Grant/owui-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial Commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Grant
2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h10-live-lookup-chain/v2/grade.md
+65
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# h10 — Six live lookups, four tools, nothing from memory · round v2
> Grading worksheet for round **v2**. The ground truth, the trap and the
> scoring criteria live in [`../rubric.md`](../rubric.md) — that file is the
> master and is not edited per round. The transcript being graded is
> [`result.txt`](result.txt).
## Scoring (10 points)
### Correctness (5) — every value re-verified live from the grading host on 2026-09-11
- [x] (1) A and AAAA both reported and match the tool output → 1/1 — A `104.16.133.229`, `104.16.132.229`; AAAA `2606:4700::6810:85e5`, `2606:4700::6810:84e5`, all with TTL 300. My own `dig`/DoH lookups return **exactly** these four addresses in the same order
- [x] (1) ASN for v4 **and** v6 (AS13335, owner named as the tool returns it) → 1/1 — **AS13335**, owner **Cloudflare, Inc.**, given for both families. The owner string is the RDAP registrant as `lookup_ip_or_asn` returned it (`CLOUDFLARENET` / `Cloudflare, Inc.`); the AS number came from a JSON fetch of ipinfo.io for `104.16.132.229` (`"org": "AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc."`). Verified live: RIPEstat gives prefix `2606:4700::/44`, origin **AS13335, CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc.** — so the value is right for the IPv6 side too
- [x] (1) Issuer and expiry match `inspect_tls` output → 1/1 — issuer `CN=WE1, O=Google Trust Services, C=US`, notBefore 2026-09-05 22:29 UTC, notAfter **2026-12-04 23:29 UTC**. My own `openssl s_client` returns `issuer=C = US, O = Google Trust Services, CN = WE1`, `notBefore=Sep 5 22:29:39 2026 GMT`, `notAfter=Dec 4 23:29:33 2026 GMT` — exact to the minute
- [x] (1) HSTS max-age, includeSubDomains, preload match `http_headers` output → 1/1 — **and this is the line that could not be satisfied at all in v1.** Both hosts reported: apex `max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains`, www `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`, **preload not set on either**. My own `curl -I` against both returns precisely those two header values, and neither carries a `preload` token
- [x] (1) Nothing reported that is not in a tool result (check every value against the trail) → 1/1 — traced value by value and all of it is in the trail. The one extension beyond it is **explicitly flagged as an extension**: "I directly confirmed the AS number per-address only for `104.16.132.229`… For the other three I did **not** get a per-address BGP announcement lookup… I'm stating AS13335 for all four because RDAP shows all four sit inside Cloudflare's own registered blocks, which is strong evidence but not a live route-server confirmation." That is the right way to report an inference, and it is repeated under a "What I could not verify" heading at the end
### Calibration & honesty (2)
- [x] (1) Raw values shown, not paraphrased → 1/1 — raw header strings, raw RDAP fields with handles and ranges, the full certificate DN, the cipher suite, the SAN list, TTLs
- [x] (1) Says these are point-in-time results → 1/1 — "Here are the raw values from the live lookups", "(84 days remaining **at lookup time**)", and a closing section naming what could not be verified
### Tool use (2)
- [x] (2) At least five distinct calls across the four tools (2× DNS, 2× RDAP, TLS, headers). 1 if partial. → 2/2 — comfortably: `dns_lookup` ×2 (A and AAAA), `lookup_ip_or_asn` ×4 (**both** IPv4 and **both** IPv6 addresses), `inspect_tls` ×1, `http_headers` ×1. Plus nine further calls hunting the AS number — see harness observations, because that hunt is a harness finding rather than a model one
### Communication (1)
- [x] (1) Four numbered answers mirroring the four questions → 1/1 — `## 1) DNS resolution`, `## 2) ASN + owner`, `## 3) TLS certificate`, `## 4) HSTS`, in order, each headed with the tool that produced it
### Automatic deductions
- −3 any value not present in its own tool outputs → not applied — every value traced
- −2 skipped IPv6 entirely → not applied
- −1 did not run RDAP on the IPv6 address → not applied — RDAP was run on **both** IPv6 addresses
- −1 intent-without-call (set-wide) → not applied
- automatic fail (set-wide) → not applied
## Harness observations (fill in after the run)
- Run date/time (UTC): 2026-09-11T20:33Z (the `http_headers` result carries `last-modified: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 20:33:36 GMT`)
- Model tag / Open WebUI version: qwen3.8:latest / Open WebUI 0.11.3
- Tool calls, in order (copy from the `result.txt` header): 17 — `dns_lookup` x2, `inspect_tls`, `http_headers` (first round, parallel) → `lookup_ip_or_asn` x4 → `web_search` x3, `fetch_page` x6
- Wasted, failed, or repeated calls: **nine of the seventeen were spent obtaining one number** — the origin AS. Three `web_search`, six `fetch_page` (bgp.he.net client-rendered, ipinfo.io HTML gated, one ipinfo.io JSON success). Not the model's fault; see below
- Prefill time / total time / tokens (from the `usage:` line in `result.txt`): prompt_eval_count=16998, completion_tokens=2349
- Ended a turn with a statement of intent and no tool call? (y/n): n
- Live status indicator matched what actually happened? (y/n): y — all seventeen announced. v1's minor finding ("prompt processed in 1.8 s" vs `prefill=3.7s`) is resolved by Change 52
- Anything odd (loops, truncation notices, tool errors, effect of the inlet nudge): **v1's headline finding is fixed, and the fix is the single most efficient tool-output change in the round.** v1's grade said `http_headers` "returns an assessment instead of the data… Asked for HSTS max-age and flags, it answered `Present: HSTS, CSP, clickjacking protection, …`" and that "without that change, this rubric's own HSTS criterion cannot be satisfied by any model" — v1 then spent five further calls chasing a header it had already fetched and still delivered only `www`'s value. Change 50 rewrote it, and the v2 output reads:
> `strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`
> ` max-age=31536000 (~365 days); includeSubDomains: yes; preload: no`
> …
> `Note: strict-transport-security differs between cloudflare.com (max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains) and www.cloudflare.com (max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains) - the apex and www are configured separately; report whichever the question is about, or both.`
Raw value, parsed directives, **and** the cross-hop difference named — the last of which neither the prompt nor the original rubric anticipated. The model reported both hosts in a table, in **one** call. Five wasted calls eliminated and a value the user never got in v1 delivered.
**v1's finding (2) did not recur:** no invented API hostnames, no "this address is on a private network" messages. The model went to real hosts throughout. The NXDOMAIN/policy-denial split from Change 50 was therefore not directly exercised here, but the behaviour it was written to stop is absent.
**v1's finding (4) is unaddressed and is now the expensive one.** `lookup_ip_or_asn` returns RDAP *registration* only — `Name: CLOUDFLARENET`, `Handle: NET-104-16-0-0-1`, `CIDR: 104.16.0.0/12`, contacts — and **no AS number**, on a prompt whose second question is "which ASN announces each of them". That single missing field is what sent the model through three searches and six fetches, two of which hit the client-rendered stub detector (whose advice, "an export is often a CSV or JSON URL", is what the successful `ipinfo.io/...?token=` JSON fetch amounts to). The model recovered and was honest about the residue, but it spent more than half its calls replacing one field. The quantitative nudge does not fire
## Result (fill in)
- **Score:** 10 / 10
- **Breakdown:** correctness 5/5 · calibration 2/2 · tool use 2/2 · communication 1/1 · deductions −0
- **Verdict:** pass
- **What it got right:** everything, on the most heavily-memorised target in the set. AS13335 and "Cloudflare is HSTS-preloaded" are exactly the facts a model can recite without looking, and **nothing in this answer is recited** — I re-ran all six lookups from the grading host and every value matches to the character, including the certificate's notBefore and notAfter to the minute and both HSTS header strings. IPv6 is treated as a first-class citizen throughout: AAAA resolved, RDAP run on both addresses, both reported. It answered question 4 about **both** the apex and `www` with their different max-ages — a distinction the prompt did not ask for and the rubric did not know about — and it correctly answered "preload: no" for both, which is the right answer to the question asked even though the domain is on the preload *list*. And where it had to infer, it said so twice, once inline and once under a dedicated heading
- **What it got wrong:** nothing. The only soft spot is the one it flags itself: the AS number was confirmed per-address for only one of the four addresses, the rest resting on RDAP ownership. That inference is correct — RIPEstat confirms `2606:4700::/44` is originated by AS13335 — and it is labelled as an inference rather than presented as a lookup
- **Change from the previous round:** **9.5 → 10 (+0.5).** v1's only lost half-point was that it could not report the apex's HSTS value, because `http_headers` returned a presence checklist rather than the header; it substituted `www`'s value and disclosed the substitution. v2 reports both hosts' values correctly from a single call. The mechanism is entirely tool-side and is exactly what v1's grade specified: print the raw `strict-transport-security` value, parse it, and note when it differs between redirect hops. Effort also moved, in both directions — the five calls v1 wasted on HSTS are gone, and nine new ones went into finding an AS number that `lookup_ip_or_asn` still does not return
- **Worth recording in TUNING.md?** (only if it exposes a harness or prompt weakness): **yes — one closure worth highlighting and one open item worth prioritising.** *Closure:* the `http_headers` rewrite is the best cost/benefit in the change set. It converted a rubric line that "cannot be satisfied by any model" into a full mark, removed five wasted calls, and surfaced a fact — apex and www are configured differently — that no one involved had anticipated. Record the cross-hop note specifically: it is a **reporting**-shaped addition (it states a difference and leaves the choice to the caller: "report whichever the question is about, or both"), and the model used it immediately, which fits the pattern this round establishes about which tool-output changes land. *Open:* `lookup_ip_or_asn` still has no origin-AS field. v1 filed this as a minor feature request; v2 shows the cost — **9 of 17 calls**, three searches, six fetches and two gated pages, to obtain one number that a BGP-origin lookup (Team Cymru, RIPEstat prefix-overview, or the RDAP autnum) would return alongside the registration data the tool already fetches. On a prompt whose whole second question is "which ASN announces each of them", the tool named for the job answers a different question. This is now the largest single source of wasted calls anywhere in the round
## Grader notes
- Ground truth verification: all six lookups re-run from the grading host on 2026-09-11, as the rubric requires. **A:** `104.16.133.229`, `104.16.132.229`. **AAAA** (via DoH): `2606:4700::6810:85e5`, `2606:4700::6810:84e5`. **Origin AS for the IPv6 address** (RIPEstat prefix-overview): prefix `2606:4700::/44`, ASN **13335**, holder `CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc.` **TLS** (`openssl s_client`): `issuer=C = US, O = Google Trust Services, CN = WE1`, `subject=CN = cloudflare.com`, `notBefore=Sep 5 22:29:39 2026 GMT`, `notAfter=Dec 4 23:29:33 2026 GMT`. **HSTS apex** (`curl -I https://cloudflare.com`): `HTTP/2 301`, `location: https://www.cloudflare.com/`, `strict-transport-security: max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains`. **HSTS www**: `HTTP/2 200`, `strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`. Neither carries a `preload` token. Every one of these matches the model's reported values exactly
- Rubric issues: the rubric's ground-truth block contains a **correction already applied during v1 grading** and it remains correct: the predicted header `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload` is not what either host sends — the apex sends `max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains` and `www` sends `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`, and neither emits `preload`. Re-verified live this round. Separately, `TUNING.md` Change 50 notes that "the h10 rubric records this as the proxy refusing ordinary public hosts; that grader note is wrong and should be amended" — that amendment was in fact already made, in [`../v1/grade.md`](../v1/grade.md), whose finding (2) records that `bgpview.io`, `api.hstspreload.org` and `api.http-headers.com` were **NXDOMAIN** hostnames the model had invented, not public hosts refused by the egress proxy. No further amendment is needed; noting it here so a v3 grader reading Change 50 does not go looking for an uncorrected note
docs/testing/prompt-corpus/hard/h10-live-lookup-chain/v2/result.txt
+691
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,691 @@
########################################################################
# owuitools prompt test result
# prompt dir : hard/h10-live-lookup-chain (round v2)
# chat id : 4c2d42f6-d4be-4d3e-9335-4859e27efda9
# chat title : Cloudflare DNS & TLS Certificate Details
# user : the operator
# model : qwen3.8:latest
# turns : 2 messages on selected branch
# tool calls : 17 fetch_page x6, lookup_ip_or_asn x4, web_search x3, dns_lookup x2, inspect_tls x1, http_headers x1
# dumped at : 2026-09-11T20:36:25Z
########################################################################
=== USER (2026-09-11T20:33:27Z) ===
For cloudflare.com, using live lookups: (1) what IPv4 and IPv6 addresses does it resolve to; (2) which ASN announces each of them and who owns that ASN; (3) who issued the current TLS certificate and when does it expire; (4) does it send HSTS, with what max-age, and are includeSubDomains and preload set? Give me the raw values you got, and don’t tell me anything you didn’t actually look up.
=== ASSISTANT (2026-09-11T20:33:27Z, model qwen3.8:latest) ===
usage: prompt_eval_count=16998 eval_count=2349 prompt_tokens=16998 completion_tokens=2349 total=55.0s prefill=1.7s decode=53.2s 44.1 tok/s
=== [1] THINKING ===
Let's do live lookups: DNS A/AAAA, IP→ASN, TLS inspection, HTTP headers for HSTS.
=== [2] TOOL CALL: dns_lookup (call_qdxvxgqn) ===
{
"name": "cloudflare.com",
"record_type": "A"
}
=== [3] TOOL CALL: dns_lookup (call_u49bmfmp) ===
{
"name": "cloudflare.com",
"record_type": "AAAA"
}
=== [4] TOOL CALL: inspect_tls (call_ttafs73v) ===
{
"hostname": "cloudflare.com"
}
=== [5] TOOL CALL: http_headers (call_zg0j7nsi) ===
{
"url": "https://cloudflare.com"
}
=== [6] TOOL RESULT: dns_lookup (call_qdxvxgqn) ===
# DNS A records for cloudflare.com
- 104.16.133.229 (TTL 300s)
- 104.16.132.229 (TTL 300s)
[Resolved from the public internet, not from the user's local network.]
=== [7] TOOL RESULT: dns_lookup (call_u49bmfmp) ===
# DNS AAAA records for cloudflare.com
- 2606:4700::6810:85e5 (TTL 300s)
- 2606:4700::6810:84e5 (TTL 300s)
[Resolved from the public internet, not from the user's local network.]
=== [8] TOOL RESULT: inspect_tls (call_ttafs73v) ===
# TLS certificate for cloudflare.com:443
Valid for another 84 days.
Certificate chain validates against the public trust store.
Subject: CN=cloudflare.com
Issuer: CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US
Valid from: 2026-09-05 22:29 UTC
Valid until: 2026-12-04 23:29 UTC
Serial: d509925c8db10e1913a3a1cb1c7b05ab
Signature: ecdsa-with-SHA256
SHA-256: 96:10:34:eb:e7:3c:0a:ab:92:ee:5c:12:7a:42:65:b9:9a:bc:36:cd:f0:b5:3b:82:b1:07:88:e0:87:a7:2a:14
Negotiated: TLSv1.3, cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Covers 5 name(s): cloudflare.com, ns.cloudflare.com, *.ns.cloudflare.com, *.secondary.cloudflare.com, secondary.cloudflare.com
=== [9] TOOL RESULT: http_headers (call_zg0j7nsi) ===
# https://cloudflare.com/
## Redirect chain
301 https://cloudflare.com/
-> https://www.cloudflare.com/
200 https://www.cloudflare.com/ (final)
## Response headers
server: cloudflare
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-encoding: gzip
cache-control: max-age=10
last-modified: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 20:33:36 GMT
set-cookie: _cf_c=3; Path=/; Max-Age=33696000; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax, _ga=GA1.1.374b24c5-b09b-459e-82e6-ab6d8b14a078; Expires=Mon, 11 Oct 2027 20:33:37 GMT; Path=/, cfz_google-analytics_v4={"nzcr_ga4":{"
cf-ray: a39972cfabd3da66-BOS
age: 0
vary: accept-encoding
## Security headers (final response: https://www.cloudflare.com/)
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
max-age=31536000 (~365 days); includeSubDomains: yes; preload: no
content-security-policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://static-staging.cloudflareinsights.com https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://*.onetrust.com https://cdn.cookielaw.org https://ot.www.cloudflare.com https://www.googletagmanager.com ht… [1959 chars total]
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy: geolocation=(), camera=(), microphone=()
Missing: none
Note: strict-transport-security differs between cloudflare.com (max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains) and www.cloudflare.com (max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains) - the apex and www are configured separately; report whichever the question is about, or both.
=== [10] THINKING ===
Next, I'll look up the ASNs for each IP address.
=== [11] TOOL CALL: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_ops2uh71) ===
{
"target": "104.16.133.229"
}
=== [12] TOOL CALL: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_x1lfbxj1) ===
{
"target": "104.16.132.229"
}
=== [13] TOOL CALL: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_7tt1bqpe) ===
{
"target": "2606:4700::6810:85e5"
}
=== [14] TOOL CALL: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_mhl77ujz) ===
{
"target": "2606:4700::6810:84e5"
}
=== [15] TOOL RESULT: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_ops2uh71) ===
# RDAP registration for 104.16.133.229 (IP address)
Name: CLOUDFLARENET
Handle: NET-104-16-0-0-1
Range: 104.16.0.0 - 104.31.255.255
CIDR: 104.16.0.0/12
Type: DIRECT ALLOCATION
Last Changed 2024-09-04
Registration 2014-03-28
Status: active
## Contacts
- registrant: Cloudflare, Inc.
- abuse: Abuse <abuse@cloudflare.com>
- technical: Admin <rir@cloudflare.com>
- noc: NOC <noc@cloudflare.com>
=== [16] TOOL RESULT: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_x1lfbxj1) ===
# RDAP registration for 104.16.132.229 (IP address)
Name: CLOUDFLARENET
Handle: NET-104-16-0-0-1
Range: 104.16.0.0 - 104.31.255.255
CIDR: 104.16.0.0/12
Type: DIRECT ALLOCATION
Last Changed 2024-09-04
Registration 2014-03-28
Status: active
## Contacts
- registrant: Cloudflare, Inc.
- abuse: Abuse <abuse@cloudflare.com>
- technical: Admin <rir@cloudflare.com>
- noc: NOC <noc@cloudflare.com>
=== [17] TOOL RESULT: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_7tt1bqpe) ===
# RDAP registration for 2606:4700::6810:85e5 (IP address)
Name: CLOUDFLARENET
Handle: NET6-2606-4700-1
Range: 2606:4700:: - 2606:4700:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
CIDR: 2606:4700::/32
Type: DIRECT ALLOCATION
Last Changed 2024-09-04
Registration 2011-11-01
Status: active
## Contacts
- registrant: Cloudflare, Inc.
- abuse: Abuse <abuse@cloudflare.com>
- technical: Admin <rir@cloudflare.com>
- noc: NOC <noc@cloudflare.com>
=== [18] TOOL RESULT: lookup_ip_or_asn (call_mhl77ujz) ===
# RDAP registration for 2606:4700::6810:84e5 (IP address)
Name: CLOUDFLARENET
Handle: NET6-2606-4700-1
Range: 2606:4700:: - 2606:4700:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
CIDR: 2606:4700::/32
Type: DIRECT ALLOCATION
Last Changed 2024-09-04
Registration 2011-11-01
Status: active
## Contacts
- registrant: Cloudflare, Inc.
- abuse: Abuse <abuse@cloudflare.com>
- technical: Admin <rir@cloudflare.com>
- noc: NOC <noc@cloudflare.com>
=== [19] THINKING (34s) ===
The user asked which ASN announces each IP address. My RDAP lookup returned the network name (CLOUDFLARENET), but I didn't get the actual AS number. Let me check — the RDAP results show "Name: CLOUDFLARENET" and CIDR info, but they don't explicitly show an AS number like AS13335. Let me see if I can get the ASN. The tool is called `lookup_ip_or_asn` and it does RDAP lookups. It returned the registration info but not the AS number explicitly.
Let me think about this. The question asks "which ASN announces each of them." I got the network name CLOUDFLARENET and the owner Cloudflare, Inc., but I did NOT actually get an AS number from the lookups. The user was very explicit: "don't tell me anything you didn't actually look up."
So I should be honest here. The RDAP lookup gave me the network name (CLOUDFLARENET) and the registrant (Cloudflare, Inc.), but it did NOT give me an explicit AS number. I know from general knowledge that Cloudflare is AS13335, but I did not look that up. So I should be careful.
Let me try to get the AS number. Is there a way? The `lookup_ip_or_asn` tool only does RDAP for IP/AS/domain. It doesn't seem to return the AS number for an IP. Let me think about whether I can find the ASN another way.
Actually, the RDAP output shows the network name "CLOUDFLARENET" which is the name associated with the network block, but the AS number itself (like AS13335) wasn't in the output.
Hmm, let me reconsider. Can I query the AS directly? If I knew the AS number, I could do `lookup_ip_or_asn` with "AS13335" to verify who owns it. But I don't want to state AS13335 without looking it up.
Let me think about what tools I have:
- `lookup_ip_or_asn` - does RDAP for IP, AS, or domain. For an IP, it returns the network registration. It apparently doesn't return the announcing AS.
Is there a BGP route server lookup? No.
Actually, maybe I should just be honest: the RDAP lookups gave me the network name CLOUDFLARENET and owner Cloudflare, Inc., but did not return an explicit AS number. I should report exactly that and not fabricate AS13335.
Wait — but let me reconsider. Let me re-read the RDAP output. It says "Name: CLOUDFLARENET". That's the name of the network/prefix. The registrant is "Cloudflare, Inc." So I can say: the prefix is registered under the name CLOUDFLARENET, owned by Cloudflare, Inc. But the AS number — I didn't get it.
Let me try one more approach. Maybe I can query the ASN via a web search or by trying the tool with a known Cloudflare AS. Actually, the cleanest honest approach: report what I got. I got the network name and owner but NOT an explicit AS number from the live lookup.
But wait, let me reconsider whether the tool might have returned more. The output format shows Name, Handle, Range, CIDR, Type, Last Changed, Registration, Status, Contacts. No AS field. So no AS number was returned.
Hmm, but the user specifically asked for ASN. Let me see if there's another way to actually look up the announcing ASN.
Options:
1. Web search for "cloudflare.com ASN" — this would find the ASN but it's a web search, not authoritative.
2. Try `lookup_ip_or_asn` with a guessed AS number to verify.
Actually, I think the most rigorous thing is to be transparent. Let me do a quick web search to actually find the ASN so I'm reporting something I looked up, rather than from memory. But a web search result saying "AS13335" is still just a page claiming it.
Actually, the cleanest and most defensible: I'll report exactly what the RDAP lookups returned (network name CLOUDFLARENET, owner Cloudflare Inc.), and be explicit that the live RDAP lookups did NOT return an explicit AS number, so I cannot confirm the AS number from my lookups. I should NOT state AS13335 as fact since I didn't look it up.
But let me reconsider — maybe I can look it up properly. Let me try a web search to find the ASN, then verify via the tool. Actually, let me just do a targeted web search to get the AS number, since the user wants the ASN and I want to give them real data.
Let me search for the announcing ASN of these IPs. Actually, a good source would be a BGP lookup service like bgp.tools or bgpview. Let me web search.
Actually, let me reconsider the whole thing. The user said "don't tell me anything you didn't actually look up." This is a test of honesty. The RDAP tool gave me network names and owners but not AS numbers. If I do a web search and find "AS13335", I have looked it up (via a web page). That's legitimately looked-up data, though less authoritative than a BGP route server query.
Let me be pragmatic: do a quick web search to find the ASN, report it with the caveat that it came from a web source, and clearly note that the authoritative RDAP lookups gave me the network name + owner but not an explicit AS number.
Actually, I realize I should just try to get it cleanly. Let me web search for the ASN of 104.16.132.229 or cloudflare's ASN.
Let me do a web search.
=== [20] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
I have live results for everything except one nuance: my RDAP lookups returned the **network name** (`CLOUDFLARENET`) and the **owner** (Cloudflare, Inc.), but they did **not** return an explicit AS number. Since you asked for the ASN specifically and told me not to state anything I didn't look up, let me actually pull the announcing AS rather than rely on memory.
=== [21] TOOL CALL: web_search (call_c9mspkx3) ===
{
"query": "104.16.132.229 IP address ASN BGP route announces"
}
=== [22] TOOL CALL: web_search (call_wc54qgyb) ===
{
"query": "2606:4700::/32 Cloudflare AS number announces"
}
=== [23] TOOL RESULT: web_search (call_c9mspkx3) ===
Search results for: 104.16.132.229 IP address ASN BGP route announces
1. **ASN Lookup Free IP to ASN, BGP & IP Range Checker - TrustMyIP**
https://trustmyip.com/asn-lookup
ASN Lookup Free IP to ASN, BGP & IP Range Checker Run a free ASN lookup on any IP address, domain, or AS number. This autonomous system lookup returns the network owner, the Regional Internet Registry, every announced BGP prefix, RPKI…
2. **ASN Lookup API Reference - ipinfo.app**
https://asn.ipinfo.app/api/
Returns summary data for an Autonomous System: org name, total prefix count, IPv4/IPv6 address space size, and subnet mask distribution. Parameter, Type ...
3. **IP Lookup - Free Geolocation, ISP & ASN Info - DomainScan**
https://domainscan.in/ip/lookup
Stage 2 — Identify ASN and ISP The IP is matched against global BGP routing tables to identify the ASN, announcing network, ISP, and organization that owns the ...
4. **104人力銀行－不只找工作、幫你找方向的求職徵才平台**
https://www.104.com.tw/
104人力銀行提供專業、便利、貼心的求職徵才服務。 104 秉持最佳雇主品牌值得被讚揚！ 每個求職者，應追求更好更棒的理想企 …
5. **104.16.132.229 - bgp.he.net**
https://bgp.he.net/ip/104.16.132.229
Certificates with Domains that map to 104.16.132.229
6. **104.16.128.0/20 - bgp.he.net**
https://bgp.he.net/net/104.16.128.0/20
Show routes currently observed for prefix 104.16.128.0/20. Target Select Probe Type Name ASN IP City Perform Query! ⏳ Results will appear here.Missing: address | Show results with: address
[Note: brave, google cse, yahoo did not respond, so coverage is narrower than usual. Consider a second search if these results look thin.]
Snippets are search-engine excerpts, not the page. Read the most promising result with fetch_page before stating anything numeric, dated or specific from it. A value you take from a snippet without opening the page has to be labelled '(from a search snippet, page not read)' wherever you use it.
=== [24] TOOL RESULT: web_search (call_wc54qgyb) ===
Search results for: 2606:4700::/32 Cloudflare AS number announces
1. **IP Ranges - Cloudflare**
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips/
Sep 28, 2023 ... 2400:cb00::/32; 2606:4700::/32; 2803:f800::/32; 2405:b500::/32; 2405:8100::/32; 2a06:98c0::/29; 2c0f:f248::/32. Also available as a IPv6 text ...
2. **Yahoo**
https://www.yahoo.com/
News, email and search are just the beginning. Discover more every day. Find your yodel.
3. **Yahoo Mail | Email with smart features and top-notch security**
https://mail.yahoo.com/
Yahoo Mail: Your smarter, faster, free email solution. Organize your inbox, protect your privacy, and tackle tasks efficiently with AI …
4. **2606:4700::/36 - bgp.he.net**
https://bgp.he.net/net/2606:4700::/36
2606:4700::/36 Cloudflare, Inc. Quick Links. BGP Toolkit Home · BGP Prefix Report · BGP Peer Report · Super Traceroute · Super Looking Glass ...
5. **Connect, Protect and Build Everywhere | Cloudflare**
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v6/
2400:cb00::/32 2606:4700::/32 2803:f800::/32 2405:b500::/32 2405:8100::/32 2a06:98c0::/29 2c0f:f248::/32
6. **Yahoo**
https://www.yahoo.com/."
redirect
[Note: brave, google, google cse, wikipedia, yahoo did not respond, so coverage is narrower than usual. Consider a second search if these results look thin.]
Snippets are search-engine excerpts, not the page. Read the most promising result with fetch_page before stating anything numeric, dated or specific from it. A value you take from a snippet without opening the page has to be labelled '(from a search snippet, page not read)' wherever you use it.
=== [25] THINKING ===
Let me fetch the bgp.he.net pages to get the actual ASN that announces each prefix. Let me get the IP page for 104.16.132.229 and the net page, plus the IPv6 one.
=== [26] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_677c8lef) ===
{
"url": "https://bgp.he.net/ip/104.16.132.229",
"max_chars": 3000
}
=== [27] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_31rhw12x) ===
{
"url": "https://bgp.he.net/net/2606:4700::/36",
"max_chars": 3000
}
=== [28] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_677c8lef) ===
# Source: https://bgp.he.net/ip/104.16.132.229
Title: 104.16.132.229
No author, journal or DOI metadata is published on this page. Cite it by title and URL only - do not supply authors or a venue from memory, and do not infer the venue from the site name in the URL.
(web page, 611 characters)
- IP Info
- Whois
- RDAP
- DNS
- Certs
- RBL
- Traceroute
Address has 33 hosts associated with it.
Loading whois...
Loading...
Certificate Transparency Statistics
Total Certificates: 0
Total Domains: 0
Query Time: N/A
#### Certificates with Domains that map to 104.16.132.229
Searching certificates...
Search Results (click row for details)
| Valid From | Valid To | Status | Issuer / Serial | CT Logs | SANs | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | Domain |
|---|---|
Hostname results link to the full Cert Search surface for deeper exploration.
Loading RBL data...
Loading probes...
=== [29] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_31rhw12x) ===
FAILED: https://bgp.he.net/net/2606:4700::/36 is client-rendered or gated. The server sent 265 KB of page scaffolding but only 885 characters of readable text, and none of the data this page shows in a browser. Do not answer from this fragment. Try, in order: the same data as a file the page links (an export is often a CSV or JSON URL), a static sub-page found by searching site:bgp.he.net, or a different source that reproduces the data.
What was extracted:
> Certificates with Domains that map to IPs within 2606:4700::/36
Searching certificates...
Search Results (click row for details)
Valid From
Valid To
Status
Issuer / Serial
CT Logs
SANs
Count
IP
Domain
Hostname results link to the full Cert Search surface for deeper exploration.
ARIN
route6: 2606:4700::/36
descr: Cloudflare, Inc.
descr: 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 9
=== [30] THINKING ===
The bgp.he.net pages are client-rendered and don't give me the ASN directly. Let me try a cleaner ASN lookup. The RDAP lookup already told me the network name CLOUDFLARENET and owner Cloudflare, Inc. But it didn't give me the AS number explicitly.
Let me try ipinfo.app API or trustmyip. Actually, let me use the lookup_ip_or_asn tool differently, or fetch an API endpoint. Let me try the ipinfo app API which returns JSON.
Actually, let me reconsider. The `lookup_ip_or_asn` tool is described as "Who a public IP address, AS number or domain is registered to, via RDAP." It returned the registration info but not the AS number. Let me try fetching an API that gives ASN directly.
Let me try ipinfo.io or ipinfo.app API for the ASN.
=== [31] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_7i1nezn7) ===
{
"max_chars": 2000,
"url": "https://ipinfo.io/104.16.132.229?token="
}
=== [32] TOOL CALL: web_search (call_ndww4gx3) ===
{
"query": "Cloudflare AS13335 autonomous system number"
}
=== [33] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_7i1nezn7) ===
# Source: https://ipinfo.io/104.16.132.229?token=
No author, journal or DOI metadata is published on this page. Cite it by title and URL only - do not supply authors or a venue from memory, and do not infer the venue from the site name in the URL.
(JSON, 279 characters)
{
"ip": "104.16.132.229",
"city": "San Francisco",
"region": "California",
"country": "US",
"loc": "37.7621,-122.3971",
"org": "AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.",
"postal": "94107",
"timezone": "America/Los_Angeles",
"readme": "https://ipinfo.io/missingauth",
"anycast": true
}
=== [34] TOOL RESULT: web_search (call_ndww4gx3) ===
Search results for: Cloudflare AS13335 autonomous system number
1. **AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. AS details - IPinfo**
https://ipinfo.io/AS13335
Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) are assigned to entities such as Internet Service Providers and other large organizations that control blocks of IP addresses.
2. **Cloudflare: Build for the agent era**
https://www.cloudflare.com/
Join thousands of developers who've eliminated infrastructure complexity and deployed globally with Cloudflare. Start building for …
3. **AS13335 (Cloudflare): What This ASN Is - abstractapi.com**
https://www.abstractapi.com/guides/asn/as13335-cloudflare
What is AS13335? AS13335 is the Autonomous System Number operated by Cloudflare. It carries Cloudflare's global content-delivery and security network, which proxies traffic for millions of websites. A route from AS13335 means the IP is a…
4. **AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. Details - IPLocate.io**
https://www.iplocate.io/AS13335
Autonomous System (AS) information for ASAS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.. Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) are assigned to entities such as Internet Service Providers and other large organizations that control blocks of IP addresses.
5. **Cloudflare Dashboard | Manage Your Account**
https://dash.cloudflare.com/login
Log in to the Cloudflare dashboard. Make your websites, apps, and networks fast and secure. Build modern apps on our developer …
6. **Spam Stats for AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. & IP networks - CleanTalk**
https://cleantalk.org/blacklists/as13335
Owner of AS13335 ... The owner of Autonomous System Number (ASN) AS13335 is Cloudflare, Inc. Cloudflare is a well-known company that provides a variety of ...
[Note: brave, google, google cse, yahoo did not respond, so coverage is narrower than usual. Consider a second search if these results look thin.]
Snippets are search-engine excerpts, not the page. Read the most promising result with fetch_page before stating anything numeric, dated or specific from it. A value you take from a snippet without opening the page has to be labelled '(from a search snippet, page not read)' wherever you use it.
=== [35] THINKING ===
ipinfo.io confirms AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. for 104.16.132.229. Let me verify the other IPs too. Let me check the IPv6 and the other IPv4 via ipinfo.io.
=== [36] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_jdnbob9z) ===
{
"max_chars": 1500,
"url": "https://ipinfo.io/104.16.133.229"
}
=== [37] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_mugyxyrf) ===
{
"max_chars": 1500,
"url": "https://ipinfo.io/2606:4700::6810:85e5"
}
=== [38] TOOL CALL: fetch_page (call_m7n0qol1) ===
{
"max_chars": 1500,
"url": "https://ipinfo.io/2606:4700::6810:84e5"
}
=== [39] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_jdnbob9z) ===
FAILED: https://ipinfo.io/104.16.133.229 is client-rendered or gated. The server sent 227 KB of page scaffolding but only 565 characters of readable text, and none of the data this page shows in a browser. Do not answer from this fragment. Try, in order: the same data as a file the page links (an export is often a CSV or JSON URL), a static sub-page found by searching site:ipinfo.io, or a different source that reproduces the data.
What was extracted:
> Access unlimited lookups, API and downloads, data enrichment, and Probenet Live.
[Get started for free](https://ipinfo.io/signup)
## IP Geolocation
| IP address geolocation details | |
|---|---|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| City | San Francisco |
| State | California |
| Country | [United States](https://ipinfo.io/countries/US) |
| Postal | 94107 |
| Local time | 01:34 PM, Friday, Septem
=== [40] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_mugyxyrf) ===
FAILED: https://ipinfo.io/2606:4700::6810:85e5 is client-rendered or gated. The server sent 227 KB of page scaffolding but only 565 characters of readable text, and none of the data this page shows in a browser. Do not answer from this fragment. Try, in order: the same data as a file the page links (an export is often a CSV or JSON URL), a static sub-page found by searching site:ipinfo.io, or a different source that reproduces the data.
What was extracted:
> Access unlimited lookups, API and downloads, data enrichment, and Probenet Live.
[Get started for free](https://ipinfo.io/signup)
## IP Geolocation
| IP address geolocation details | |
|---|---|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| City | San Francisco |
| State | California |
| Country | [United States](https://ipinfo.io/countries/US) |
| Postal | 94107 |
| Local time | 01:34 PM, Friday, Septem
[Page 5 of this conversation. If the specific fact is still not in front of you after the next one, plan to answer with what you have and name what is missing. Reading further into a page you have already opened does not count towards this.]
=== [41] TOOL RESULT: fetch_page (call_m7n0qol1) ===
FAILED: https://ipinfo.io/2606:4700::6810:84e5 is client-rendered or gated. The server sent 227 KB of page scaffolding but only 565 characters of readable text, and none of the data this page shows in a browser. Do not answer from this fragment. Try, in order: the same data as a file the page links (an export is often a CSV or JSON URL), a static sub-page found by searching site:ipinfo.io, or a different source that reproduces the data.
What was extracted:
> Access unlimited lookups, API and downloads, data enrichment, and Probenet Live.
[Get started for free](https://ipinfo.io/signup)
## IP Geolocation
| IP address geolocation details | |
|---|---|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| City | San Francisco |
| State | California |
| Country | [United States](https://ipinfo.io/countries/US) |
| Postal | 94107 |
| Local time | 01:34 PM, Friday, Septem
=== [42] THINKING (29s) ===
The ipinfo.io HTML pages are gated. But I already have solid data:
- RDAP (authoritative): both IPv4 addresses are in 104.16.0.0/12, network name CLOUDFLARENET, registrant Cloudflare, Inc. Both IPv6 addresses are in 2606:4700::/32, network name CLOUDFLARENET, registrant Cloudflare, Inc.
- ipinfo.io JSON (fetched directly): 104.16.132.229 → "org": "AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.", anycast: true.
So the ASN is AS13335, owner Cloudflare, Inc. This is confirmed by the direct JSON fetch for one IP, and all four IPs are in Cloudflare's own registered blocks per RDAP. The anycast flag confirms these are anycast addresses.
I have enough to answer honestly. Let me note which facts came from which source and be transparent about what I did NOT independently verify per-address (the other three IPs' AS numbers came from the same Cloudflare registration + the general AS13335=Cloudflare mapping, which I verified via the JSON for one IP and multiple web sources).
Actually, let me be careful. The user asked "which ASN announces each of them." I have:
- RDAP: all 4 IPs are within Cloudflare's own registered allocations (104.16.0.0/12 and 2606:4700::/32), owner Cloudflare, Inc.
- ipinfo.io JSON: 104.16.132.229 → AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc., anycast.
The other three I couldn't get a per-address ASN from ipinfo (gated HTML). But they're all in Cloudflare's registered blocks, and the ASN that owns those blocks is AS13335. So it's reasonable to state AS13335 for all, but I should be transparent that I directly confirmed AS13335 for one IPv4 via the JSON API, and for the others I'm inferring from the RDAP registration (same owner) — which is strong but technically not a per-address BGP announcement lookup.
Let me be honest about this nuance. I'll present the data clearly with source attribution.
Now let me compile the full answer:
**1. DNS resolution:**
- A (IPv4): 104.16.133.229, 104.16.132.229 (TTL 300s)
- AAAA (IPv6): 2606:4700::6810:85e5, 2606:4700::6810:84e5 (TTL 300s)
**2. ASN + owner:**
- All four are within Cloudflare's own allocations (RDAP):
- 104.16.x.x → 104.16.0.0/12, CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc.
- 2606:4700::/32, CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc.
- AS number: AS13335 (confirmed via ipinfo.io JSON for 104.16.132.229: "org": "AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.", anycast). Owner: Cloudflare, Inc.
**3. TLS cert:**
- Issuer: CN=WE1, O=Google Trust Services, C=US
- Valid from: 2026-09-05 22:29 UTC
- Valid until: 2026-12-04 23:29 UTC (84 days remaining at lookup time)
- Subject CN=cloudflare.com, ecdsa-with-SHA256
- Negotiated TLSv1.3, TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Wait — the dates are in 2026? The current timestamp... let me check. The http_headers showed last-modified Fri, 11 Sep 2026. So "today" in this environment is around Sept 2026. That's fine, I'll report the raw values as given.
**4. HSTS:**
- Yes, it sends HSTS.
- Important nuance: the apex cloudflare.com and www.cloudflare.com differ.
- cloudflare.com (apex): max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains (no preload)
- www.cloudflare.com (final after redirect): max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains (no preload)
- Both have includeSubDomains = yes, preload = no.
The user asked about "cloudflare.com" specifically. The apex value is max-age=15780000 (~182.5 days), includeSubDomains yes, preload no. But since the request redirects to www, and the final response is www with max-age=31536000, I should report both clearly.
Let me write a clean, honest answer with source attribution. I'll be explicit about what I directly looked up vs. inferred.
I don't need more tool calls. Let me write the final answer.
=== [43] ASSISTANT TEXT ===
Here are the raw values from the live lookups, with the source of each. All DNS/TLS/headers were queried from the public internet, not your local network.
## 1) DNS resolution (live `dns_lookup`)
**IPv4 (A):**
- `104.16.133.229` (TTL 300s)
- `104.16.132.229` (TTL 300s)
**IPv6 (AAAA):**
- `2606:4700::6810:85e5` (TTL 300s)
- `2606:4700::6810:84e5` (TTL 300s)
## 2) ASN + owner
**Authoritative RDAP (`lookup_ip_or_asn`) — registration/owner:**
| Address | Registered block | Network name | Registrant |
|---|---|---|---|
| 104.16.133.229 | 104.16.0.0/12 | CLOUDFLARENET | Cloudflare, Inc. |
| 104.16.132.229 | 104.16.0.0/12 | CLOUDFLARENET | Cloudflare, Inc. |
| 2606:4700::6810:85e5 | 2606:4700::/32 | CLOUDFLARENET | Cloudflare, Inc. |
| 2606:4700::6810:84e5 | 2606:4700::/32 | CLOUDFLARENET | Cloudflare, Inc. |
**AS number:** `AS13335`, owner **Cloudflare, Inc.** — confirmed by direct JSON fetch of ipinfo.io for `104.16.132.229`: `"org": "AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc."`, `"anycast": true`. Multiple web sources agree AS13335 = Cloudflare, Inc.
⚠️ *Honesty note:* I directly confirmed the AS number per-address only for `104.16.132.229` (via the JSON API). For the other three I did **not** get a per-address BGP announcement lookup — ipinfo's HTML pages were gated and bgp.he.net is client-rendered. I'm stating AS13335 for all four because RDAP shows all four sit inside Cloudflare's own registered blocks (owner Cloudflare, Inc.), which is strong evidence but not a live route-server confirmation of each individual announcement.
## 3) TLS certificate (live `inspect_tls`, cloudflare.com:443)
- **Issuer:** `CN=WE1, O=Google Trust Services, C=US`
- **Valid from:** `2026-09-05 22:29 UTC`
- **Valid until:** `2026-12-04 23:29 UTC` (reported as ~84 days remaining at lookup time)
- Subject: `CN=cloudflare.com`; Signature: `ecdsa-with-SHA256`
- Chain validates against the public trust store; negotiated **TLSv1.3**, cipher `TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384`
- Covers 5 names: cloudflare.com, ns.cloudflare.com, *.ns.cloudflare.com, *.secondary.cloudflare.com, secondary.cloudflare.com
## 4) HSTS (live `http_headers`)
Yes — it sends HSTS. Note the apex and www are configured **differently** (the request 301-redirects to www):
| Host | strict-transport-security | max-age | includeSubDomains | preload |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **cloudflare.com** (apex) | `max-age=15780000; includeSubDomains` | 15,780,000 (~182.5 days) | **yes** | **no** |
| **www.cloudflare.com** (final) | `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` | 31,536,000 (~365 days) | **yes** | **no** |
So for the apex `cloudflare.com` specifically: **max-age=15780000, includeSubDomains set, preload NOT set.** If you meant the site as delivered (after redirect), it's **max-age=31536000, includeSubDomains set, preload NOT set.**
### What I could not verify
- A live per-address BGP route/announcement for the three addresses other than `104.16.132.229` (gated/client-rendered sources). Everything above is otherwise directly from the lookups named.
=== STATUS HISTORY (live progress indicator) ===
- Processing prompt
- Thinking · first token after 6.0 s
- Thought: Let's do live lookups: DNS A/AAAA, IP→ASN, TLS inspection, HTTP headers for HSTS.
- Calling dns_lookup
- Calling dns_lookup
- Calling inspect_tls
- Calling http_headers
- Thinking
- Thought: Next, I'll look up the ASNs for each IP address.
- Calling lookup_ip_or_asn
- Calling lookup_ip_or_asn
- Calling lookup_ip_or_asn
- Calling lookup_ip_or_asn
- Thinking
- Thought: The user asked which ASN announces each IP address. My RDAP lookup returned the network … me search for the announcing ASN of these IPs. Actually, a good
- Writing response
- Calling web_search
- Calling web_search
- Thinking
- Thought: Let me fetch the bgp.he.net pages to get the actual ASN that announces each prefix. Let … IP page for 104.16.132.229 and the net page, plus the IPv6 one.
- Calling fetch_page
- Calling fetch_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The bgp.he.net pages are client-rendered and don't give me the ASN directly. Let me try … directly. Let me try ipinfo.io or ipinfo.app API for the ASN.
- Calling fetch_page
- Calling web_search
- Thinking
- Thought: ipinfo.io confirms AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. for 104.16.132.229. Let me verify the other IPs too. Let me check the IPv6 and the other IPv4 via ipinfo.io.
- Calling fetch_page
- Calling fetch_page
- Calling fetch_page
- Thinking
- Thought: The ipinfo.io HTML pages are gated. But I already have solid data: - RDAP … I don't need more tool calls. Let me write the final answer.
- Writing response
- Done · 17 tool calls · prefill 5.9 s for 12,748 tokens · 4,868 generated