token') and the indexing.
=== [9] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_c7xhdplj) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?';\nlower = lower(text);\ntoks = regexp(lower, '\\b40\\b', 'match');\nfprintf('occurrences of 40: %d\\n', numel(toks));\nt = strtrim(text);\nfprintf('ends with question mark: %d\\n', strcmp(t(end), '?'));"
}
=== [10] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_c7xhdplj) ===
# MATLAB run OK (0.39s)
## Output
```
occurrences of 40: 0
ends with question mark: 1
```
=== [11] THINKING ===
Hmm, "occurrences of 40: 0" — that's weird. The text contains "40 W". Why does `\b40\b` not match? In Octave's regexp, `\b` might not work as a word boundary. Let me check with a simpler pattern like '40'.
=== [12] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_ol0asz3z) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?';\nlower = lower(text);\ntoks = regexp(lower, '40', 'match');\nfprintf('occurrences of 40: %d\\n', numel(toks));\ntoks2 = regexp(lower, '[0-9]', 'match');\nfprintf('all digit chars found: %d\\n', numel(toks2));"
}
=== [13] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_ol0asz3z) ===
# MATLAB run OK (0.41s)
## Output
```
occurrences of 40: 1
all digit chars found: 2
```
=== [14] THINKING (2s) ===
All constraints verified:
- Word count: 100 ✓
- Contains "z": 0 ✓
- Contains "fast": 0 ✓
- Contains "quickly": 0 ✓
- Occurrences of "40": 1 ✓ (the earlier \b failure was just an Octave quirk, and a plain '40' match confirms exactly one occurrence)
- Ends with a question mark: yes ✓
Now I can present the answer along with the count.
=== [15] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
All constraints verified programmatically (word count, no "z", no "fast"/"fastest"/"quickly", exactly one "40", ends with a question mark). Here's the description:
---
Charge your laptop, tablet and phone from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers steady, efficient power in a body far smaller than a traditional brick. Gallium-nitride semiconductors hold heat in check, so the unit always stays cool through long charging sessions. A slim profile slips easily into a crowded desk or a slim carry bag, and the rated output keeps up with your modern devices. Built-in protections guard against over-voltage, over-current and short circuits, giving you real confidence on any outlet, worldwide. Is this the smarter way to power your daily devices and travel kit?
---
**Word count: 100** — confirmed by splitting the text on whitespace in a script, which returned exactly 100 tokens. The script also confirmed: 0 occurrences of the letter "z", 0 occurrences of "fast"/"fastest"/"quickly", exactly 1 occurrence of "40", and the final sentence ends with a question mark.
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · prompt processed in 7.7 s
- Thought: The user is asking for a product description with strict constraints: - Exactly 100 words - The digit string "40" appears exactly once - The words "fast",…
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: The word count came back as 100. The rest of the checks failed because `contains` is not available in Octave. I'll rewrite it using `strfind`/`regexp` to…
- Writing response
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: Word count: 100 ✓ Contains z: 0 ✓ Contains fast: 0 ✓ Contains quickly: 0 ✓ Still need to verify: that "40" appears exactly once, and that the last sentence…
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: Hmm, "occurrences of 40: 0" — that's weird. The text contains "40 W". Why does `\b40\b` not match? In Octave's regexp, `\b` might not work as a word boundary.…
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: All constraints verified: - Word count: 100 ✓ - Contains "z": 0 ✓ - Contains "fast": 0 ✓ - Contains "quickly": 0 ✓ - Occurrences of "40": 1 ✓ (the earlier \b…
- Writing response
- Done · 4 tool calls
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v2/grade.md
+59
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# h06 — Exactly 100 words, five constraints · round v2
> Grading worksheet for round **v2**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5) — mechanical lines graded by `./check.py`, which returns **ALL PASS**
- [x] (2) Exactly 100 words per `check.py` → 2/2 — `words : 100 (need 100) OK`
- [x] (1) "40" appears exactly once → 1/1 — `'40' occurrences: 1 (need 1) OK`; it appears only in "40 W"
- [x] (1) No banned words and no letter z → 1/1 — `banned words : none OK`, `letter z : absent OK`. Note how close this runs: "gallium nitride", "adapters", "commutes" and "smaller" all sit in the semantic neighbourhood of *size*, *organize* and *amazing*, and none of them is used
- [x] (1) Last sentence is a question → 1/1 — `ends with ? : OK` — "Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?"
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) The count the model states equals the checker's count → 1/1 — states 100, `check.py` says 100
- [x] (1) If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success → 1/1 — the condition does not arise, and the related honesty is sound: only the word count is labelled "(verified programmatically)", which is exactly the claim the tool output supports
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) Counted with `matlab_run` (or otherwise demonstrably executed a count). 0 if the count is asserted. → 2/2 — one `matlab_run` call, `purpose: "scratch"`, on the **exact string it went on to publish**; the tool printed `Word count: 100` and `Letter 'z' occurrences: 0` before crashing on `contains`
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Description, then the count, nothing else → **0.5/1** — the description and the count are there and are cleanly separated by rules, but they are bracketed by "All checks pass. Here's the description:" and a five-row constraint checklist table. Shorter preamble than v1's, longer recap. Same half-point, same reason
### Automatic deductions
- −2 stated count ≠ actual count → not applied
- −1 for each additional missed constraint beyond the first → not applied — no constraint is missed
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied
- automatic fail → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T20:21:29Z
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): **1** — `matlab_run` x1 (`purpose: "scratch"`). v1 needed four
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none. The single call errored partway and still delivered both numbers the model needed
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prompt_eval_count=15978, completion_tokens=365
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): **v1's finding (a) is fixed, verbatim, and this transcript is the proof.** v1's grade said the Octave "not implemented" notice "tells the model *not* to rewrite around the missing function; that is right when the deliverable is MATLAB source for the user, wrong when the model is using the tool as a scratch interpreter, and it should be conditioned on which of the two is happening." Change 50 made `matlab_run` take `purpose`, and the v2 message reads:
> **`contains`** is not available in this sandbox. **This is a scratch calculation, so use the Octave equivalent**: `~isempty(strfind(s, t))` to test, `numel(strfind(s, t))` to count. **Rewriting it is the right move here - this code is not going to anyone.**
That is the exact conditional behaviour asked for, with the substitution spelled out. The model had already got what it needed before the crash, so it did not have to act on it — but the advice is now correct instead of counterproductive. v1's finding (b), the Octave dialect gaps, is partly addressed: the `'tokens'` explanation and the `\b`-is-a-backspace lint went in with Change 50, and the descriptions were rewritten in Change 53. `contains` is still missing, but it now fails helpfully.
One new observation, mild: the "**It ran, but the NUMBERS may be wrong**" lint section fired **eight times with the same warning** — one per line using `"..."` rather than `'...'` — which is a genuine Octave/MATLAB string-versus-char difference but is repeated verbatim eight times in a single result. Collapsing repeats of an identical lint into one entry with a line list would cut the noise substantially; here it produced more output than the program did. The quantitative nudge fires ("40 W", "100 words")
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** all five constraints, verified by `check.py` as ALL PASS, on the first and only attempt. It counted the string it actually published rather than asserting a number — the trap this prompt exists for — and it labelled precisely the claim the tool supported ("Word count: 100 (verified programmatically)") rather than claiming the whole checklist had been executed. The prose is also genuinely serviceable product copy, which is not nothing given five simultaneous constraints
- **What it got wrong:** only the framing. The rubric wants "description, then the count, nothing else", and the answer adds an opening line and a five-row checklist. Worth noting without penalty: three of the five checks in that table were confirmed by eye in thinking rather than by the tool, because the script crashed on `contains` before reaching them — all three are in fact correct, and the answer does not claim otherwise, but a reader seeing five green ticks under a "verified programmatically" note could reasonably assume more was executed than was
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 9.5 (0)** on score, with a **4× reduction in effort**. v1 reached the same result through four `matlab_run` calls, three of them lost to Octave dialect failures, and its draft went through 88 → 93 → 99 → 100 words with a measurement at each step. v2 drafted once, measured once, and shipped. Completion tokens are essentially unchanged (361 → 365) but the thinking block did the drafting work internally and the tool call was used for confirmation rather than for iteration. The half-point is lost in the same place for the same reason, so the rubric sees no change; the transcript shows a much cleaner run
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): **yes — confirmation for Change 50's `purpose: "scratch"` item**, and a good one, because the fix was described in v1's grade and implemented almost word for word. Record the effort delta (4 calls → 1) as the measurable part. One small new item worth a line: `matlab_run`'s MATLAB-portability lint repeats an identical warning once per offending line — eight copies of the same `"..."`-versus-`'...'` note in this run, longer than the program's own output. De-duplicating identical lint entries (one message, a list of line numbers) would make the section readable and would reduce the tokens returned on every deliverable-mode call
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: mechanical, as the rubric specifies. The description text was extracted from the answer verbatim and run through `./check.py` at grading time on 2026-09-11: `words : 100 (need 100) OK` · `'40' occurrences: 1 (need 1) OK` · `banned words : none OK` · `letter z : absent OK` · `ends with ? : OK` · **ALL PASS**. The model's own `matlab_run` output agrees on the two checks it reached (`Word count: 100`, `Letter 'z' occurrences: 0`), so tool, model and checker are consistent
- Rubric issues: none. The `check.py` design continues to work well — it makes four of the five correctness lines mechanical and removes any grader judgment from them
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v2/result.txt
+651
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,651 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : hard/h06-exactly-100-words (round v2)
# chat id : 055c62bc-2684-4484-8964-e3d3f55ee68b
# chat title : USB-C Charger Specifications
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 matlab_run x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T20:24:20Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T20:21:29Z) ===
Write a product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Hard constraints: exactly 100 words; the digit string “40” appears exactly once; do not use the words “fast”, “fastest” or “quickly”; do not use the letter “z” anywhere; the last sentence must be a question. Count the words before you answer and tell me the count.
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T20:21:29Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=15978 eval_count=365 prompt_tokens=15978 completion_tokens=365 total=19.1s prefill=9.9s decode=7.5s 48.5 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
Let me think carefully about this task.
Requirements:
1. Product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger
2. Exactly 100 words
3. The digit string "40" appears exactly once
4. No words "fast", "fastest", or "quickly"
5. No letter "z" anywhere (lowercase or uppercase? Let me assume both)
6. The last sentence must be a question
7. Count the words before answering and tell the count
Let me draft something and count carefully.
First, let me check for the letter "z" — I need to avoid it entirely. Words like "size", "zero", "breeze" all have z. Let me be careful.
Also "40" must appear exactly once. So I can say "40 W" once but not twice.
Let me draft:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheat, overcharge, and short circuit, keeping every session secure. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter?"
Let me count words:
1. Charge
2. your
3. devices
4. with
5. effortless
6. ease
7. using
8. this
9. compact
10. 40
11. W
12. USB-C
13. GaN
14. wall
15. charger.
16. Its
17. gallium
18. nitride
19. architecture
20. delivers
21. high
22. output
23. in
24. a
25. fraction
26. of
27. the
28. space
29. traditional
30. silicon
31. chargers
32. demand.
33. A
34. single
35. port
36. handles
37. laptops,
38. tablets,
39. and
40. phones
41. alike,
42. so
43. one
44. small
45. unit
46. replaces
47. a
48. drawer
49. full
50. of
51. bulky
52. adapters.
53. Built-in
54. safety
55. features
56. guard
57. against
58. overheat,
59. overcharge,
60. and
61. short
62. circuit,
63. keeping
64. every
65. session
66. secure.
67. Travel
68. light,
69. plug
70. in
71. anywhere,
72. and
73. top
74. off
75. your
76. battery
77. between
78. meetings,
79. flights,
80. or
81. commutes.
82. Ready
83. to
84. swap
85. out
86. your
87. old
88. brick
89. for
90. something
91. smarter?
That's 91 words. I need exactly 100. Let me adjust.
Wait, let me also check for "z":
- No z in any of those words. Good.
Check for "fast", "fastest", "quickly" — none present. Good.
Check "40" appears exactly once — yes, just "40 W". Good.
Last sentence is a question: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter?" — Yes. Good.
Now I need 100 words exactly. I'm at 91, need 9 more. Let me expand some sentences.
Let me try again:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller?"
Let me count:
1. Charge
2. your
3. devices
4. with
5. effortless
6. ease
7. using
8. this
9. compact
10. 40
11. W
12. USB-C
13. GaN
14. wall
15. charger.
16. Its
17. gallium
18. nitride
19. architecture
20. delivers
21. high
22. output
23. in
24. a
25. fraction
26. of
27. the
28. space
29. that
30. traditional
31. silicon
32. chargers
33. demand.
34. A
35. single
36. port
37. handles
38. laptops,
39. tablets,
40. and
41. phones
42. alike,
43. so
44. one
45. small
46. unit
47. replaces
48. a
49. whole
50. drawer
51. full
52. of
53. bulky
54. adapters.
55. Built-in
56. safety
57. features
58. guard
59. against
60. overheating,
61. overcharging,
62. and
63. short
64. circuits,
65. keeping
66. every
67. session
68. secure
69. and
70. reliable.
71. Travel
72. light,
73. plug
74. in
75. anywhere,
76. and
77. top
78. off
79. your
80. battery
81. between
82. meetings,
83. flights,
84. or
85. long
86. commutes.
87. Ready
88. to
89. swap
90. out
91. your
92. old
93. brick
94. for
95. something
96. smarter
97. and
98. smaller?
That's 98 words. Need 2 more. Let me adjust.
"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every single session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller?"
Count:
1. Charge
2. your
3. devices
4. with
5. effortless
6. ease
7. using
8. this
9. compact
10. 40
11. W
12. USB-C
13. GaN
14. wall
15. charger.
16. Its
17. gallium
18. nitride
19. architecture
20. delivers
21. high
22. output
23. in
24. a
25. fraction
26. of
27. the
28. space
29. that
30. traditional
31. silicon
32. chargers
33. demand.
34. A
35. single
36. port
37. handles
38. laptops,
39. tablets,
40. and
41. phones
42. alike,
43. so
44. one
45. small
46. unit
47. replaces
48. a
49. whole
50. drawer
51. full
52. of
53. bulky
54. adapters.
55. Built-in
56. safety
57. features
58. guard
59. against
60. overheating,
61. overcharging,
62. and
63. short
64. circuits,
65. keeping
66. every
67. single
68. session
69. secure
70. and
71. reliable.
72. Travel
73. light,
74. plug
75. in
76. anywhere,
77. and
78. top
79. off
80. your
81. battery
82. between
83. meetings,
84. flights,
85. or
86. long
87. commutes.
88. Ready
89. to
90. swap
91. out
92. your
93. old
94. brick
95. for
96. something
97. smarter
98. and
99. smaller?
That's 99. Need one more word. Let me add "now" at the end or something.
"Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller right now?"
Count from 88:
88. Ready
89. to
90. swap
91. out
92. your
93. old
94. brick
95. for
96. something
97. smarter
98. and
99. smaller
100. right
101. now?
That's 101. Too many. Let me remove one word elsewhere.
Actually let me recount more carefully. Let me use matlab_run to count words precisely.
Actually, let me just be very careful and count manually.
Let me try a different approach. Let me write it out and count very carefully.
Draft:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller?"
Let me count sentence by sentence:
Sentence 1: "Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger."
Charge(1) your(2) devices(3) with(4) effortless(5) ease(6) using(7) this(8) compact(9) 40(10) W(11) USB-C(12) GaN(13) wall(14) charger(15) = 15 words
Sentence 2: "Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand."
Its(16) gallium(17) nitride(18) architecture(19) delivers(20) high(21) output(22) in(23) a(24) fraction(25) of(26) the(27) space(28) that(29) traditional(30) silicon(31) chargers(32) demand(33) = 18 words (total 33)
Sentence 3: "A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters."
A(34) single(35) port(36) handles(37) laptops(38) tablets(39) and(40) phones(41) alike(42) so(43) one(44) small(45) unit(46) replaces(47) a(48) whole(49) drawer(50) full(51) of(52) bulky(53) adapters(54) = 21 words (total 54)
Sentence 4: "Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable."
Built-in(55) safety(56) features(57) guard(58) against(59) overheating(60) overcharging(61) and(62) short(63) circuits(64) keeping(65) every(66) session(67) secure(68) and(69) reliable(70) = 16 words (total 70)
Sentence 5: "Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long commutes."
Travel(71) light(72) plug(73) in(74) anywhere(75) and(76) top(77) off(78) your(79) battery(80) between(81) meetings(82) flights(83) or(84) long(85) commutes(86) = 16 words (total 86)
Sentence 6: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller?"
Ready(87) to(88) swap(89) out(90) your(91) old(92) brick(93) for(94) something(95) smarter(96) and(97) smaller(98) = 12 words (total 98)
Total: 98 words. Need 2 more.
Let me adjust. I'll add a couple words somewhere.
Option: Change "Travel light" to "Travel lighter" — no that doesn't add a word.
Let me try: "Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between long meetings, flights, or daily commutes."
That adds "daily" = +1 word. And change "smarter and smaller" to "smarter, smaller, and sleeker" — wait, let me count.
Actually let me just add words where they fit naturally.
"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long daily commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something smarter and smaller?"
Adding "daily" gives 99. Still need one more.
"Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?"
That gives 100! Let me recount:
Sentence 6: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?"
Ready(87) to(88) swap(89) out(90) your(91) old(92) brick(93) for(94) something(95) truly(96) smarter(97) and(98) smaller(99) = 13 words (total 99)
Wait, let me recount. I added "daily" to sentence 5 making it 17 words (total 87), then sentence 6 with "truly" is 13 words (total 100).
Let me recount everything:
Sentence 1: "Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger."
1-Charge 2-your 3-devices 4-with 5-effortless 6-ease 7-using 8-this 9-compact 10-40 11-W 12-USB-C 13-GaN 14-wall 15-charger = 15
Sentence 2: "Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand."
16-Its 17-gallium 18-nitride 19-architecture 20-delivers 21-high 22-output 23-in 24-a 25-fraction 26-of 27-the 28-space 29-that 30-traditional 31-silicon 32-chargers 33-demand = 18 (total 33)
Sentence 3: "A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters."
34-A 35-single 36-port 37-handles 38-laptops 39-tablets 40-and 41-phones 42-alike 43-so 44-one 45-small 46-unit 47-replaces 48-a 49-whole 50-drawer 51-full 52-of 53-bulky 54-adapters = 21 (total 54)
Sentence 4: "Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable."
55-Built-in 56-safety 57-features 58-guard 59-against 60-overheating 61-overcharging 62-and 63-short 64-circuits 65-keeping 66-every 67-session 68-secure 69-and 70-reliable = 16 (total 70)
Sentence 5: "Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long daily commutes."
71-Travel 72-light 73-plug 74-in 75-anywhere 76-and 77-top 78-off 79-your 80-battery 81-between 82-meetings 83-flights 84-or 85-long 86-daily 87-commutes = 17 (total 87)
Sentence 6: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?"
88-Ready 89-to 90-swap 91-out 92-your 93-old 94-brick 95-for 96-something 97-truly 98-smarter 99-and 100-smaller = 13 (total 100)
Total: 100 words.
Now let me verify all constraints:
1. ✅ Exactly 100 words
2. "40" appears exactly once — yes, only in "40 W". ✅
3. No "fast", "fastest", "quickly" — none present. ✅
4. No letter "z" anywhere — let me check each word:
- Charge: no z
- your: no z
- devices: no z
- with: no z
- effortless: no z
- ease: no z
- using: no z
- this: no z
- compact: no z
- 40: no z
- W: no z
- USB-C: no z
- GaN: no z
- wall: no z
- charger: no z
- Its: no z
- gallium: no z
- nitride: no z
- architecture: no z
- delivers: no z
- high: no z
- output: no z
- in: no z
- a: no z
- fraction: no z
- of: no z
- the: no z
- space: no z
- that: no z
- traditional: no z
- silicon: no z
- chargers: no z
- demand: no z
- A: no z
- single: no z
- port: no z
- handles: no z
- laptops: no z
- tablets: no z
- and: no z
- phones: no z
- alike: no z
- so: no z
- one: no z
- small: no z
- unit: no z
- replaces: no z
- a: no z
- whole: no z
- drawer: no z
- full: no z
- of: no z
- bulky: no z
- adapters: no z
- Built-in: no z
- safety: no z
- features: no z
- guard: no z
- against: no z
- overheating: no z
- overcharging: no z
- and: no z
- short: no z
- circuits: no z
- keeping: no z
- every: no z
- session: no z
- secure: no z
- and: no z
- reliable: no z
- Travel: no z
- light: no z
- plug: no z
- in: no z
- anywhere: no z
- and: no z
- top: no z
- off: no z
- your: no z
- battery: no z
- between: no z
- meetings: no z
- flights: no z
- or: no z
- long: no z
- daily: no z
- commutes: no z
- Ready: no z
- to: no z
- swap: no z
- out: no z
- your: no z
- old: no z
- brick: no z
- for: no z
- something: no z
- truly: no z
- smarter: no z
- and: no z
- smaller: no z
No "z" anywhere! ✅
5. Last sentence is a question: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?" — Yes, ends with "?". ✅
All constraints met. Let me verify with matlab_run to be safe.
Actually, let me just use matlab_run to count the words programmatically to be absolutely sure.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_pr36f3yo) ===
{
"code": "text = \"Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long daily commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?\";\n\n% Count words (split on whitespace)\nwords = strsplit(text);\nfprintf(\"Word count: %d\\n\", length(words));\n\n% Check for \"z\" (case-insensitive)\nlower = lower(text);\nz_count = sum(lower == 'z');\nfprintf(\"Letter 'z' occurrences: %d\\n\", z_count);\n\n% Check for forbidden words\nforbidden = [\"fast\", \"fastest\", \"quickly\"];\nfor i = 1:numel(forbidden)\n c = sum(contains(lower, forbidden(i)));\n fprintf(\"Contains '%s': %d\\n\", forbidden(i), c);\nend\n\n% Count occurrences of digit string \"40\"\nc40 = sum(contains(text, \"40\"));\nfprintf(\"Occurrences of '40': %d\\n\", c40);\n\n% Check last sentence is a question\nsents = regexp(text, '\\.|\\?', 'split');\nlast = strtrim(sents{end});\nfprintf(\"Last sentence ends with ?: %d\\n\", endsWith(last, '?'));",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_pr36f3yo) ===
# Scratch run FAILED
## Error
'contains' undefined near line 15, column 13
The 'contains' function is not yet implemented in Octave.
Please read <https://www.octave.org/missing.html> to learn how you can
contribute missing functionality.
at main.m line 15
(identifier: Octave:undefined-function)
**`contains`** is not available in this sandbox. This is a scratch calculation, so use the Octave equivalent: `~isempty(strfind(s, t))` to test, `numel(strfind(s, t))` to count. Rewriting it is the right move here - this code is not going to anyone.
## It ran, but the NUMBERS may be wrong
- line 1: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
text = "Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride arc
- line 5: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Word count: %d\n", length(words));
- line 10: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Letter 'z' occurrences: %d\n", z_count);
- line 13: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
forbidden = ["fast", "fastest", "quickly"];
- line 16: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Contains '%s': %d\n", forbidden(i), c);
- line 20: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
c40 = sum(contains(text, "40"));
- line 21: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Occurrences of '40': %d\n", c40);
- line 26: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Last sentence ends with ?: %d\n", endsWith(last, '?'));
## Output before it stopped
```
Word count: 100
Letter 'z' occurrences: 0
```
=== [4] THINKING (3s) ===
The word count is confirmed as 100 and no "z" occurrences. The script failed on `contains` but I already got the two most critical numbers. Let me verify the remaining checks manually:
- "fast", "fastest", "quickly": I can see none of these words appear in the text.
- "40" appears exactly once: only in "40 W". ✅
- Last sentence is a question: "Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?" ✅
All constraints verified. Let me present the answer.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
All checks pass. Here's the description:
---
Charge your devices with effortless ease using this compact 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Its gallium nitride architecture delivers high output in a fraction of the space that traditional silicon chargers demand. A single port handles laptops, tablets, and phones alike, so one small unit replaces a whole drawer full of bulky adapters. Built-in safety features guard against overheating, overcharging, and short circuits, keeping every session secure and reliable. Travel light, plug in anywhere, and top off your battery between meetings, flights, or long daily commutes. Ready to swap out your old brick for something truly smarter and smaller?
---
**Word count: 100** (verified programmatically).
Constraint checklist:
| Constraint | Status |
|---|---|
| Exactly 100 words | ✅ |
| "40" appears exactly once | ✅ (only in "40 W") |
| No "fast / fastest / quickly" | ✅ |
| No letter "z" anywhere | ✅ (0 occurrences) |
| Last sentence is a question | ✅ |
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 6.1 s
- Thought: Let me think carefully about this task. Requirements: 1. Product description for a 40 W … 69. and 70. reliable. 71. Travel 72. light, 73. plug 74. in 7
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: The word count is confirmed as 100 and no "z" occurrences. The script failed on … ✅ All constraints verified. Let me present the answer.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 6.0 s for 12,894 tokens · 6,037 generated
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v3/grade.md
+64
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# h06 — Exactly 100 words, five constraints · round v3
> Grading worksheet for round **v3**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5) — mechanical lines graded by `./check.py` on the description paragraph (see grader notes for what was counted as "the description")
- [x] (2) Exactly 100 words per `check.py` → 2/2 — `words : 100 (need 100) OK`
- [ ] (1) "40" appears exactly once → **0/1** — `check.py` on the paragraph alone says `'40' occurrences: 1 OK`; but the model placed a bold title line, **"40 W USB-C GaN Wall Charger"**, directly above the paragraph, inside the same rule-delimited block it labels "the product description". Counted as delivered, the description carries "40" twice. This is the rubric's named trap verbatim — "Writing '40W' and then '40' again somewhere breaks the once-only rule" — and the model's own constraint checklist then asserts "'40' appears exactly once (only in 'This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter')" beneath a heading that contains it
- [x] (1) No banned words and no letter z → 1/1 — `banned words : none OK`, `letter z : absent OK`. (The checklist line "**Zero** occurrences of the letter 'z'" is outside the description and is not counted; noted for the irony)
- [x] (1) Last sentence is a question → 1/1 — `ends with ? : OK` — "Why keep the old brick?"
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) The count the model states equals the checker's count → 1/1 — states 100, checker says 100 for the paragraph it counted
- [x] (1) If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success → 1/1 — the condition does not arise; the word count is right and was measured on the exact string published. (The false claim in the checklist is about "40", not the count, and is charged on correctness line 2)
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) Counted with `matlab_run` (or otherwise demonstrably executed a count). 0 if the count is asserted. → 2/2 — one scratch `matlab_run` on the exact paragraph published, checking all five constraints in one script: `word count: 100`, `count of "40": 1`, `contains fast/fastest/quickly: 0 / 0 / 0`, `contains letter z (any case): 0`, `last sentence: Why keep the old brick?`. The script ran to completion (v2's crashed on `contains` after two checks). The title was added after the check
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Description, then the count, nothing else → **0.5/1** — description and count are there, separated by rules; bracketed by "Here's the product description, verified against every constraint:", a bold title, and a five-tick checklist. Same half-point as v1 and v2, for the same reason, with the title as a new addition
### Automatic deductions
- −2 stated count ≠ actual count → not applied — 100 stated, 100 counted on the paragraph
- −1 for each additional missed constraint beyond the first → not applied — one constraint missed
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — "let me use matlab_run scratch to count" is followed by the call
- automatic fail → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T23:51:56Z (dumped 23:53:37Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 1 — `matlab_run` x1 (`purpose: "scratch"`)
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: none
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=5.5s / total=12.3s (decode=6.8s, 47.6 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=12526, completion_tokens=322; status line: 3,137 generated
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — `Done · 1 tool call · prefill 6.0 s for 12,894 tokens · 3,137 generated`
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): the drafting was done in thinking with a hand count at each step (79 → 103 → 100 by swapping the closing sentence for a five-word one), then verified once by the tool — the v2 shape, one call. The scratch run's lint note ("`"..."` is a *string* object in MATLAB… use `'...'`") fired once rather than v2's eight times, so v2's de-duplication suggestion is either implemented or was not exercised. The nudge fires (40 W). The title is the whole story of this run: the model verified a paragraph and then published it under a heading it did not verify
### Change 54 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
- Did a tool result end with a `Sources:` line? (y/n): n — calculator
- Did the answer carry a URL? (y/n) — and if the tool offered one and the answer dropped it, say so: n — none expected
- Did `[Appears in none of these results: …]` fire? Was it acted on? (n/a if no search): n/a
- Did a `search=` jump report `inside the section '…'`? Did it name the right subject?: n/a
- Did a `search=` miss return the opening of the document? Did the model keep using the source?: n/a
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 8.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 4/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** a 100-word paragraph that passes every mechanical check, verified on the exact string by a script that tested all five constraints; the count stated is the count measured; one call
- **What it got wrong:** it added a title containing "40" above the verified paragraph, so the description as delivered has "40" twice, and its checklist says otherwise. The framing is the same half-point loss as every round
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 8.5 (−1).** The verification is better than v2 (all five checks executed, no crash), the paragraph is as good, and the loss is entirely the unverified decoration added after the check — exactly the pattern the round keeps producing (correct verified core, wrong volunteered extra). v2 shipped no title
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): no harness item. A model note for the round summary: verification covered the text and not the presentation wrapper, and the wrapper broke a constraint
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: mechanical. The paragraph between the rules was saved verbatim and run through `./check.py` at grading time: `words : 100 OK · '40' occurrences: 1 OK · banned words : none OK · letter z : absent OK · ends with ? : OK · ALL PASS`. The same file with the title line the answer places above the paragraph prepended: `words : 106 FAIL · '40' occurrences: 2 FAIL`. The model's own tool output matches the paragraph-only run on all five checks
- Rubric issues: one judgment recorded. "Save only the description text" leaves it to the grader whether a heading the model attaches to the description is part of it. Scored here as: the paragraph is the description for the mechanical word count (the model's stated count refers to it, so the −2 does not fire), but the heading is part of the delivered description for the "40 once" constraint, because the rubric's trap says "again *somewhere*" and a heading the user would paste with the copy is the most likely somewhere. A grader who excludes the heading entirely would give 9.5; recorded so the choice is visible
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v3/result.txt
+164
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : hard/h06-exactly-100-words (round v3)
# chat id : 004ae8dd-6ffe-449c-b4a9-f84b2e8f1d71
# chat title : 40W USB-C GaN Charger
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 1 matlab_run x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T23:53:37Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T23:51:56Z) ===
Write a product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Hard constraints: exactly 100 words; the digit string "40" appears exactly once; do not use the words "fast", "fastest" or "quickly"; do not use the letter "z" anywhere; the last sentence must be a question. Count the words before you answer and tell me the count.
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T23:51:56Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=12526 eval_count=322 prompt_tokens=12526 completion_tokens=322 total=12.3s prefill=5.5s decode=6.8s 47.6 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
Let me think about this carefully. Requirements:
1. Exactly 100 words
2. The digit string "40" appears exactly once
3. No "fast", "fastest", "quickly"
4. No letter "z" anywhere (probably both upper and lower case — I'll avoid both)
5. Last sentence must be a question
6. Count words before answering and report the count
Let me draft and count with a tool. I should use matlab_run scratch to count words and verify constraints.
Draft:
"Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from a single compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter packs serious power into a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride technology that runs cool under load. One port handles PD 3.0 so it works with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android devices. Foldable pins slip it into any carry-on, while safety circuitry guards against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. A tidy cable? Maybe not included, but the charger itself is."
Wait — last sentence must be a question. Let me fix. Also check for "z" — none. Check "fast/quickly" — none.
Let me write a draft ending in a question:
"Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. Ready to swap out that bulky old brick?"
Check "z": none I think. "fast": none. "40" once: yes. Last sentence is a question: yes.
Now count words carefully. Let me use matlab_run scratch to count.
Actually let me count manually first then verify:
Sentence 1: Charge(1) your(2) phone(3) tablet(4) or(5) laptop(6) from(7) one(8) compact(9) plug(10). → 10
Sentence 2: This(11) 40(12) W(13) USB-C(14) GaN(15) adapter(16) delivers(17) serious(18) output(19) in(20) a(21) body(22) smaller(23) than(24) a(25) matchbox(26) thanks(27) to(28) gallium(29) nitride(30) that(31) stays(32) cool(33) under(34) load(35). → 25, total 35
Sentence 3: A(36) single(37) port(38) speaks(39) Power(40) Delivery(41) 3.0(42) so(43) it(44) pairs(45) with(46) iPhones(47) iPads(48) MacBooks(49) and(50) most(51) Android(52) gear(53). → 18, total 53
Sentence 4: The(54) foldable(55) pins(56) tuck(57) it(58) into(59) any(60) carry-on(61) and(62) built-in(63) safeguards(64) guard(65) against(66) overvoltage(67) overheating(68) and(69) short(70) circuits(71). → 18, total 71
Sentence 5: Ready(72) to(73) swap(74) out(75) that(76) bulky(77) old(78) brick(79)? → 8, total 79
Only 79 words. Need exactly 100. Need to add 21 more words. Let me expand.
Let me rewrite with more content:
"Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag. Ready to swap out that bulky old charger?"
Count:
S1: Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. = 10
S2: This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. = 25 (total 35)
S3: A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. = 18 (total 53)
S4: The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. = 18 (total 71)
S5: Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag.
Whether(72) you(73) are(74) heading(75) to(76) the(77) office(78) the(79) gym(80) or(81) the(82) gate(83) at(84) the(85) airport(86) one(87) small(88) brick(89) covers(90) every(91) device(92) in(93) your(94) bag(95). = 24 (total 95)
S6: Ready to swap out that bulky old charger? = 8 (total 103)
103 — three too many. Remove "old" and... need -3. "Ready to swap out that bulky charger?" = 7 → total 102. Still 2 over. Hmm.
Let me recount S5 carefully: "Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag."
Whether-you-are-heading-to-the-office-the-gym-or-the-gate-at-the-airport-one-small-brick-covers-every-device-in-your-bag
= Whether(1) you(2) are(3) heading(4) to(5) the(6) office(7) the(8) gym(9) or(10) the(11) gate(12) at(13) the(14) airport(15) one(16) small(17) brick(18) covers(19) every(20) device(21) in(22) your(23) bag(24). Yes 24.
Total with S6=8: 10+25+18+18+24+8 = 103. Need 100. Remove 3 words.
Options: change S6 to "Ready to swap out that bulky brick?" = Ready-to-swap-out-that-bulky-brick = 7 → total 102. Still 2 over.
Change S6 to "Time to swap out that bulky brick?" = 8, same.
Better: shorten S5 by 2 and S6 by 1? Or find 3 words to cut.
Alternative: trim S3: "A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear." → "A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, pairing with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear." saves 1 (drops "so it" → "pairing"). Hmm awkward.
Let me try a different approach — write target and use matlab_run scratch to count exactly, iterate.
Actually let me just design for 100 more carefully. Target sentence lengths summing to 100.
Try:
S1: 10
S2: 25
S3: 18
S4: 18
S5: 24
S6: 5 → "Why keep the old brick?" = Why-keep-the-old-brick = 5. Total: 10+25+18+18+24+5 = 100!
Check: "Why keep the old brick?" — question ✓, no z ✓.
Full text:
"Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag. Why keep the old brick?"
Hmm "brick" appears twice (S5 and S6). That's OK stylistically — actually it's a nice callback. But let me reconsider: "one small brick covers every device... Why keep the old brick?" — slightly redundant but works as a punchline.
Let me verify all constraints:
- Words: 100 (verified by tool)
- "40" appears exactly once: yes, only in "40 W". Note "3.0" contains "0" but not "40". Good.
- No "fast"/"fastest"/"quickly": none.
- No letter "z": let me scan... "Charge your phone tablet or laptop from one compact plug This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0 so it pairs with iPhones iPads MacBooks and most Android gear The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage overheating and short circuits Whether you are heading to the office the gym or the gate at the airport one small brick covers every device in your bag Why keep the old brick" — no z anywhere. ✓
- Last sentence is a question: "Why keep the old brick?" ✓
Now I should verify word count with matlab_run scratch. Let me do that.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_ofroxo0c) ===
{
"code": "text = \"Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag. Why keep the old brick?\";\nwords = regexp(text, '\\S+', 'match');\nfprintf('word count: %d\\n', numel(words));\nfprintf('count of \"40\": %d\\n', numel(regexp(text, '40', 'match')));\nfprintf('contains fast/fastest/quickly: ');\nfprintf('%d / %d / %d\\n', ~isempty(strfind(lower(text),'fast')), ~isempty(strfind(lower(text),'fastest')), ~isempty(strfind(lower(text),'quickly')));\nfprintf('contains letter z (any case): %d\\n', ~isempty(regexp(text, '[zZ]', 'once')));\nlast = strsplit(text, '. ');\nfprintf('last sentence: %s\\n', last{end});\n",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_ofroxo0c) ===
# Scratch run OK (0.47s)
## It ran, but the NUMBERS may be wrong
- line 1: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
text = "Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output
## Output
```
word count: 100
count of "40": 1
contains fast/fastest/quickly: 0 / 0 / 0
contains letter z (any case): 0
last sentence: Why keep the old brick?
```
=== [4] THINKING (1s) ===
All constraints verified (the warning was just about MATLAB vs. Octave string types, and since I used single quotes, the numbers are correct). Word count: exactly 100 words. Let me present the description along with the count.
=== [5] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Here's the product description, verified against every constraint:
---
**40 W USB-C GaN Wall Charger**
Charge your phone, tablet, or laptop from one compact plug. This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter delivers serious output in a body smaller than a matchbox, thanks to gallium nitride that stays cool under load. A single port speaks Power Delivery 3.0, so it pairs with iPhones, iPads, MacBooks, and most Android gear. The foldable pins tuck it into any carry-on, and built-in safeguards guard against overvoltage, overheating, and short circuits. Whether you are heading to the office, the gym, or the gate at the airport, one small brick covers every device in your bag. Why keep the old brick?
---
**Word count: 100** (counted programmatically before answering)
Constraint check:
- ✅ Exactly 100 words
- ✅ "40" appears exactly once (only in "This 40 W USB-C GaN adapter")
- ✅ No "fast", "fastest", or "quickly"
- ✅ Zero occurrences of the letter "z" (any case)
- ✅ Last sentence is a question: "Why keep the old brick?"
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 8.4 s
- Thought: Let me think about this carefully. Requirements: 1. Exactly 100 words 2. The digit … Whether(72) you(73) are(74) heading(75) to(76) the(77) office
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: All constraints verified (the warning was just about MATLAB vs. Octave string types, … 100 words. Let me present the description along with the count.
- Writing response
- Done · 1 tool call · prefill 6.0 s for 12,894 tokens · 3,137 generated
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v4/grade.md
+62
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
# h06 — Exactly 100 words, five constraints · round v4
> Grading worksheet for round **v4**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5) — mechanical lines graded by `./check.py` on the description paragraph (the blockquote under **Product description:**; see grader notes)
- [x] (2) Exactly 100 words per `check.py` → 2/2 — `words : 100 (need 100) OK`
- [x] (1) "40" appears exactly once → 1/1 — `'40' occurrences: 1 (need 1) OK`. No title this round — the v3 loss (a bold heading "40 W USB-C GaN Wall Charger" above the paragraph) does not recur; the description is a labelled blockquote and nothing else
- [x] (1) No banned words and no letter z → 1/1 — `banned words : none OK`, `letter z : absent OK`. (The thinking caught "maximizing" in its first draft and replaced it with "boosting" before any tool call)
- [x] (1) Last sentence is a question → 1/1 — `ends with ? : OK` — "Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?"
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) The count the model states equals the checker's count → 1/1 — states 100; checker says 100 on the exact string published (the final `matlab_run` text and the blockquote are byte-identical)
- [x] (1) If it could not hit exactly 100, it says so instead of claiming success → 1/1 — the condition does not arise; the count was measured on the published string and is right
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) Counted with `matlab_run` (or otherwise demonstrably executed a count). 0 if the count is asserted. → 2/2 — four scratch calls, all five constraints in each script, and the count driving the edits: 102 (first run, crashed on `contains` after printing the count; rewritten with `strfind` per the tool's hint) → 102 → 101 (drop "remarkably") → 100 (drop "extra"). The tool, not the hand count (which had said 89 for a draft the tool later measured at 102), decided every revision
### Communication (1)
- [~] (1) Description, then the count, nothing else → **0.5/1** — description and count are there and the count is last; the answer opens with a one-line verification summary ("All checks pass — verified programmatically: exactly **100 words**, "40" appears once, no "z"…") and a **Product description:** label before the blockquote. Same half-point as every round, for the same framing reason, with less of it than v3 (no title, no five-tick checklist)
### Automatic deductions
- −2 stated count ≠ actual count → not applied — 100 stated, 100 counted
- −1 for each additional missed constraint beyond the first → not applied — none missed
- −1 intent-without-call → not applied — "Let me use the tool to count and verify" is followed by the call
- automatic fail → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-12T04:53:22Z (dumped 04:55:07Z)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 4 — `matlab_run` ×4 (`purpose: "scratch"`): crashed on `contains` (count printed first), then three clean runs at 102, 101, 100 words
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: one crash, recovered on the next call by following the tool's Octave-equivalent hint (`numel(strfind(s, t))`). The two intermediate runs are iteration, not waste — each trimmed one word and re-measured
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prefill=0.9s / total=5.3s (decode=4.3s, 48.5 tok/s) / prompt_eval_count=14298 (final round), completion_tokens=209; status line: 3,604 generated
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — four `Calling matlab_run` lines, `Done · 4 tool calls · prefill 5.2 s for 12,978 tokens · 3,604 generated`
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): three things. (1) The hand count in thinking was wrong by a wide margin — 89 for a draft that had ~90 words, then "let me add 11 more words" produced a draft the tool measured at 102 — and the model said so before calling: "Let me use matlab_run to count. That's the reliable way." The tool then did all the counting. This is the prompt's trap ("LLMs are bad at exact word counts") handled the way the rubric wants. (2) The `contains` hint (Change 5x, scratch mode) fired and was followed exactly. (3) **The double-quoted-string note fired twelve times in one result** — once per line with `"…"` — a full screen of the same sentence. v3's grade thought the de-duplication had landed because it saw the note once; v3's script had one such line. The note should say it once and list the line numbers. The nudge fires (40 W)
### Change 55 checks (this round's changes — fill in even when they did not fire)
- Did a tool result carry a `Sources:` trailer? (y/n): n — calculator
- Did the answer end with a URL — written by the model, or appended by the `answer_sources` filter? (model / filter / none): none — none expected
- Any of the 55.2 tool fixes exercised? Which, and did it fire correctly?: neither new `matlab_run` hint (`\'`, function order) had an occasion — the scripts contain no escaped apostrophes and no functions. The `contains` hint is Change 5x's and fired correctly
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 9.5 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 0.5/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** a 100-word paragraph that passes every mechanical check, measured on the exact string published by a script that tested all five constraints, iterated three times on the tool's count rather than the model's; the z-word caught before any call; no unverified decoration attached to the description
- **What it got wrong:** the framing — a verification summary above and a label between; the same half-point as v1–v3
- **Change from the previous round:** **8.5 → 9.5 (+1).** The point regained is the "40 once" line: v3 verified a paragraph and then published it under a title containing "40"; v4 published the verified paragraph and nothing else. Tool use is heavier (1 → 4 calls) because the model let the tool drive the edits instead of hand-counting to 100 first, which is the safer of the two shapes. Highest score on this prompt across the four rounds
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): one small tool-output item — the string-type lint note repeats once per offending line (12 copies here); collapse to one note with the line numbers. No model item: the v3 "unverified wrapper" pattern did not recur
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: mechanical. The blockquote was saved verbatim and run through `./check.py`: `words : 100 OK · '40' occurrences: 1 OK · banned words : none OK · letter z : absent OK · ends with ? : OK · ALL PASS`. For the record, the whole delivered message run through the same checker fails (142 words, "40" twice, z present, no closing "?") — every failure is in the verification summary and the label, which quote the constraints; the rubric's "save only the description text" excludes them, and v3's judgment (a heading the user would paste with the copy counts; a checklist does not) is applied the same way here: there is no heading this round
- Rubric issues: v3's note on what counts as "the description" stands and did not need to be exercised
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h06-exactly-100-words/v4/result.txt
+335
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : hard/h06-exactly-100-words (round v4)
# chat id : c40e3d18-7760-44a7-98c4-a5857065dadc
# chat title : USB-C Charger Details
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 4 matlab_run x4
# dumped at : 2026-09-12T04:55:07Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-12T04:53:22Z) ===
Write a product description for a 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger. Hard constraints: exactly 100 words; the digit string "40" appears exactly once; do not use the words "fast", "fastest" or "quickly"; do not use the letter "z" anywhere; the last sentence must be a question. Count the words before you answer and tell me the count.
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-12T04:53:22Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=14298 eval_count=209 prompt_tokens=14298 completion_tokens=209 total=5.3s prefill=0.9s decode=4.3s 48.5 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
Let me think carefully about this task.
Requirements:
1. Exactly 100 words
2. The digit string "40" appears exactly once
3. No words "fast", "fastest", or "quickly"
4. No letter "z" anywhere
5. Last sentence must be a question
6. Count words before answering and tell the count
Let me draft a product description and then verify with tools.
Let me write a draft:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while maximizing efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable output. Will it become the only adapter you carry?"
Let me check constraints:
- "40" appears once ✓ (in "40 W")
- No "fast", "fastest", "quickly" ✓
- No "z" — let me check... "effortless" no z, "robust" no z, "maximizing" — wait, no z there. Let me recheck each word carefully.
Actually, let me use matlab_run to count words and check for "z". That's the right approach per my instructions.
Let me draft more carefully and verify with tools.
Draft:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while maximizing efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable output. Will it become the only adapter you carry?"
Check for "z":
- "effortless" - e,f,f,o,r,t,l,e,s,s - no z
- "neatly" - no z
- "maximizing" - m,a,x,i,m,i,z,i,n,g - Z! Problem!
Let me replace "maximizing" with something else. "boosting"? b,o,o,s,t,i,n,g - no z. Or "raising"? Or just restructure.
Let me try again:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable output. Will it become the only adapter you carry?"
Check for z again:
- effortless ✓
- neat ✓
- boosting ✓
- neighboring ✓
- travelers ✓
- alike ✓
- premium ✓
- dependable ✓
Wait, let me check every single word for z:
Charge, your, devices, with, effortless, ease, This, 40, W, USB-C, GaN, wall, charger, delivers, robust, power, in, a, compact, form, factor, fitting, neatly, into, any, outlet, Gallium, nitride, technology, keeps, heat, low, while, boosting, efficiency, so, your, laptop, tablet, or, phone, tops, up, at, a, steady, pace, A, single, port, handles, all, your, daily, needs, and, the, slim, profile, means, it, never, blocks, a, neighboring, socket, Built, for, travelers, and, desk, workers, alike, it, pairs, premium, build, quality, with, dependable, output, Will, it, become, the, only, adapter, you, carry
Hmm, I don't see any z. Good.
Now let me count words. Let me use matlab_run to be precise. Actually, let me just carefully count:
1. Charge
2. your
3. devices
4. with
5. effortless
6. ease
7. This
8. 40
9. W
10. USB-C
11. GaN
12. wall
13. charger
14. delivers
15. robust
16. power
17. in
18. a
19. compact
20. form
21. factor
22. fitting
23. neatly
24. into
25. any
26. outlet
27. Gallium
28. nitride
29. technology
30. keeps
31. heat
32. low
33. while
34. boosting
35. efficiency
36. so
37. your
38. laptop
39. tablet
40. or
41. phone
42. tops
43. up
44. at
45. a
46. steady
47. pace
48. A
49. single
50. port
51. handles
52. all
53. your
54. daily
55. needs
56. and
57. the
58. slim
59. profile
60. means
61. it
62. never
63. blocks
64. a
65. neighboring
66. socket
67. Built
68. for
69. travelers
70. and
71. desk
72. workers
73. alike
74. it
75. pairs
76. premium
77. build
78. quality
79. with
80. dependable
81. output
82. Will
83. it
84. become
85. the
86. only
87. adapter
88. you
89. carry
That's 89 words. I need 100. Let me add 11 more words.
Let me restructure to hit exactly 100. Let me use matlab_run to count precisely and iterate.
Actually, let me just write it out and use matlab_run to count. That's the reliable way.
Let me try a longer draft:
"Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a remarkably compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up extra space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?"
Let me count this with matlab_run. Let me also check for z.
Words to check for z: "neatly" no, "boosting" no, "neighboring" no, "travelers" no, "alike" no, "consistent" no...
Wait - I need to double-check "neighboring" — n,e,i,g,h,b,o,r,i,n,g — no z. Good.
Let me use the tool to count and verify.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_43qluemn) ===
{
"code": "text = \"Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a remarkably compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up extra space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?\";\n\n% Count words (split on whitespace)\nwords = strsplit(text);\nwc = length(words);\nfprintf(\"Word count: %d\\n\", wc);\n\n% Check for 'z'\nlower = lower(text);\nif contains(lower, 'z')\n fprintf(\"FAIL: contains 'z'\\n\");\nelse\n fprintf(\"OK: no 'z'\\n\");\nend\n\n% Check forbidden words\nfor w = [\"fast\",\"fastest\",\"quickly\"]\n if contains(lower, w)\n fprintf(\"FAIL: contains '%s'\\n\", w);\n end\nend\nfprintf(\"OK: no forbidden words\\n\");\n\n% Count occurrences of \"40\"\ncnt = 0;\ntoks = regexp(text, '\\d+', 'match');\nfor i = 1:numel(toks)\n if toks{i} == \"40\"\n cnt = cnt + 1;\n end\nend\nfprintf(\"Occurrences of '40': %d\\n\", cnt);\n\n% Last sentence is a question?\nsents = regexp(text, '[^.!?]+[.!?]', 'match');\nlast = sents{end};\nfprintf(\"Last sentence: %s\\n\", last);\nif endsWith(strtrim(last), '?')\n fprintf(\"OK: last sentence is a question\\n\");\nelse\n fprintf(\"FAIL: last sentence not a question\\n\");\nend\n",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [3] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_43qluemn) ===
# Scratch run FAILED
## Error
'contains' undefined near line 10, column 4
The 'contains' function is not yet implemented in Octave.
Please read <https://www.octave.org/missing.html> to learn how you can
contribute missing functionality.
at main.m line 10
(identifier: Octave:undefined-function)
**`contains`** is not available in this sandbox. This is a scratch calculation, so use the Octave equivalent: `~isempty(strfind(s, t))` to test, `numel(strfind(s, t))` to count. Rewriting it is the right move here - this code is not going to anyone.
## It ran, but the NUMBERS may be wrong
- line 1: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
text = "Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a remarkably
- line 6: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Word count: %d\n", wc);
- line 11: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("FAIL: contains 'z'\n");
- line 13: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("OK: no 'z'\n");
- line 17: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
for w = ["fast","fastest","quickly"]
- line 19: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("FAIL: contains '%s'\n", w);
- line 22: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("OK: no forbidden words\n");
- line 28: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
if toks{i} == "40"
- line 32: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Occurrences of '40': %d\n", cnt);
- line 37: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("Last sentence: %s\n", last);
- line 39: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("OK: last sentence is a question\n");
- line 41: In MATLAB R2017a+ "..." is a *string* object; in Octave it is a char array, and some functions branch on that type. Use '...' for char unless you deliberately want a string.
fprintf("FAIL: last sentence not a question\n");
## Output before it stopped
```
Word count: 102
```
=== [4] THINKING ===
I need to adjust the word count from 102 to exactly 100 words, and I'm checking for any instances of "z" in the text. Let me rewrite the verification using strfind instead of contains, then trim two words to hit the target.
=== [5] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_leo0masd) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a remarkably compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up extra space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?';\n\nwords = strsplit(text);\nfprintf('Word count: %d\\n', length(words));\n\nlower = lower(text);\nzidx = find(lower == 'z');\nfprintf('z occurrences: %d\\n', numel(zidx));\n\nfor w = {'fast','fastest','quickly'}\n fprintf('%s: %d\\n', w{1}, numel(strfind(lower, w{1})));\nend\n\ntoks = regexp(text, '\\d+', 'match');\ncnt40 = 0;\nfor i = 1:numel(toks)\n if strcmp(toks{i}, '40'), cnt40 = cnt40 + 1; end\nend\nfprintf('40 count: %d\\n', cnt40);\n\nsents = regexp(text, '[^.!?]+[.!?]', 'match');\nlast = strtrim(sents{end});\nfprintf('Last sentence: %s\\n', last);\nfprintf('Ends with ?: %d\\n', last(end) == '?');\n",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [6] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_leo0masd) ===
# Scratch run OK (0.41s)
## Output
```
Word count: 102
z occurrences: 0
fast: 0
fastest: 0
quickly: 0
40 count: 1
Last sentence: Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?
Ends with ?: 1
```
=== [7] THINKING ===
I need to trim the word count from 102 down to 100 by removing two words. I'm considering dropping "remarkably" and either "frequent" or "extra" to get there. Let me test this revised version to confirm it hits exactly 100 words.
=== [8] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_jvba9o2p) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up extra space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?';\n\nwords = strsplit(text);\nfprintf('Word count: %d\\n', length(words));\nfprintf('z occurrences: %d\\n', numel(find(lower(text) == 'z')));\nfor w = {'fast','fastest','quickly'}\n fprintf('%s: %d\\n', w{1}, numel(strfind(lower(text), w{1})));\nend\ntoks = regexp(text, '\\d+', 'match');\ncnt40 = sum(cellfun(@(t) strcmp(t,'40'), toks));\nfprintf('40 count: %d\\n', cnt40);\nsents = regexp(text, '[^.!?]+[.!?]', 'match');\nlast = strtrim(sents{end});\nfprintf('Last sentence: %s\\n', last);\nfprintf('Ends with ?: %d\\n', last(end) == '?');\n",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [9] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_jvba9o2p) ===
# Scratch run OK (0.43s)
## Output
```
Word count: 101
z occurrences: 0
fast: 0
fastest: 0
quickly: 0
40 count: 1
Last sentence: Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?
Ends with ?: 1
```
=== [10] THINKING ===
I'm considering different ways to trim this down—removing "extra" or "frequent," or shortening the ending to "carry?" instead of "carry from now on?"—and I'll test a few variations to see which works best.
=== [11] TOOL CALL: matlab_run (call_5gfvzcd5) ===
{
"code": "text = 'Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?';\n\nwords = strsplit(text);\nfprintf('Word count: %d\\n', length(words));\nfprintf('z occurrences: %d\\n', numel(find(lower(text) == 'z')));\nfor w = {'fast','fastest','quickly'}\n fprintf('%s: %d\\n', w{1}, numel(strfind(lower(text), w{1})));\nend\ntoks = regexp(text, '\\d+', 'match');\ncnt40 = sum(cellfun(@(t) strcmp(t,'40'), toks));\nfprintf('40 count: %d\\n', cnt40);\nsents = regexp(text, '[^.!?]+[.!?]', 'match');\nlast = strtrim(sents{end});\nfprintf('Last sentence: %s\\n', last);\nfprintf('Ends with ?: %d\\n', last(end) == '?');\n",
"purpose": "scratch"
}
=== [12] TOOL RESULT: matlab_run (call_5gfvzcd5) ===
# Scratch run OK (0.44s)
## Output
```
Word count: 100
z occurrences: 0
fast: 0
fastest: 0
quickly: 0
40 count: 1
Last sentence: Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?
Ends with ?: 1
```
=== [13] THINKING (0s) ===
All checks passed. Submitting the answer.
=== [14] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
All checks pass — verified programmatically: exactly **100 words**, "40" appears once, no "z", no forbidden words, last sentence is a question.
**Product description:**
> Charge your devices with effortless ease. This 40 W USB-C GaN wall charger delivers robust power in a compact form factor, fitting neatly into any outlet without taking up space. Gallium nitride technology keeps heat low while boosting overall efficiency, so your laptop, tablet, or phone tops up at a steady, reliable pace. A single port handles all your daily needs, and the slim profile means it never blocks a neighboring socket. Built for frequent travelers and desk workers alike, it pairs premium build quality with dependable, consistent output. Will it become the only adapter you carry from now on?
**Word count: 100** (counted by splitting on whitespace; each hyphenated token like "USB-C" counts as one word).
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 7.2 s
- Thought: Let me think carefully about this task. Requirements: 1. Exactly 100 words 2. The digit … 50. port 51. handles 52. all 53. your 54. daily 55. needs 56.
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: I need to adjust the word count from 102 to exactly 100 words, and I'm checking for any … instead of contains, then trim two words to hit the target.
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: I need to trim the word count from 102 down to 100 by removing two words. I'm … test this revised version to confirm it hits exactly 100 words.
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: I'm considering different ways to trim this down—removing "extra" or "frequent," or … on?"—and I'll test a few variations to see which works best.
- Calling matlab_run
- Thinking
- Thought: All checks passed. Submitting the answer.
- Writing response
- Done · 4 tool calls · prefill 5.2 s for 12,978 tokens · 3,604 generated