Initial Commit

2026-09-15 15:24:03 -04:00
commit 4dc7086e7e
605 changed files with 101380 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+1. IT / SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
+SCORE: 5.0/10
+
+Strengths:
+- Excellent diagnostic commands: ip route get, ip rule, tcpdump, conntrack, NAT rules, rp_filter.
+- Correctly distinguishes rp_filter as a drop mechanism and ARP as separate from IP source selection.
+- Correctly prioritizes routing investigation.
+
+Major errors:
+- Incorrectly claims conntrack "pins" the egress interface. Conntrack tracks flow/NAT state; normal routing still determines egress.
+- Docker's standard MASQUERADE rule applies to Docker-source traffic (e.g. 172.17.0.0/16), not arbitrary host replies from 192.168.50.10.
+- Docker does not normally make host-local replies intermittently fall through to the default route.
+- With 192.168.50.10/24 configured, a connected 192.168.50.0/24 route should normally exist; its absence would itself be a configuration fault.
+- The proposed source-policy rule does not make NAT "unable to re-source" traffic; SNAT occurs after route selection.
+- conntrack -F is unnecessarily disruptive as a diagnostic suggestion.
+
+Verdict:
+Strong troubleshooting vocabulary and tooling, but the central Docker/conntrack causal explanation is technically wrong. This is exactly the kind of plausible-sounding networking hallucination the prompt was designed to expose.